Objective Memory Impairment in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: a Systematic Review and Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Trauma-Exposed Adult Populations.

Haris Sulejmani, Nada Pop-Jordanova
{"title":"Objective Memory Impairment in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: a Systematic Review and Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Trauma-Exposed Adult Populations.","authors":"Haris Sulejmani, Nada Pop-Jordanova","doi":"10.2478/prilozi-2026-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is traditionally conceptualized as a disorder of fear learning and emotional dysregulation; however, accumulating evidence indicates that objective cognitive dysfunction, particularly memory impairment, represents a core and enduring feature of the disorder. Prior quantitative syntheses have been limited by heterogeneous control groups, pooling of disparate cognitive outcomes, and inadequate handling of statistical dependence across outcomes. <b>Objective</b>: This systematic review and meta-analysis is aimed at determining whether trauma-exposed adults diagnosed with PTSD exhibit objective impairments in memory performance compared with trauma-exposed adults without PTSD. <b>Methods</b>: A comprehensive search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and Web of Science was conducted up to December 17, 2025. Eligible studies included trauma-exposed adults (≥18 years) with PTSD diagnosed using DSM or ICD criteria and a trauma-exposed non-PTSD comparator group. Objective neuropsychological measures of verbal episodic memory and working memory were extracted. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Standardized mean differences (Hedges' g) were pooled using multilevel random-effects meta-analytic models to account for within-study dependence. <b>Results</b>: Ninety studies met the criteria for the systematic review, of which 88 contributed quantitative data to the meta-analysis. Across studies, individuals with PTSD demonstrated significantly poorer memory performance compared with trauma-exposed controls without PTSD. Impairments were most consistent for verbal episodic memory and working memory, with effects observed across diverse trauma types and assessment instruments. Considerable heterogeneity was present but did not negate the overall pattern of PTSD-specific cognitive impairment. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of findings. Although funnel plot asymmetry suggested possible publication bias, trim-and-fill-adjusted estimates remained statistically significant. <b>Conclusions</b>: Trauma-exposed adults with PTSD exhibit reliable and clinically meaningful impairments in objective memory performance beyond the effects of trauma exposure alone. These findings support conceptualizations of PTSD as a disorder involving maladaptive memory processing and underscore the importance of incorporating cognitive assessment and intervention into PTSD research and clinical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":74492,"journal":{"name":"Prilozi (Makedonska akademija na naukite i umetnostite. Oddelenie za medicinski nauki)","volume":"47 1","pages":"25-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prilozi (Makedonska akademija na naukite i umetnostite. Oddelenie za medicinski nauki)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/prilozi-2026-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is traditionally conceptualized as a disorder of fear learning and emotional dysregulation; however, accumulating evidence indicates that objective cognitive dysfunction, particularly memory impairment, represents a core and enduring feature of the disorder. Prior quantitative syntheses have been limited by heterogeneous control groups, pooling of disparate cognitive outcomes, and inadequate handling of statistical dependence across outcomes. Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis is aimed at determining whether trauma-exposed adults diagnosed with PTSD exhibit objective impairments in memory performance compared with trauma-exposed adults without PTSD. Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and Web of Science was conducted up to December 17, 2025. Eligible studies included trauma-exposed adults (≥18 years) with PTSD diagnosed using DSM or ICD criteria and a trauma-exposed non-PTSD comparator group. Objective neuropsychological measures of verbal episodic memory and working memory were extracted. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Standardized mean differences (Hedges' g) were pooled using multilevel random-effects meta-analytic models to account for within-study dependence. Results: Ninety studies met the criteria for the systematic review, of which 88 contributed quantitative data to the meta-analysis. Across studies, individuals with PTSD demonstrated significantly poorer memory performance compared with trauma-exposed controls without PTSD. Impairments were most consistent for verbal episodic memory and working memory, with effects observed across diverse trauma types and assessment instruments. Considerable heterogeneity was present but did not negate the overall pattern of PTSD-specific cognitive impairment. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of findings. Although funnel plot asymmetry suggested possible publication bias, trim-and-fill-adjusted estimates remained statistically significant. Conclusions: Trauma-exposed adults with PTSD exhibit reliable and clinically meaningful impairments in objective memory performance beyond the effects of trauma exposure alone. These findings support conceptualizations of PTSD as a disorder involving maladaptive memory processing and underscore the importance of incorporating cognitive assessment and intervention into PTSD research and clinical care.

目的创伤后应激障碍的记忆障碍:创伤暴露成人人群的系统回顾和多水平荟萃分析。
背景:创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)传统上被认为是一种恐惧、学习和情绪失调的障碍;然而,越来越多的证据表明,客观认知功能障碍,特别是记忆障碍,是该疾病的核心和持久特征。先前的定量综合受到异质性对照组、不同认知结果的汇集以及对结果之间统计依赖性处理不足的限制。目的:本系统回顾和荟萃分析旨在确定创伤暴露的诊断为创伤后应激障碍的成年人与创伤暴露的无创伤后应激障碍的成年人相比,是否在记忆表现上表现出客观障碍。方法:综合检索截至2025年12月17日的PubMed/MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO和Web of Science数据库。符合条件的研究包括使用DSM或ICD标准诊断为PTSD的创伤暴露成人(≥18岁)和创伤暴露非创伤后应激障碍比较组。提取言语情景记忆和工作记忆的客观神经心理学测量。偏倚风险采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行评估。标准化平均差异(Hedges' g)使用多水平随机效应荟萃分析模型进行汇总,以解释研究内依赖性。结果:90项研究符合系统评价的标准,其中88项为meta分析提供了定量数据。在所有研究中,与没有创伤后应激障碍的对照组相比,患有创伤后应激障碍的个体表现出明显较差的记忆表现。言语情景记忆和工作记忆的损伤是最一致的,在不同的创伤类型和评估工具中观察到的影响。存在相当大的异质性,但并不否定创伤后应激障碍特异性认知障碍的总体模式。敏感性分析证实了结果的稳健性。尽管漏斗图不对称表明可能存在发表偏倚,但调整后的估计仍然具有统计学意义。结论:创伤暴露的成年PTSD患者在客观记忆表现上表现出可靠且具有临床意义的损伤,而不仅仅是创伤暴露的影响。这些发现支持了PTSD作为一种涉及不适应记忆处理的障碍的概念,并强调了将认知评估和干预纳入PTSD研究和临床护理的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书