{"title":"Hot-Dry Weather Is Associated with Worse Reproductive Outcomes Regardless of Group Composition in a Long-Lived Cooperatively Breeding Bird.","authors":"Kyle-Mark Middleton, Carrie Hickman, Claire N Spottiswoode, Fanny Rybak, Rita Covas","doi":"10.1086/739305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AbstractAnthropogenic climate change is driving increases in temperature and droughts. Cooperative breeding, common in regions with greater environmental variation, has been proposed to buffer against such conditions, but findings across taxa are mixed. Life history strategies may partly explain these discrepancies, as long-lived species should invest less in reproduction. We examined how climatic, social, and life history factors affect reproduction in the long-lived cooperative southern ground-hornbill (<i>Bucorvus leadbeateri</i>). Using 17 years of data from 23 groups within the Greater Kruger National Park, South Africa, we tested for associations between temperature, rainfall and group composition, and several reproductive parameters. Low winter rainfall decreased breeding probability, while higher temperatures delayed laying and reduced nestling mass, regardless of group composition. Nestlings had longer tarsi in groups with more adults, and groups with more juveniles bred earlier and were more likely to breed, likely reflecting territory quality rather than group composition. In conclusion, hot and dry conditions negatively impacted ground-hornbill breeding, and, as expected given their life history, group composition did not mitigate these effects. We suggest that life history strategies and nonreproductive benefits of collective behavior, such as resource defense and survival, should be considered when assessing cooperative breeders' responses to environmental fluctuations.</p>","PeriodicalId":50800,"journal":{"name":"American Naturalist","volume":"207 4","pages":"519-532"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Naturalist","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/739305","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
AbstractAnthropogenic climate change is driving increases in temperature and droughts. Cooperative breeding, common in regions with greater environmental variation, has been proposed to buffer against such conditions, but findings across taxa are mixed. Life history strategies may partly explain these discrepancies, as long-lived species should invest less in reproduction. We examined how climatic, social, and life history factors affect reproduction in the long-lived cooperative southern ground-hornbill (Bucorvus leadbeateri). Using 17 years of data from 23 groups within the Greater Kruger National Park, South Africa, we tested for associations between temperature, rainfall and group composition, and several reproductive parameters. Low winter rainfall decreased breeding probability, while higher temperatures delayed laying and reduced nestling mass, regardless of group composition. Nestlings had longer tarsi in groups with more adults, and groups with more juveniles bred earlier and were more likely to breed, likely reflecting territory quality rather than group composition. In conclusion, hot and dry conditions negatively impacted ground-hornbill breeding, and, as expected given their life history, group composition did not mitigate these effects. We suggest that life history strategies and nonreproductive benefits of collective behavior, such as resource defense and survival, should be considered when assessing cooperative breeders' responses to environmental fluctuations.
期刊介绍:
Since its inception in 1867, The American Naturalist has maintained its position as one of the world''s premier peer-reviewed publications in ecology, evolution, and behavior research. Its goals are to publish articles that are of broad interest to the readership, pose new and significant problems, introduce novel subjects, develop conceptual unification, and change the way people think. AmNat emphasizes sophisticated methodologies and innovative theoretical syntheses—all in an effort to advance the knowledge of organic evolution and other broad biological principles.