Marine foundation species facilitate biodiversity: systematic and quantitative syntheses identify trait-based standards to understand seascape functionality

IF 10.9 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
Biological Reviews Pub Date : 2026-07-02 Epub Date: 2026-03-21 DOI:10.1002/brv.70161
Thomas Benoit, Aurélien Boyé, Mathieu Chevalier, Bastien Mourguiart, Cédric Bacher, Victor L. Jardim, Anaëlle Bizien, Martin P. Marzloff
{"title":"Marine foundation species facilitate biodiversity: systematic and quantitative syntheses identify trait-based standards to understand seascape functionality","authors":"Thomas Benoit,&nbsp;Aurélien Boyé,&nbsp;Mathieu Chevalier,&nbsp;Bastien Mourguiart,&nbsp;Cédric Bacher,&nbsp;Victor L. Jardim,&nbsp;Anaëlle Bizien,&nbsp;Martin P. Marzloff","doi":"10.1002/brv.70161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Marine foundation species play a critical role in shaping seascapes and supporting biodiversity through their physical structure and biological activity. However, global changes can alter foundation species and subsequently induce profound changes in ecosystem functions and integrity. To understand better how foundation species influence biodiversity, we first conducted a systematic review of 311 articles that either compared biodiversity metrics associated with foundation species or examined relationships between biodiversity and foundation species traits (at the individual or habitat scale). A subsequent meta-analysis on a subset of suitable articles showed that foundation species generally enhance species richness by an average of 72%, although the strength and nature of this effect vary across scales and taxa. To understand these variations better, we synthesised the range of traits associated with foundation species and how these relate to various diversity metrics. While many traits are measured at both individual and habitat scales, inconsistencies across studies and foundation species groups prevent a formal assessment of functional trade-offs across marine foundation species. Despite high variability in trait–richness relationships, both common (e.g. density) and more specific (e.g. interstitial space) traits can serve as reliable proxies for species richness when capturing facilitative processes at the relevant scale for the response community. To reconcile this diversity of traits, we classify foundation species traits into 26 standardised categories, which constitutes a valuable framework to consolidate the interoperability of future research on the effects of foundation species on biodiversity. This classification and the associated database on foundation species–biodiversity relationships set a baseline for a comprehensive assessment of how multiple foundation species shape heterogeneous seascapes, which is essential for predicting the effects of habitat alteration or restoration on coastal biodiversity.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":133,"journal":{"name":"Biological Reviews","volume":"101 4","pages":"1960-1986"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/brv.70161","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Marine foundation species play a critical role in shaping seascapes and supporting biodiversity through their physical structure and biological activity. However, global changes can alter foundation species and subsequently induce profound changes in ecosystem functions and integrity. To understand better how foundation species influence biodiversity, we first conducted a systematic review of 311 articles that either compared biodiversity metrics associated with foundation species or examined relationships between biodiversity and foundation species traits (at the individual or habitat scale). A subsequent meta-analysis on a subset of suitable articles showed that foundation species generally enhance species richness by an average of 72%, although the strength and nature of this effect vary across scales and taxa. To understand these variations better, we synthesised the range of traits associated with foundation species and how these relate to various diversity metrics. While many traits are measured at both individual and habitat scales, inconsistencies across studies and foundation species groups prevent a formal assessment of functional trade-offs across marine foundation species. Despite high variability in trait–richness relationships, both common (e.g. density) and more specific (e.g. interstitial space) traits can serve as reliable proxies for species richness when capturing facilitative processes at the relevant scale for the response community. To reconcile this diversity of traits, we classify foundation species traits into 26 standardised categories, which constitutes a valuable framework to consolidate the interoperability of future research on the effects of foundation species on biodiversity. This classification and the associated database on foundation species–biodiversity relationships set a baseline for a comprehensive assessment of how multiple foundation species shape heterogeneous seascapes, which is essential for predicting the effects of habitat alteration or restoration on coastal biodiversity.

海洋基础物种促进生物多样性:系统和定量综合确定基于特征的标准,以了解海景功能。
海洋基础物种通过其物理结构和生物活性在塑造海洋景观和支持生物多样性方面发挥着关键作用。然而,全球变化可以改变基础物种,从而引起生态系统功能和完整性的深刻变化。为了更好地了解基础物种如何影响生物多样性,我们首先对311篇文章进行了系统回顾,这些文章要么比较了与基础物种相关的生物多样性指标,要么研究了生物多样性与基础物种特征之间的关系(在个体或栖息地尺度上)。随后的荟萃分析表明,基础物种总体上平均增加了72%的物种丰富度,尽管这种效应的强度和性质因尺度和分类群而异。为了更好地理解这些变化,我们综合了与基础物种相关的性状范围,以及这些性状与各种多样性指标的关系。虽然在个体和栖息地尺度上测量了许多特征,但研究和基础物种群体之间的不一致性阻碍了对海洋基础物种之间功能权衡的正式评估。尽管性状-丰富度关系具有高度的可变性,但当在响应群落的相关尺度上捕捉促进过程时,常见性状(如密度)和更具体的性状(如间隙空间)都可以作为物种丰富度的可靠代理。为了协调这种多样性,我们将基础物种的特征分为26个标准化类别,这为巩固基础物种对生物多样性影响的未来研究的互操作性提供了一个有价值的框架。该分类和相关的基础物种-生物多样性关系数据库为综合评估多种基础物种如何塑造异质海景奠定了基础,这对于预测栖息地改变或恢复对沿海生物多样性的影响至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological Reviews
Biological Reviews 生物-生物学
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biological Reviews is a scientific journal that covers a wide range of topics in the biological sciences. It publishes several review articles per issue, which are aimed at both non-specialist biologists and researchers in the field. The articles are scholarly and include extensive bibliographies. Authors are instructed to be aware of the diverse readership and write their articles accordingly. The reviews in Biological Reviews serve as comprehensive introductions to specific fields, presenting the current state of the art and highlighting gaps in knowledge. Each article can be up to 20,000 words long and includes an abstract, a thorough introduction, and a statement of conclusions. The journal focuses on publishing synthetic reviews, which are based on existing literature and address important biological questions. These reviews are interesting to a broad readership and are timely, often related to fast-moving fields or new discoveries. A key aspect of a synthetic review is that it goes beyond simply compiling information and instead analyzes the collected data to create a new theoretical or conceptual framework that can significantly impact the field. Biological Reviews is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Abstracts on Hygiene & Communicable Diseases, Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, AgBiotechNet, AGRICOLA Database, GeoRef, Global Health, SCOPUS, Weed Abstracts, and Reaction Citation Index, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书