Comprehensive clinicopathological and prognostic analysis of primary pulmonary lymphoepithelial carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 PATHOLOGY
Meihong Yao, Wen Li, Yingying Wang, Zui Chen, Yuye Pan, Kailin Zhang, Zihan Lu, Danna Chen, Yuhui Zheng, Yinghong Yang
{"title":"Comprehensive clinicopathological and prognostic analysis of primary pulmonary lymphoepithelial carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Meihong Yao, Wen Li, Yingying Wang, Zui Chen, Yuye Pan, Kailin Zhang, Zihan Lu, Danna Chen, Yuhui Zheng, Yinghong Yang","doi":"10.1186/s13000-026-01778-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND: Primary pulmonary lymphoepithelial carcinoma (PPLEC) is an extremely rare subtype of lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC). This study aims to comprehensively characterize clinicopathological and molecular characteristics, evaluate treatment strategies, and identify prognostic factors of PPLEC. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted on 152 pathologically confirmed PPLEC patients in our center between April 2012 and December 2024. Data on clinicopathological characteristics, driver gene mutations (n = 40), PD-L1 expression (n = 65), treatment regimens, and survival outcomes were collected. Survival analyses were performed with Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression model. RESULTS: The median age at diagnosis in the PPLELC cohort was 55 years, with a slight female predominance (52.6%) and strong nonsmoking association (75.7%). Despite the presence of CYFRA21-1, most of the serum tumor marker levels were normal. Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining revealed characteristic epithelial differentiation with high expression of CK5/6 (100.0%), P40 (98.5%), P63 (96.9%), and pan-CK (95.5%). All patients (100%) were EBV-encoded RNA (EBER) -in situ hybridization (ISH) positive. Driver mutations were rare (2 of 40, 5.0%), while PD-L1 expression was prevalent (60 of 65, 92.3%). The TNM stage distributions were I (38.2%), II (17.8%), III (28.9%), and IV (14.5%). Early-stage patients who underwent surgical resection (n = 102) achieved a 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of 91%. For locally advanced PPLEC (n = 14), neoadjuvant therapy is a potential strategy with an objective response rate (ORR) of 50.0%. Compared with chemotherapy alone, combination therapies yielded superior outcomes in advanced-stage patients (n = 30). Multivariate survival analysis revealed TNM stage was the independent prognostic factor for progression-free survival (PFS). CONCLUSIONS: PPLEC is a distinct LUSC subtype characterized by an Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) association, a nonsmoking phenotype, epithelial differentiation, few driver mutations, and high PD-L1 expression. Surgical resection plays a pivotal role in the management of early-stage disease, whereas multimodal therapeutic approaches have considerable potential for advanced-stage cases. TNM stage was the independent prognostic factor for PFS. These findings provide valuable insights for optimizing management strategies for this rare malignant entity. </p>","PeriodicalId":11237,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic Pathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13112634/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13000-026-01778-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Primary pulmonary lymphoepithelial carcinoma (PPLEC) is an extremely rare subtype of lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC). This study aims to comprehensively characterize clinicopathological and molecular characteristics, evaluate treatment strategies, and identify prognostic factors of PPLEC. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted on 152 pathologically confirmed PPLEC patients in our center between April 2012 and December 2024. Data on clinicopathological characteristics, driver gene mutations (n = 40), PD-L1 expression (n = 65), treatment regimens, and survival outcomes were collected. Survival analyses were performed with Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression model. RESULTS: The median age at diagnosis in the PPLELC cohort was 55 years, with a slight female predominance (52.6%) and strong nonsmoking association (75.7%). Despite the presence of CYFRA21-1, most of the serum tumor marker levels were normal. Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining revealed characteristic epithelial differentiation with high expression of CK5/6 (100.0%), P40 (98.5%), P63 (96.9%), and pan-CK (95.5%). All patients (100%) were EBV-encoded RNA (EBER) -in situ hybridization (ISH) positive. Driver mutations were rare (2 of 40, 5.0%), while PD-L1 expression was prevalent (60 of 65, 92.3%). The TNM stage distributions were I (38.2%), II (17.8%), III (28.9%), and IV (14.5%). Early-stage patients who underwent surgical resection (n = 102) achieved a 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of 91%. For locally advanced PPLEC (n = 14), neoadjuvant therapy is a potential strategy with an objective response rate (ORR) of 50.0%. Compared with chemotherapy alone, combination therapies yielded superior outcomes in advanced-stage patients (n = 30). Multivariate survival analysis revealed TNM stage was the independent prognostic factor for progression-free survival (PFS). CONCLUSIONS: PPLEC is a distinct LUSC subtype characterized by an Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) association, a nonsmoking phenotype, epithelial differentiation, few driver mutations, and high PD-L1 expression. Surgical resection plays a pivotal role in the management of early-stage disease, whereas multimodal therapeutic approaches have considerable potential for advanced-stage cases. TNM stage was the independent prognostic factor for PFS. These findings provide valuable insights for optimizing management strategies for this rare malignant entity.

