Submucosal against Intramuscular Administration of Dexamethasone in Treatment of Postoperative Edema after Odontectomy of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars.

Spiro Spasovski, Edvard Janev, Zaklina Menceva, Mirjana Markovska-Arsovska, Ljuba Simjanovska, Vlatko Kokolanski, Mirjana Popovska
{"title":"Submucosal against Intramuscular Administration of Dexamethasone in Treatment of Postoperative Edema after Odontectomy of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars.","authors":"Spiro Spasovski, Edvard Janev, Zaklina Menceva, Mirjana Markovska-Arsovska, Ljuba Simjanovska, Vlatko Kokolanski, Mirjana Popovska","doi":"10.2478/prilozi-2026-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim</b>: To clinically evaluate the efficacy of Dexamethasone depending on the method of administration in the treatment of postoperative complications following odontectomy of lower impacted third molars. <b>Materials and Methods</b>: At the Clinic for Oral Surgery at USKC \"St. Panteleimon\" in Skopje, North Macedonia, 45 patients, 20 to 40 years, indicated for odontectomy of lower impacted third molars, were included. 15 patients were treated with DXP (Dexamethasone), ampule of 4mg/1ml, applied submucosally (SM). Another 15 patients were treated with DXP administered intramuscularly (IM) into the deltoid muscle. No DXP was applied to the control group (CG). Edema was monitored by measuring three facial lines: tragus to labial commissure (Tr-Co), tragus to gnathion (Tr-Gn), and lateral eye canthus to angulus mandibulae (Cn-Am). The clinical effects in the three study groups were monitored at 24 hours (T1), 48 hours (T2), and 7 days (T3) post-op. <b>Results</b>: Cn-Am direction in T1, showed significantly larger edema in the CG vs the examined groups. In all time points there were no statistically significant differences between the examined groups (p>0.05). In T1 and T2, in the Tr-Co direction, the results showed the biggest reduction of the edema with a statistically significant difference (p=0.012) in IM vs SM application at T2. T3 showed least edema in the SM group. Tr-Gn direction, at T1, a significant difference in edema dimensions was found between the IM and CG (p=0.015), indicating a significantly smaller measured edema in the IM group. Identical findings were seen at T2. T3 showed better results in edema control in the SM vs. other groups. <b>Conclusion</b>: The intramuscular application technique of DXP was more effective than the submucosal technique across all measurement lines and time points in managing postoperative edema following surgical extraction of lower impacted third molars.</p>","PeriodicalId":74492,"journal":{"name":"Prilozi (Makedonska akademija na naukite i umetnostite. Oddelenie za medicinski nauki)","volume":"47 1","pages":"63-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prilozi (Makedonska akademija na naukite i umetnostite. Oddelenie za medicinski nauki)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/prilozi-2026-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To clinically evaluate the efficacy of Dexamethasone depending on the method of administration in the treatment of postoperative complications following odontectomy of lower impacted third molars. Materials and Methods: At the Clinic for Oral Surgery at USKC "St. Panteleimon" in Skopje, North Macedonia, 45 patients, 20 to 40 years, indicated for odontectomy of lower impacted third molars, were included. 15 patients were treated with DXP (Dexamethasone), ampule of 4mg/1ml, applied submucosally (SM). Another 15 patients were treated with DXP administered intramuscularly (IM) into the deltoid muscle. No DXP was applied to the control group (CG). Edema was monitored by measuring three facial lines: tragus to labial commissure (Tr-Co), tragus to gnathion (Tr-Gn), and lateral eye canthus to angulus mandibulae (Cn-Am). The clinical effects in the three study groups were monitored at 24 hours (T1), 48 hours (T2), and 7 days (T3) post-op. Results: Cn-Am direction in T1, showed significantly larger edema in the CG vs the examined groups. In all time points there were no statistically significant differences between the examined groups (p>0.05). In T1 and T2, in the Tr-Co direction, the results showed the biggest reduction of the edema with a statistically significant difference (p=0.012) in IM vs SM application at T2. T3 showed least edema in the SM group. Tr-Gn direction, at T1, a significant difference in edema dimensions was found between the IM and CG (p=0.015), indicating a significantly smaller measured edema in the IM group. Identical findings were seen at T2. T3 showed better results in edema control in the SM vs. other groups. Conclusion: The intramuscular application technique of DXP was more effective than the submucosal technique across all measurement lines and time points in managing postoperative edema following surgical extraction of lower impacted third molars.

肌注地塞米松治疗下颌阻生第三磨牙切除术后水肿的黏膜下对照研究。
目的:临床评价不同给药方式地塞米松治疗下阻生第三磨牙摘牙术后并发症的疗效。材料和方法:在马其顿北部斯科普里的USKC“St. Panteleimon”口腔外科诊所,纳入了45名20至40岁的患者,他们需要切除下阻生第三磨牙。15例患者采用地塞米松(Dexamethasone, DXP),剂量为4mg/1ml,粘膜下应用(SM)。另外15例患者接受肌内注射(IM) DXP治疗。对照组(CG)不应用DXP。通过测量耳屏-唇连线(Tr-Co)、耳屏-咬合线(Tr-Gn)和侧眼眦-下颌角(Cn-Am)三条面部线监测水肿情况。在术后24小时(T1)、48小时(T2)和7天(T3)监测三个研究组的临床疗效。结果:T1 n- am方向,CG组水肿明显大于检查组。在所有时间点上,各组间差异均无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。在T1和T2时,在Tr-Co方向,结果显示IM与SM在T2时应用的水肿减少最大,差异有统计学意义(p=0.012)。SM组T3水肿最小。Tr-Gn方向,在T1时,IM组与CG组的水肿尺寸差异有统计学意义(p=0.015),说明IM组的水肿测量值明显小于CG组。T2也有相同的表现。与其他组相比,SM组T3在水肿控制方面表现出更好的效果。结论:DXP肌内应用技术在所有测量线和时间点上都比粘膜下应用技术更有效地控制下阻生第三磨牙拔牙术后水肿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书