The quality and reliability of Kawasaki disease-related short videos on TikTok and Bilibili: a cross-platform content analysis using GQS, mDISCERN, and JAMA benchmarks.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Qiwei Wang, Weiting Jiang, Junwen Wang
{"title":"The quality and reliability of Kawasaki disease-related short videos on TikTok and Bilibili: a cross-platform content analysis using GQS, mDISCERN, and JAMA benchmarks.","authors":"Qiwei Wang, Weiting Jiang, Junwen Wang","doi":"10.1186/s13052-026-02247-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND: Kawasaki disease (KD) represents the leading cause of acquired heart disease in children, with timely diagnosis and treatment being crucial to prevent severe coronary complications. The widespread use of short-video platforms such as TikTok and Bilibili has made them increasingly important sources of health information for the public. However, the quality and reliability of KD-related content on these platforms remain largely unassessed. This study aimed to evaluate the educational quality and informational reliability of short videos about KD on TikTok and Bilibili, two of the most popular social media platforms in China. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the top 100 videos retrieved for KD on each platform. A total of 186 videos were assessed using the Global Quality Scale (GQS), modified DISCERN (mDISCERN), and JAMA benchmark criteria. Uploaders were categorized as professionals or non-professionals. Video characteristics, engagement metrics, and content coverage were analyzed. RESULTS: Overall quality was suboptimal (median scores: GQS = 2, mDISCERN = 2, JAMA = 2). Videos from professionals scored significantly higher than those from non-professionals (p < 0.001). TikTok videos were shorter but had higher engagement and GQS scores than Bilibili videos (p < 0.001). Content coverage was skewed: clinical manifestations were discussed in > 80% of videos, while prognosis and prevention were covered in < 25%. Engagement metrics showed negligible correlation with quality scores. CONCLUSIONS: KD-related short videos on popular Chinese platforms exhibit notable quality deficiencies and content gaps. Incomplete or low-quality online information may delay caregiver recognition and timely medical evaluation, potentially increasing the risk of coronary complications in children with KD. Although professional involvement is associated with better quality, overall reliability remains limited. These findings highlight the need for improved content governance and tailored strategies for accurate health communication on social media. </p>","PeriodicalId":14511,"journal":{"name":"Italian Journal of Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13126903/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Italian Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-026-02247-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Kawasaki disease (KD) represents the leading cause of acquired heart disease in children, with timely diagnosis and treatment being crucial to prevent severe coronary complications. The widespread use of short-video platforms such as TikTok and Bilibili has made them increasingly important sources of health information for the public. However, the quality and reliability of KD-related content on these platforms remain largely unassessed. This study aimed to evaluate the educational quality and informational reliability of short videos about KD on TikTok and Bilibili, two of the most popular social media platforms in China. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the top 100 videos retrieved for KD on each platform. A total of 186 videos were assessed using the Global Quality Scale (GQS), modified DISCERN (mDISCERN), and JAMA benchmark criteria. Uploaders were categorized as professionals or non-professionals. Video characteristics, engagement metrics, and content coverage were analyzed. RESULTS: Overall quality was suboptimal (median scores: GQS = 2, mDISCERN = 2, JAMA = 2). Videos from professionals scored significantly higher than those from non-professionals (p < 0.001). TikTok videos were shorter but had higher engagement and GQS scores than Bilibili videos (p < 0.001). Content coverage was skewed: clinical manifestations were discussed in > 80% of videos, while prognosis and prevention were covered in < 25%. Engagement metrics showed negligible correlation with quality scores. CONCLUSIONS: KD-related short videos on popular Chinese platforms exhibit notable quality deficiencies and content gaps. Incomplete or low-quality online information may delay caregiver recognition and timely medical evaluation, potentially increasing the risk of coronary complications in children with KD. Although professional involvement is associated with better quality, overall reliability remains limited. These findings highlight the need for improved content governance and tailored strategies for accurate health communication on social media.

TikTok和Bilibili上川崎病相关短视频的质量和可靠性:基于GQS、mDISCERN和JAMA基准的跨平台内容分析。
背景:川崎病(KD)是儿童获得性心脏病的主要原因,及时诊断和治疗对于预防严重的冠状动脉并发症至关重要。抖音和哔哩哔哩等短视频平台的广泛使用,使它们成为公众越来越重要的健康信息来源。然而,这些平台上与kd相关内容的质量和可靠性在很大程度上仍未得到评估。​方法:我们对每个平台上检索到的前100个KD视频进行了横断面分析。使用全球质量量表(GQS)、改进的DISCERN (mDISCERN)和JAMA基准标准对186个视频进行评估。上传者分为专业人士和非专业人士。我们分析了视频特征、用户粘性指标和内容覆盖率。结果:总体质量次优(中位评分:GQS = 2, mDISCERN = 2, JAMA = 2)。来自专业人士的视频得分明显高于来自非专业人士的视频(p 80%),而预后和预防在
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
13.90%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Italian Journal of Pediatrics is an open access peer-reviewed journal that includes all aspects of pediatric medicine. The journal also covers health service and public health research that addresses primary care issues. The journal provides a high-quality forum for pediatricians and other healthcare professionals to report and discuss up-to-the-minute research and expert reviews in the field of pediatric medicine. The journal will continue to develop the range of articles published to enable this invaluable resource to stay at the forefront of the field. Italian Journal of Pediatrics, which commenced in 1975 as Rivista Italiana di Pediatria, provides a high-quality forum for pediatricians and other healthcare professionals to report and discuss up-to-the-minute research and expert reviews in the field of pediatric medicine. The journal will continue to develop the range of articles published to enable this invaluable resource to stay at the forefront of the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书