Alasia Ledford, Harry Adynski, Linda Beeber, Byron J. Powell, Jada L. Brooks, Anna Matthews, Jennifer Leeman
{"title":"Implementing mental health interventions in perinatal home visiting programs: a systematic review of the literature","authors":"Alasia Ledford, Harry Adynski, Linda Beeber, Byron J. Powell, Jada L. Brooks, Anna Matthews, Jennifer Leeman","doi":"10.1007/s00737-026-01685-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Perinatal home visiting programs are well positioned to deliver mental health interventions to those at high risk for adverse mental health outcomes. The purpose of this review was to examine home-based mental health interventions, their effectiveness, and how they have been implemented in perinatal home visiting programs.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and Social Work Abstracts for reports of experimental or quasi-experimental studies evaluating outcomes of a mental health intervention delivered in the home setting as part of a perinatal home visiting program in the United States. Data extracted included the study demographics, design, characteristics of the interventions, evidence of intervention effectiveness, implementation strategies, and implementation outcomes and determinants.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Data abstractors screened 3,500 articles published from January 2010 to January 2024. Of these, 25 articles reporting findings of 12 distinct mental health interventions met the criteria for inclusion. Interventions were based on a variety of therapeutic approaches such as cognitive behavioral therapy, collaborative problem solving, and motivational interviewing. Interventionists ranged from paraprofessionals such as community health workers to professionals such as registered nurses, nurse practitioners and licensed clinical social workers, in addition to others. Recipients of the interventions were predominantly white women; high risk groups including American Indian/Alaskan Native and Asian/Pacific Islander populations were underrepresented in studies. Studies demonstrated evidence of effectiveness in reducing symptoms of depression. Few studies systematically evaluated implementation outcomes or strategies, or followed standard recommendations for reporting implementation outcomes, limiting synthesis.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Mental health interventions delivered through perinatal home visiting programs show effectiveness at reducing depressive symptoms, and in a subset of studies, anxiety symptoms, though evidence for reduction in anxiety is more limited. Variations in how implementation measures were reported limited synthesis demonstrating that further research is needed in implementation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8369,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Women's Mental Health","volume":"29 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Women's Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00737-026-01685-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
Perinatal home visiting programs are well positioned to deliver mental health interventions to those at high risk for adverse mental health outcomes. The purpose of this review was to examine home-based mental health interventions, their effectiveness, and how they have been implemented in perinatal home visiting programs.
Methods
Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and Social Work Abstracts for reports of experimental or quasi-experimental studies evaluating outcomes of a mental health intervention delivered in the home setting as part of a perinatal home visiting program in the United States. Data extracted included the study demographics, design, characteristics of the interventions, evidence of intervention effectiveness, implementation strategies, and implementation outcomes and determinants.
Results
Data abstractors screened 3,500 articles published from January 2010 to January 2024. Of these, 25 articles reporting findings of 12 distinct mental health interventions met the criteria for inclusion. Interventions were based on a variety of therapeutic approaches such as cognitive behavioral therapy, collaborative problem solving, and motivational interviewing. Interventionists ranged from paraprofessionals such as community health workers to professionals such as registered nurses, nurse practitioners and licensed clinical social workers, in addition to others. Recipients of the interventions were predominantly white women; high risk groups including American Indian/Alaskan Native and Asian/Pacific Islander populations were underrepresented in studies. Studies demonstrated evidence of effectiveness in reducing symptoms of depression. Few studies systematically evaluated implementation outcomes or strategies, or followed standard recommendations for reporting implementation outcomes, limiting synthesis.
Conclusions
Mental health interventions delivered through perinatal home visiting programs show effectiveness at reducing depressive symptoms, and in a subset of studies, anxiety symptoms, though evidence for reduction in anxiety is more limited. Variations in how implementation measures were reported limited synthesis demonstrating that further research is needed in implementation.
目的围产期家访项目能够很好地为那些有不良心理健康结果的高危人群提供心理健康干预措施。本综述的目的是检查以家庭为基础的心理健康干预措施,其有效性,以及它们如何在围产期家访计划中实施。方法:遵循PRISMA指南,我们检索PubMed、CINAHL、PsycInfo和Social Work Abstracts,查找在美国作为围产期家访项目的一部分,在家庭环境中提供心理健康干预的实验或准实验研究的报告。提取的数据包括研究人口统计、设计、干预措施的特征、干预措施有效性的证据、实施策略、实施结果和决定因素。结果数据文摘人员筛选了2010年1月至2024年1月发表的3500篇论文。其中,有25篇文章报告了12种不同的心理健康干预措施的结果,符合纳入标准。干预措施基于多种治疗方法,如认知行为疗法、合作解决问题和动机访谈。干预人员的范围从社区卫生工作者等辅助专业人员到注册护士、执业护士和持牌临床社会工作者等专业人员。接受干预的主要是白人妇女;包括美洲印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民和亚洲/太平洋岛民在内的高风险群体在研究中代表性不足。研究证明了它在减轻抑郁症状方面的有效性。很少有研究系统地评估实施结果或战略,或遵循报告实施结果的标准建议,限制了综合。结论:通过围产期家访项目提供的心理健康干预显示出减轻抑郁症状的有效性,并且在一部分研究中显示出减轻焦虑症状的有效性,尽管减少焦虑的证据更为有限。报告实施措施方式的差异限制了综合,表明在实施方面需要进一步研究。
期刊介绍:
Archives of Women’s Mental Health is the official journal of the International Association for Women''s Mental Health, Marcé Society and the North American Society for Psychosocial Obstetrics and Gynecology (NASPOG). The exchange of knowledge between psychiatrists and obstetrician-gynecologists is one of the major aims of the journal. Its international scope includes psychodynamics, social and biological aspects of all psychiatric and psychosomatic disorders in women. The editors especially welcome interdisciplinary studies, focussing on the interface between psychiatry, psychosomatics, obstetrics and gynecology. Archives of Women’s Mental Health publishes rigorously reviewed research papers, short communications, case reports, review articles, invited editorials, historical perspectives, book reviews, letters to the editor, as well as conference abstracts. Only contributions written in English will be accepted. The journal assists clinicians, teachers and researchers to incorporate knowledge of all aspects of women’s mental health into current and future clinical care and research.