A Critical Four-Hour Therapeutic Window Predicts Delayed Encephalopathy Risk After Carbon Monoxide Poisoning: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 5 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Shaokun Wang, Yanxia Gao, Jie Ran, Yan Zhang, Yanling Chen, Hongyi Yan, Li Pang
{"title":"A Critical Four-Hour Therapeutic Window Predicts Delayed Encephalopathy Risk After Carbon Monoxide Poisoning: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Shaokun Wang, Yanxia Gao, Jie Ran, Yan Zhang, Yanling Chen, Hongyi Yan, Li Pang","doi":"10.1002/cns.70837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The therapeutic window for preventing delayed encephalopathy after carbon monoxide poisoning (DEACMP) remains unclear. We aimed to define this temporal risk relationship and establish an intervention threshold using machine learning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicenter retrospective cohort study (n = 1755), a gradient boosting model for predicting DEACMP was developed (n = 1654) and externally validated (n = 101). Performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and interpreted using Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The exposure-to-treatment interval was the most powerful predictor of DEACMP risk. Intervention within four hours emerged as the most critical variable influencing risk (SHAP analysis). The model demonstrated robust discrimination in the training (AUC = 0.944, 95% CI, 0.926-0.960), internal validation (AUC = 0.849, 95% CI, 0.785-0.905), and external validation (AUC = 0.872, 95% CI, 0.772-0.946) sets.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Treatment delay is the primary modifiable risk factor for DEACMP following CO poisoning. The identified critical four-hour therapeutic window provides the first quantitative, evidence-based benchmark to inform clinical guidelines and optimize emergency response strategies aimed at preventing delayed neurological sequelae.</p>","PeriodicalId":154,"journal":{"name":"CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics","volume":"32 3","pages":"e70837"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13093570/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cns.70837","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: The therapeutic window for preventing delayed encephalopathy after carbon monoxide poisoning (DEACMP) remains unclear. We aimed to define this temporal risk relationship and establish an intervention threshold using machine learning.

Methods: In this multicenter retrospective cohort study (n = 1755), a gradient boosting model for predicting DEACMP was developed (n = 1654) and externally validated (n = 101). Performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and interpreted using Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP).

Results: The exposure-to-treatment interval was the most powerful predictor of DEACMP risk. Intervention within four hours emerged as the most critical variable influencing risk (SHAP analysis). The model demonstrated robust discrimination in the training (AUC = 0.944, 95% CI, 0.926-0.960), internal validation (AUC = 0.849, 95% CI, 0.785-0.905), and external validation (AUC = 0.872, 95% CI, 0.772-0.946) sets.

Conclusion: Treatment delay is the primary modifiable risk factor for DEACMP following CO poisoning. The identified critical four-hour therapeutic window provides the first quantitative, evidence-based benchmark to inform clinical guidelines and optimize emergency response strategies aimed at preventing delayed neurological sequelae.

一个关键的4小时治疗窗口预测一氧化碳中毒后迟发性脑病风险:一项多中心回顾性队列研究。
目的:预防一氧化碳中毒后迟发性脑病(DEACMP)的治疗窗口期尚不清楚。我们的目标是定义这种时间风险关系,并使用机器学习建立干预阈值。方法:在这项多中心回顾性队列研究中(n = 1755),建立了预测DEACMP的梯度增强模型(n = 1654),并进行了外部验证(n = 101)。使用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)评估表现,并使用Shapley加性解释(SHAP)进行解释。结果:暴露至治疗时间间隔是DEACMP风险的最有效预测因子。四小时内的干预是影响风险的最关键变量(SHAP分析)。该模型在训练集(AUC = 0.944, 95% CI, 0.926-0.960)、内部验证集(AUC = 0.849, 95% CI, 0.785-0.905)和外部验证集(AUC = 0.872, 95% CI, 0.772-0.946)中表现出稳健的辨别能力。结论:治疗延误是CO中毒后DEACMP的主要可改变危险因素。确定的关键4小时治疗窗口提供了第一个定量的、基于证据的基准,为临床指南提供信息,并优化旨在预防延迟性神经系统后遗症的应急响应策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics
CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
12.70%
发文量
240
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics provides a medium for rapid publication of original clinical, experimental, and translational research papers, timely reviews and reports of novel findings of therapeutic relevance to the central nervous system, as well as papers related to clinical pharmacology, drug development and novel methodologies for drug evaluation. The journal focuses on neurological and psychiatric diseases such as stroke, Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, depression, schizophrenia, epilepsy, and drug abuse.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书