The Immediate Effects of Vibrotexture Shoe Insoles on Quiet Standing Balance and Lower Limb Muscle Activity in Healthy Young Adults.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Megan Trotman, Avni Hurkat, Kylie Tucker, Thomas Cattagni, Anna L Hatton
{"title":"The Immediate Effects of Vibrotexture Shoe Insoles on Quiet Standing Balance and Lower Limb Muscle Activity in Healthy Young Adults.","authors":"Megan Trotman, Avni Hurkat, Kylie Tucker, Thomas Cattagni, Anna L Hatton","doi":"10.1002/jfa2.70150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Shoe insoles that provide a single source of plantar sensory stimulus, such as texture or vibration, can improve measures of standing balance. Vibrotexture insoles, designed to provide multiple sources of sensory stimuli, may provide greater benefits. This study aimed to investigate the immediate effects of wearing Vibrotexture insoles on quiet standing balance and lower limb muscle activity in healthy young adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty healthy young adults (16 males, 23.6 ± 3.9 years) performed standing balance tests (eyes open/closed, firm/foam surface) wearing four different insoles (vibrotexture, textured, vibrating, and control) within standardized shoes. Balance outcomes included center of pressure (COP) velocity, COP anteroposterior and mediolateral (ML) path length and range. Lower limb muscle amplitude was examined using electromyography at the medial gastrocnemius, soleus, peroneus longus, rectus femoris, biceps femoris, and gluteus medius (dominant leg). Perceived insole comfort and user experience was reported. One-way Friedman tests were used to compare differences between insoles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the primary aim of interest, there were no differences in balance measures or muscle activity between the vibrotexture insoles and other insole conditions. Exploratory secondary analyses revealed that COP ML path length was less while wearing the textured compared to vibrating insoles (eyes open, firm surface) (p = 0.022), and rectus femoris muscle amplitude was less while wearing the textured compared to control insoles (eyes open, foam surface) (p = 0.027). The vibrotexture insoles were perceived as less comfortable than the control insoles (p < 0.013). Participants commonly reported the sensory-stimulating insoles to feel \"spiky\", \"tingly\", or \"rough\".</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Wearing vibrotexture insoles for the first time does not appear to alter standing balance in young adults. However, textured insoles do alter COP ML path length and rectus femoris amplitude. These findings highlight the need to investigate vibrotexture insoles in more dynamic tasks and in populations with reduced foot sensation, where their effects may be more pronounced.</p>","PeriodicalId":49164,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research","volume":"19 1","pages":"e70150"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13097555/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jfa2.70150","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Shoe insoles that provide a single source of plantar sensory stimulus, such as texture or vibration, can improve measures of standing balance. Vibrotexture insoles, designed to provide multiple sources of sensory stimuli, may provide greater benefits. This study aimed to investigate the immediate effects of wearing Vibrotexture insoles on quiet standing balance and lower limb muscle activity in healthy young adults.

Methods: Thirty healthy young adults (16 males, 23.6 ± 3.9 years) performed standing balance tests (eyes open/closed, firm/foam surface) wearing four different insoles (vibrotexture, textured, vibrating, and control) within standardized shoes. Balance outcomes included center of pressure (COP) velocity, COP anteroposterior and mediolateral (ML) path length and range. Lower limb muscle amplitude was examined using electromyography at the medial gastrocnemius, soleus, peroneus longus, rectus femoris, biceps femoris, and gluteus medius (dominant leg). Perceived insole comfort and user experience was reported. One-way Friedman tests were used to compare differences between insoles.

Results: For the primary aim of interest, there were no differences in balance measures or muscle activity between the vibrotexture insoles and other insole conditions. Exploratory secondary analyses revealed that COP ML path length was less while wearing the textured compared to vibrating insoles (eyes open, firm surface) (p = 0.022), and rectus femoris muscle amplitude was less while wearing the textured compared to control insoles (eyes open, foam surface) (p = 0.027). The vibrotexture insoles were perceived as less comfortable than the control insoles (p < 0.013). Participants commonly reported the sensory-stimulating insoles to feel "spiky", "tingly", or "rough".

Conclusion: Wearing vibrotexture insoles for the first time does not appear to alter standing balance in young adults. However, textured insoles do alter COP ML path length and rectus femoris amplitude. These findings highlight the need to investigate vibrotexture insoles in more dynamic tasks and in populations with reduced foot sensation, where their effects may be more pronounced.

振动纤维鞋垫对健康青年安静站立平衡和下肢肌肉活动的直接影响。
简介:鞋垫提供单一来源的足底感官刺激,如质地或振动,可以改善站立平衡的措施。振纹鞋垫,旨在提供多种感官刺激来源,可能提供更大的好处。本研究旨在探讨穿着Vibrotexture鞋垫对健康年轻人安静站立平衡和下肢肌肉活动的直接影响。方法:30名健康青年(男性16名,23.6±3.9岁)穿着标准鞋内四种不同的鞋垫(振纹、纹理、振动和控制)进行站立平衡测试(睁眼/闭眼、硬面/泡沫面)。平衡结果包括压力中心(COP)速度,COP前后和中外侧(ML)路径长度和范围。用肌电图检查腓肠肌内侧、比目鱼肌、腓骨长肌、股直肌、股二头肌和臀中肌(优势腿)的下肢肌肉振幅。报告了感知鞋垫舒适度和用户体验。采用单向Friedman检验比较不同鞋垫之间的差异。结果:对于感兴趣的主要目的,在振动纹理鞋垫和其他鞋垫条件之间的平衡测量或肌肉活动没有差异。探索性二次分析显示,与振动鞋垫(睁眼,坚硬表面)相比,穿着纹理鞋垫时COP ML路径长度更短(p = 0.022),而穿着纹理鞋垫时股直肌振幅小于对照鞋垫(睁眼,泡沫表面)(p = 0.027)。振动纤维鞋垫被认为比对照鞋垫更不舒适(p结论:第一次穿着振动纤维鞋垫似乎不会改变年轻人的站立平衡。然而,纹理鞋垫确实改变COP ML路径长度和股直肌振幅。这些发现强调了研究振纹鞋垫在更多动态任务和足部感觉下降人群中的必要性,在这些人群中,振纹鞋垫的效果可能更为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
10.30%
发文量
83
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, the official journal of the Australian Podiatry Association and The College of Podiatry (UK), is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of policy, organisation, delivery and clinical practice related to the assessment, diagnosis, prevention and management of foot and ankle disorders. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research covers a wide range of clinical subject areas, including diabetology, paediatrics, sports medicine, gerontology and geriatrics, foot surgery, physical therapy, dermatology, wound management, radiology, biomechanics and bioengineering, orthotics and prosthetics, as well the broad areas of epidemiology, policy, organisation and delivery of services related to foot and ankle care. The journal encourages submissions from all health professionals who manage lower limb conditions, including podiatrists, nurses, physical therapists and physiotherapists, orthopaedists, manual therapists, medical specialists and general medical practitioners, as well as health service researchers concerned with foot and ankle care. The Australian Podiatry Association and the College of Podiatry (UK) have reserve funds to cover the article-processing charge for manuscripts submitted by its members. Society members can email the appropriate contact at Australian Podiatry Association or The College of Podiatry to obtain the corresponding code to enter on submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书