原发性肺淋巴上皮癌的综合临床病理和预后分析:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景:原发性肺淋巴上皮癌(PPLEC)是一种极为罕见的肺鳞状细胞癌(LUSC)亚型。本研究旨在全面表征PPLEC的临床病理和分子特征,评估治疗策略,并确定预后因素。方法:回顾性研究2012年4月至2024年12月在我中心就诊的152例病理证实的PPLEC患者。收集临床病理特征、驱动基因突变(n = 40)、PD-L1表达(n = 65)、治疗方案和生存结果的数据。生存率分析采用Kaplan-Meier分析和Cox回归模型。结果:PPLELC队列的中位诊断年龄为55岁,女性占52.6%,非吸烟人群占75.7%。尽管存在CYFRA21-1,但大多数血清肿瘤标志物水平正常。免疫组化(IHC)染色显示特征性上皮分化,CK5/6(100.0%)、P40(98.5%)、P63(96.9%)和pan-CK(95.5%)高表达。所有患者(100%)ebv编码RNA (EBER)原位杂交(ISH)阳性。驱动突变罕见(40例中2例,5.0%),而PD-L1表达普遍(65例中60例,92.3%)。TNM分期分布依次为I(38.2%)、II(17.8%)、III(28.9%)、IV(14.5%)。接受手术切除的早期患者(n = 102)的5年总生存率为91%。对于局部晚期PPLEC (n = 14),新辅助治疗是一种潜在的策略,客观缓解率(ORR)为50.0%。与单独化疗相比,联合治疗在晚期患者中取得了更好的结果(n = 30)。多变量生存分析显示TNM分期是无进展生存(PFS)的独立预后因素。结论:PPLEC是一种独特的LUSC亚型,其特征是Epstein-Barr病毒(EBV)关联、非吸烟表型、上皮分化、很少的驱动突变和高PD-L1表达。手术切除在早期疾病的治疗中起着关键作用,而多模式治疗方法在晚期病例中具有相当大的潜力。TNM分期是PFS的独立预后因素。这些发现为优化这种罕见恶性肿瘤的治疗策略提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diagnostic Pathology
Diagnostic Pathology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
93
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Diagnostic Pathology is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that considers research in surgical and clinical pathology, immunology, and biology, with a special focus on cutting-edge approaches in diagnostic pathology and tissue-based therapy. The journal covers all aspects of surgical pathology, including classic diagnostic pathology, prognosis-related diagnosis (tumor stages, prognosis markers, such as MIB-percentage, hormone receptors, etc.), and therapy-related findings. The journal also focuses on the technological aspects of pathology, including molecular biology techniques, morphometry aspects (stereology, DNA analysis, syntactic structure analysis), communication aspects (telecommunication, virtual microscopy, virtual pathology institutions, etc.), and electronic education and quality assurance (for example interactive publication, on-line references with automated updating, etc.).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书