Rethinking coping in chronic pain: a systematic review and dynamic interaction model of coping.

IF 4.3 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Pain Reports Pub Date : 2026-03-17 eCollection Date: 2026-04-01 DOI:10.1097/PR9.0000000000001421
Merethe Blandhol, Seoyoung Lee, Dan-Mikael Ellingsen
{"title":"Rethinking coping in chronic pain: a systematic review and dynamic interaction model of coping.","authors":"Merethe Blandhol, Seoyoung Lee, Dan-Mikael Ellingsen","doi":"10.1097/PR9.0000000000001421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Living with chronic pain presents significant challenges and disruptions, thus motivating the use of coping strategies to manage pain and its impact in everyday life. Yet how individuals cope with chronic pain and why some people show better functional outcomes is not clearly understood. Previous literature on coping has often focused on describing different coping strategies and their comparative effectiveness, often with the assumption that some are overall more adaptive. Existing theoretical models of coping often lack descriptions of how factors unfold over time and assume relationships between factors remain stable. However, pain coping is not only influenced by continuously changing internal and external contextual factors, but by changing interactions as the process reiterates over time. Moreover, the short- and long-term efficacy of different coping approaches depends on individual appraisal and changing contextual demands. In this review, we first synthesise selected theoretical models of coping in health-related stress or pain that were identified through a systematic search. Next, we present the \"Dynamic Interaction Model of Coping in Chronic Pain\" which builds on concepts from the stress and coping literature to address gaps in the selected models. Specifically, we outline how 5 central factors: (1) controllability, (2) predictability, (3) salience, (4) resources, and (5) motivation, interact in a dynamic coping process guided by updating predictions, feedback, and expectations. The model outlines putative pathways of moment-to-moment and long-term adaptations to chronic pain, and potential targets for intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":52189,"journal":{"name":"Pain Reports","volume":"11 2","pages":"e1421"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12999111/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000001421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Living with chronic pain presents significant challenges and disruptions, thus motivating the use of coping strategies to manage pain and its impact in everyday life. Yet how individuals cope with chronic pain and why some people show better functional outcomes is not clearly understood. Previous literature on coping has often focused on describing different coping strategies and their comparative effectiveness, often with the assumption that some are overall more adaptive. Existing theoretical models of coping often lack descriptions of how factors unfold over time and assume relationships between factors remain stable. However, pain coping is not only influenced by continuously changing internal and external contextual factors, but by changing interactions as the process reiterates over time. Moreover, the short- and long-term efficacy of different coping approaches depends on individual appraisal and changing contextual demands. In this review, we first synthesise selected theoretical models of coping in health-related stress or pain that were identified through a systematic search. Next, we present the "Dynamic Interaction Model of Coping in Chronic Pain" which builds on concepts from the stress and coping literature to address gaps in the selected models. Specifically, we outline how 5 central factors: (1) controllability, (2) predictability, (3) salience, (4) resources, and (5) motivation, interact in a dynamic coping process guided by updating predictions, feedback, and expectations. The model outlines putative pathways of moment-to-moment and long-term adaptations to chronic pain, and potential targets for intervention.

慢性疼痛应对的再思考:应对的系统回顾和动态互动模型。
慢性疼痛带来了巨大的挑战和干扰,因此激励使用应对策略来管理疼痛及其对日常生活的影响。然而,个人如何应对慢性疼痛,以及为什么有些人表现出更好的功能结果,目前还不清楚。先前关于应对的文献通常侧重于描述不同的应对策略及其相对有效性,通常假设某些策略总体上更具适应性。现有的应对理论模型往往缺乏对因素如何随时间发展的描述,并假设因素之间的关系保持稳定。然而,疼痛的应对不仅受到不断变化的内部和外部环境因素的影响,还受到随着时间的推移而不断变化的互动的影响。此外,不同应对方式的短期和长期效果取决于个体的评价和不断变化的环境需求。在这篇综述中,我们首先综合了通过系统搜索确定的与健康相关的压力或疼痛的应对理论模型。接下来,我们提出了“慢性疼痛应对的动态互动模型”,该模型建立在压力和应对文献的概念基础上,以解决所选模型的空白。具体来说,我们概述了5个核心因素:(1)可控性,(2)可预测性,(3)显著性,(4)资源,(5)动机,如何在更新预测,反馈和期望的指导下动态应对过程中相互作用。该模型概述了对慢性疼痛的即时和长期适应的假定途径,以及干预的潜在目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Reports
Pain Reports Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.10%
发文量
93
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书