Rethinking Tipping Points in Spatial Ecosystems.

IF 2.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
American Naturalist Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-11 DOI:10.1086/739177
Swarnendu Banerjee, Mara Baudena, Paul Carter, Robbin Bastiaansen, Arjen Doelman, Max Rietkerk
{"title":"Rethinking Tipping Points in Spatial Ecosystems.","authors":"Swarnendu Banerjee, Mara Baudena, Paul Carter, Robbin Bastiaansen, Arjen Doelman, Max Rietkerk","doi":"10.1086/739177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AbstractTipping point theory has garnered substantial attention over recent decades. It predicts abrupt and often irreversible transitions from one ecosystem state to an alternative state. However, ecosystem models that predict tipping typically neglect spatial dynamics. Recent studies reveal that incorporating spatial dynamics may enable ecosystems to evade tipping predicted by nonspatial models. Here, we use a dryland and a savanna-forest model to synthesize mechanisms by which spatial processes can alter the theory of tipping. We further propose that the underlying drivers of positive feedback leading to alternative stable states may provide insight into the tipping evasion mechanisms most relevant to a specific ecosystem. For instance, while positive feedbacks may arise in drylands from direct self-facilitation, such as enhancing the uptake of a limiting resource, at the savanna-forest boundary, it may arise from mutual inhibition between two ecosystem components. In the former case ecosystems can evade tipping by forming self-organized patterns, whereas in the latter the presence of environmental heterogeneity may be required. Our study highlights that deepening our understanding of how ecological feedbacks connect to tipping evasion mechanisms is crucial to formulate better strategies to increase ecosystem resilience.</p>","PeriodicalId":50800,"journal":{"name":"American Naturalist","volume":"207 4","pages":"483-502"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Naturalist","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/739177","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractTipping point theory has garnered substantial attention over recent decades. It predicts abrupt and often irreversible transitions from one ecosystem state to an alternative state. However, ecosystem models that predict tipping typically neglect spatial dynamics. Recent studies reveal that incorporating spatial dynamics may enable ecosystems to evade tipping predicted by nonspatial models. Here, we use a dryland and a savanna-forest model to synthesize mechanisms by which spatial processes can alter the theory of tipping. We further propose that the underlying drivers of positive feedback leading to alternative stable states may provide insight into the tipping evasion mechanisms most relevant to a specific ecosystem. For instance, while positive feedbacks may arise in drylands from direct self-facilitation, such as enhancing the uptake of a limiting resource, at the savanna-forest boundary, it may arise from mutual inhibition between two ecosystem components. In the former case ecosystems can evade tipping by forming self-organized patterns, whereas in the latter the presence of environmental heterogeneity may be required. Our study highlights that deepening our understanding of how ecological feedbacks connect to tipping evasion mechanisms is crucial to formulate better strategies to increase ecosystem resilience.

重新思考空间生态系统的临界点。
摘要近几十年来,引爆点理论引起了人们的广泛关注。它预测了从一种生态系统状态到另一种生态系统状态的突然且往往不可逆转的转变。然而,预测倾倒的生态系统模型通常忽略了空间动力学。最近的研究表明,结合空间动力学可以使生态系统避免非空间模型预测的倾倒。在这里,我们使用旱地和稀树草原-森林模型来综合空间过程可以改变倾倒理论的机制。我们进一步提出,正反馈导致替代稳定状态的潜在驱动因素可能为了解与特定生态系统最相关的引爆逃避机制提供洞见。例如,虽然在干旱地可能由于直接的自我促进而产生积极反馈,例如在稀树草原-森林边界上加强对有限资源的吸收,但也可能由于两个生态系统组成部分之间的相互抑制而产生积极反馈。在前一种情况下,生态系统可以通过形成自组织模式来避免倾倒,而在后一种情况下,可能需要环境异质性的存在。我们的研究强调,加深我们对生态反馈与倾倒规避机制之间的联系的理解,对于制定更好的策略来提高生态系统的恢复能力至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Naturalist
American Naturalist 环境科学-进化生物学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
194
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Since its inception in 1867, The American Naturalist has maintained its position as one of the world''s premier peer-reviewed publications in ecology, evolution, and behavior research. Its goals are to publish articles that are of broad interest to the readership, pose new and significant problems, introduce novel subjects, develop conceptual unification, and change the way people think. AmNat emphasizes sophisticated methodologies and innovative theoretical syntheses—all in an effort to advance the knowledge of organic evolution and other broad biological principles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书