{"title":"Rethinking Success to Reduce Work–Life Tensions","authors":"Jeff Cain , Krisy-Ann Thornby","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2026.101975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Balancing professional success with psychological well-being can be a challenge for faculty and professional staff in pharmacy education, as the pursuit of “balance” often creates tension across both personal and professional domains. This struggle stems from a bifurcated view of success that elevates productivity and career achievement above well-being. As work demands increasingly spill into personal time, faculty face an ongoing psychological negotiation of identity, priorities, and purpose. We argue that while the opportunity costs of career choices are inevitable, this tension can be mitigated by adopting a more holistic definition of success. Rather than delaying fulfillment until professional milestones are achieved, we propose embracing a mindset centered on life satisfaction, understood as a measure of well-being across interconnected domains such as career, relationships, health, leisure, and personal growth. Evidence from the behavioral sciences supports this integrated approach, demonstrating that life and work engagement are mutually reinforcing. Viewing success as a single, encompassing objective rather than as competing segments offers a clearer sense of direction and helps guide decisions according to one’s personal values. To support this shift, faculty should recognize the psychological forces that shape their choices. We discuss how the paradox of limitation, arrival fallacy, and social comparison theory can distort work–life decisions. By intentionally reframing success in the context of life satisfaction, faculty can choose to craft a career that supports meaningful, holistic, and sustained fulfillment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":"90 4","pages":"Article 101975"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002945926010739","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Balancing professional success with psychological well-being can be a challenge for faculty and professional staff in pharmacy education, as the pursuit of “balance” often creates tension across both personal and professional domains. This struggle stems from a bifurcated view of success that elevates productivity and career achievement above well-being. As work demands increasingly spill into personal time, faculty face an ongoing psychological negotiation of identity, priorities, and purpose. We argue that while the opportunity costs of career choices are inevitable, this tension can be mitigated by adopting a more holistic definition of success. Rather than delaying fulfillment until professional milestones are achieved, we propose embracing a mindset centered on life satisfaction, understood as a measure of well-being across interconnected domains such as career, relationships, health, leisure, and personal growth. Evidence from the behavioral sciences supports this integrated approach, demonstrating that life and work engagement are mutually reinforcing. Viewing success as a single, encompassing objective rather than as competing segments offers a clearer sense of direction and helps guide decisions according to one’s personal values. To support this shift, faculty should recognize the psychological forces that shape their choices. We discuss how the paradox of limitation, arrival fallacy, and social comparison theory can distort work–life decisions. By intentionally reframing success in the context of life satisfaction, faculty can choose to craft a career that supports meaningful, holistic, and sustained fulfillment.
期刊介绍:
The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors.
After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.