Rethinking Success to Reduce Work–Life Tensions

IF 3.5 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Jeff Cain , Krisy-Ann Thornby
{"title":"Rethinking Success to Reduce Work–Life Tensions","authors":"Jeff Cain ,&nbsp;Krisy-Ann Thornby","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2026.101975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Balancing professional success with psychological well-being can be a challenge for faculty and professional staff in pharmacy education, as the pursuit of “balance” often creates tension across both personal and professional domains. This struggle stems from a bifurcated view of success that elevates productivity and career achievement above well-being. As work demands increasingly spill into personal time, faculty face an ongoing psychological negotiation of identity, priorities, and purpose. We argue that while the opportunity costs of career choices are inevitable, this tension can be mitigated by adopting a more holistic definition of success. Rather than delaying fulfillment until professional milestones are achieved, we propose embracing a mindset centered on life satisfaction, understood as a measure of well-being across interconnected domains such as career, relationships, health, leisure, and personal growth. Evidence from the behavioral sciences supports this integrated approach, demonstrating that life and work engagement are mutually reinforcing. Viewing success as a single, encompassing objective rather than as competing segments offers a clearer sense of direction and helps guide decisions according to one’s personal values. To support this shift, faculty should recognize the psychological forces that shape their choices. We discuss how the paradox of limitation, arrival fallacy, and social comparison theory can distort work–life decisions. By intentionally reframing success in the context of life satisfaction, faculty can choose to craft a career that supports meaningful, holistic, and sustained fulfillment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":"90 4","pages":"Article 101975"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002945926010739","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Balancing professional success with psychological well-being can be a challenge for faculty and professional staff in pharmacy education, as the pursuit of “balance” often creates tension across both personal and professional domains. This struggle stems from a bifurcated view of success that elevates productivity and career achievement above well-being. As work demands increasingly spill into personal time, faculty face an ongoing psychological negotiation of identity, priorities, and purpose. We argue that while the opportunity costs of career choices are inevitable, this tension can be mitigated by adopting a more holistic definition of success. Rather than delaying fulfillment until professional milestones are achieved, we propose embracing a mindset centered on life satisfaction, understood as a measure of well-being across interconnected domains such as career, relationships, health, leisure, and personal growth. Evidence from the behavioral sciences supports this integrated approach, demonstrating that life and work engagement are mutually reinforcing. Viewing success as a single, encompassing objective rather than as competing segments offers a clearer sense of direction and helps guide decisions according to one’s personal values. To support this shift, faculty should recognize the psychological forces that shape their choices. We discuss how the paradox of limitation, arrival fallacy, and social comparison theory can distort work–life decisions. By intentionally reframing success in the context of life satisfaction, faculty can choose to craft a career that supports meaningful, holistic, and sustained fulfillment.
重新思考成功,减少工作与生活的紧张关系。
平衡职业成功和心理健康对药学教育的教职员工来说是一个挑战,因为追求“平衡”往往会在个人和专业领域造成紧张。这种挣扎源于对成功的双重看法,即把生产力和事业成就看得比幸福更重要。如果工作需求越来越多地渗透到个人时间,教师就会面临身份、优先事项和目标的持续心理谈判。我们认为,虽然职业选择的机会成本是不可避免的,但这种矛盾可以通过采用更全面的成功定义来缓解。我们建议不要等到职业上的里程碑实现后再去实现,而是要拥抱一种以生活满意度为中心的心态,将其理解为一种跨越职业、人际关系、健康、休闲和个人成长等相互关联领域的幸福衡量标准。行为科学的证据支持这种综合方法,表明生活和工作的投入是相辅相成的。将成功视为一个单一的、包含的目标,而不是相互竞争的部分,这能让你有更清晰的方向感,并有助于根据个人价值观来指导决策。为了支持这种转变,教师们应该认识到一些影响他们选择的心理力量。我们讨论了限制悖论、到达谬论和社会比较理论如何扭曲工作与生活的决定。通过有意识地在生活满意度的背景下重新定义成功,教师可以选择创造一种支持有意义的、全面的、持续的成就感的职业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
15.20%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors. After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书