What Drives Conservation Adoption? Social Science Insights from Cattle Ranchers in the Pantanal Wetland, Brazil

IF 7.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Davidson Gomes Nogueira, Fabio de Olivera Roque, João Augusto Rossi Borges, Walfrido Moraes Tomas, Morena Mills, Arundhati Jagadish, André Valle Nunes, Peter Leimgruber, Charlotte Legh-Smith, Silvio Marchini, Rafael Morais Chiaravalloti
{"title":"What Drives Conservation Adoption? Social Science Insights from Cattle Ranchers in the Pantanal Wetland, Brazil","authors":"Davidson Gomes Nogueira,&nbsp;Fabio de Olivera Roque,&nbsp;João Augusto Rossi Borges,&nbsp;Walfrido Moraes Tomas,&nbsp;Morena Mills,&nbsp;Arundhati Jagadish,&nbsp;André Valle Nunes,&nbsp;Peter Leimgruber,&nbsp;Charlotte Legh-Smith,&nbsp;Silvio Marchini,&nbsp;Rafael Morais Chiaravalloti","doi":"10.1111/con4.70033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Fostering meaningful and equitable collaboration between practitioners and local stakeholders remains a major challenge in conservation science and practice. Common barriers include differences in intentions, values, priorities, and access to decision-making processes. We used a novel multidisciplinary approach combining ethnography, theory of planned behavior (TPB), and diffusion of innovation theory (DOI) to investigate the intention to adopt a sustainable ranching certification scheme in the Brazilian Pantanal at the macro (e.g., sociological and political) and micro (e.g., psychological and anthropological) levels. Between August 2021 and July 2024, we conducted participant observation, semi-structured interviews, and surveys guided by the TPB and DOI frameworks with ranchers, managers, and cowboys. Results highlight the significant role of external recognition of local culture in ranchers’ intention to adopt the sustainable ranching scheme. Mistrust of government and NGOs emerged as a barrier to adoption. By integrating micro- and macro-level factors, this research uncovered a more holistic perspective of the drivers that play a role in Pantanal ranchers’ intention to adopt dynamics—identifying possible paths for conservation practice in the region. This research also underscores the importance of multidisciplinary research to better understand how to foster and sustain local engagement.</p>","PeriodicalId":157,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Letters","volume":"19 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/con4.70033","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Letters","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/con4.70033","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fostering meaningful and equitable collaboration between practitioners and local stakeholders remains a major challenge in conservation science and practice. Common barriers include differences in intentions, values, priorities, and access to decision-making processes. We used a novel multidisciplinary approach combining ethnography, theory of planned behavior (TPB), and diffusion of innovation theory (DOI) to investigate the intention to adopt a sustainable ranching certification scheme in the Brazilian Pantanal at the macro (e.g., sociological and political) and micro (e.g., psychological and anthropological) levels. Between August 2021 and July 2024, we conducted participant observation, semi-structured interviews, and surveys guided by the TPB and DOI frameworks with ranchers, managers, and cowboys. Results highlight the significant role of external recognition of local culture in ranchers’ intention to adopt the sustainable ranching scheme. Mistrust of government and NGOs emerged as a barrier to adoption. By integrating micro- and macro-level factors, this research uncovered a more holistic perspective of the drivers that play a role in Pantanal ranchers’ intention to adopt dynamics—identifying possible paths for conservation practice in the region. This research also underscores the importance of multidisciplinary research to better understand how to foster and sustain local engagement.

Abstract Image

是什么推动了环保的采用?来自巴西潘塔纳尔湿地牧场主的社会科学见解
促进从业者和当地利益相关者之间有意义和公平的合作仍然是保护科学和实践中的主要挑战。常见的障碍包括意图、价值观、优先事项和参与决策过程的不同。我们采用了一种新的多学科方法,结合民族志、计划行为理论(TPB)和创新扩散理论(DOI),从宏观(如社会学和政治)和微观(如心理学和人类学)层面调查了巴西潘塔纳尔地区采用可持续牧场认证计划的意图。在2021年8月至2024年7月期间,我们在TPB和DOI框架的指导下,对牧场主、管理人员和牛仔进行了参与者观察、半结构化访谈和调查。结果强调了外部对当地文化的认可对牧场主采用可持续牧场计划的意向的重要作用。对政府和非政府组织的不信任成为收养的障碍。通过整合微观和宏观层面的因素,本研究揭示了一个更全面的视角,即在潘塔纳尔牧场主采取动态措施的意图中发挥作用的驱动因素——确定了该地区保护实践的可能路径。这项研究还强调了多学科研究对更好地了解如何促进和维持地方参与的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Conservation Letters
Conservation Letters BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
70
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Conservation Letters is a reputable scientific journal that is devoted to the publication of both empirical and theoretical research that has important implications for the conservation of biological diversity. The journal warmly invites submissions from various disciplines within the biological and social sciences, with a particular interest in interdisciplinary work. The primary aim is to advance both pragmatic conservation objectives and scientific knowledge. Manuscripts are subject to a rapid communication schedule, therefore they should address current and relevant topics. Research articles should effectively communicate the significance of their findings in relation to conservation policy and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书