Investigating the Link Between Overcontrolled Traits and Functional Impairment: Determining Relations and Establishing Interpretive Guidelines.

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Douglas B Samuel, Abigail A Macomber, Meredith A Bucher, Caroline E Balling, Ronnie Hill
{"title":"Investigating the Link Between Overcontrolled Traits and Functional Impairment: Determining Relations and Establishing Interpretive Guidelines.","authors":"Douglas B Samuel, Abigail A Macomber, Meredith A Bucher, Caroline E Balling, Ronnie Hill","doi":"10.1177/10731911261417479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dimensional models that view personality pathology as maladaptive variants of general traits have proven useful and gained traction in diagnostic systems. In such a model, problems with the control and regulation of behavior exist on a spectrum of conscientiousness, ranging from undercontrol/impulsivity to overcontrol/compulsivity. The Five-Factor Obsessive Compulsive Inventory (FFOCI) is a promising measure to assess the traits of overcontrol that have long been included within the diagnostic category of Obsessive Compulsive Personality Disorder (OCPD). A key concern with such a model is determining where along an otherwise adaptive trait does overcontrol become problematic. The present study uses a 500-person sample, matched to adults in the 2020 U.S. Census, to determine normative values and provisional cut points for each scale. We then calculated bins of the FFOCI T scores (e.g., 60-64) and examined how well they connected with various functional outcomes (e.g., relational support, well-being, stress, and occupational performance, OCPD symptoms) using regression and mean comparisons. Together, these approaches identified levels where problematic outcomes were more likely. Overall, we established initial interpretive guidelines that allow clinicians to identify scores (> 65<i>t</i>) on the FFOCI that can guide therapists toward those aspects of overcontrol most in need of therapeutic intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"10731911261417479"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911261417479","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dimensional models that view personality pathology as maladaptive variants of general traits have proven useful and gained traction in diagnostic systems. In such a model, problems with the control and regulation of behavior exist on a spectrum of conscientiousness, ranging from undercontrol/impulsivity to overcontrol/compulsivity. The Five-Factor Obsessive Compulsive Inventory (FFOCI) is a promising measure to assess the traits of overcontrol that have long been included within the diagnostic category of Obsessive Compulsive Personality Disorder (OCPD). A key concern with such a model is determining where along an otherwise adaptive trait does overcontrol become problematic. The present study uses a 500-person sample, matched to adults in the 2020 U.S. Census, to determine normative values and provisional cut points for each scale. We then calculated bins of the FFOCI T scores (e.g., 60-64) and examined how well they connected with various functional outcomes (e.g., relational support, well-being, stress, and occupational performance, OCPD symptoms) using regression and mean comparisons. Together, these approaches identified levels where problematic outcomes were more likely. Overall, we established initial interpretive guidelines that allow clinicians to identify scores (> 65t) on the FFOCI that can guide therapists toward those aspects of overcontrol most in need of therapeutic intervention.

研究过度控制性状与功能损害之间的联系:确定关系并建立解释性指南。
将人格病理学视为一般特征的不适应变异的维度模型已被证明是有用的,并在诊断系统中获得了牵引力。在这种模型中,行为的控制和调节问题存在于责任心的范围内,从控制不足/冲动到控制过度/强迫。五因素强迫症量表(FFOCI)是一种很有前景的评估过度控制特征的方法,这种特征长期以来一直被纳入强迫症(OCPD)的诊断范畴。这种模型的一个关键问题是确定一个适应性特征在哪里会出现过度控制的问题。目前的研究使用了500人的样本,与2020年美国人口普查中的成年人相匹配,以确定每个量表的规范值和临时切点。然后,我们计算了FFOCI T得分(例如,60-64)的bin,并使用回归和均值比较检查了它们与各种功能结果(例如,关系支持、幸福感、压力、职业表现、OCPD症状)的联系程度。总之,这些方法确定了更有可能出现问题结果的水平。总的来说,我们建立了初步的解释性指南,允许临床医生在FFOCI上确定分数(bb0 - 65t),可以指导治疗师在最需要治疗干预的过度控制方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Assessment
Assessment PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Assessment publishes articles in the domain of applied clinical assessment. The emphasis of this journal is on publication of information of relevance to the use of assessment measures, including test development, validation, and interpretation practices. The scope of the journal includes research that can inform assessment practices in mental health, forensic, medical, and other applied settings. Papers that focus on the assessment of cognitive and neuropsychological functioning, personality, and psychopathology are invited. Most papers published in Assessment report the results of original empirical research, however integrative review articles and scholarly case studies will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书