The Brazilian risk assessment severity index score: a novel tool for predicting in-hospital mortality in emergency departments.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Paulo Henrique Reis Negreiros, Mariana Rebello Hilgert, Bruno Guerra, Maurício de Carvalho, Hugo Manuel Paz Morale, Gustavo Lenci Marques
{"title":"The Brazilian risk assessment severity index score: a novel tool for predicting in-hospital mortality in emergency departments.","authors":"Paulo Henrique Reis Negreiros, Mariana Rebello Hilgert, Bruno Guerra, Maurício de Carvalho, Hugo Manuel Paz Morale, Gustavo Lenci Marques","doi":"10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2026.036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>BACKGROUND:</b> Rapid identification of patients at risk of clinical deterioration (in-hospital mortality) in emergency settings is essential for timely and appropriate care. Existing prognostic scores, such as the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV (APACHE IV), Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 (SAPS 3), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), and National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS 2), have limitations in emergency scenarios, particularly in resource-limited settings. We aimed to develop a simple and efficient tool tailored to the Brazilian healthcare system. <b>METHODS:</b> This retrospective, multicenter, cohort study analyzed data from 50,709 adult patients admitted to 12 hospitals in southern and southeastern Brazil between 2019 and 2020. The BRASIL score (Brazilian Risk Assessment Severity Index and Length of stay) was constructed using demographic and clinical variables available at admission. Logistic regression was used to determine the weight of each variable, and each variable was assigned a point value based on its β-coefficient and clinical relevance, with thresholds defined according to established medical cutoffs and statistical performance. The score's predictive accuracy was validated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with comparative analysis against NEWS 2. <b>RESULTS:</b> The BRASIL score, including age, sex, respiratory rate, heart rate, oxygen saturation, blood pressure, and body temperature, was derived through variables independently associated with in-hospital mortality in a multicenter cohort. The total score was stratified into three risk categories - low (0-3 points), moderate (4-7 points), and high (>7 points) - using observed inflection points in mortality distribution to optimize discrimination. This stratification demonstrated a stepwise increase in mortality rates across categories and the discriminatory performance, with an overall AUC of 0.743 (95% <i>CI</i>: 0.726-0.761). Compared to NEWS 2 (AUC 0.697, 95% <i>CI</i>: 0.683-0.711), the BRASIL score offered superior early risk identification, supporting timely clinical decision-making and resource allocation in the emergency setting. <b>CONCLUSION:</b> The BRASIL score is a novel tool for predicting in-hospital mortality in emergency departments. Its predictive performance and ease of use suggest that it has the potential to improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23685,"journal":{"name":"World journal of emergency medicine","volume":"17 2","pages":"154-161"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12995589/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of emergency medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2026.036","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rapid identification of patients at risk of clinical deterioration (in-hospital mortality) in emergency settings is essential for timely and appropriate care. Existing prognostic scores, such as the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV (APACHE IV), Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 (SAPS 3), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), and National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS 2), have limitations in emergency scenarios, particularly in resource-limited settings. We aimed to develop a simple and efficient tool tailored to the Brazilian healthcare system. METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter, cohort study analyzed data from 50,709 adult patients admitted to 12 hospitals in southern and southeastern Brazil between 2019 and 2020. The BRASIL score (Brazilian Risk Assessment Severity Index and Length of stay) was constructed using demographic and clinical variables available at admission. Logistic regression was used to determine the weight of each variable, and each variable was assigned a point value based on its β-coefficient and clinical relevance, with thresholds defined according to established medical cutoffs and statistical performance. The score's predictive accuracy was validated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with comparative analysis against NEWS 2. RESULTS: The BRASIL score, including age, sex, respiratory rate, heart rate, oxygen saturation, blood pressure, and body temperature, was derived through variables independently associated with in-hospital mortality in a multicenter cohort. The total score was stratified into three risk categories - low (0-3 points), moderate (4-7 points), and high (>7 points) - using observed inflection points in mortality distribution to optimize discrimination. This stratification demonstrated a stepwise increase in mortality rates across categories and the discriminatory performance, with an overall AUC of 0.743 (95% CI: 0.726-0.761). Compared to NEWS 2 (AUC 0.697, 95% CI: 0.683-0.711), the BRASIL score offered superior early risk identification, supporting timely clinical decision-making and resource allocation in the emergency setting. CONCLUSION: The BRASIL score is a novel tool for predicting in-hospital mortality in emergency departments. Its predictive performance and ease of use suggest that it has the potential to improve patient outcomes.

巴西风险评估严重程度指数评分:一种预测急诊科院内死亡率的新工具。
背景:在紧急情况下,快速识别有临床恶化(院内死亡)风险的患者对于及时和适当的护理至关重要。现有的预后评分,如急性生理和慢性健康评估IV (APACHE IV)、简化急性生理评分3 (SAPS 3)、顺序器官衰竭评估(SOFA)和国家预警评分2 (NEWS 2),在紧急情况下有局限性,特别是在资源有限的情况下。我们的目标是开发一个简单而有效的工具,为巴西的医疗保健系统量身定制。方法:这项回顾性、多中心、队列研究分析了2019年至2020年期间巴西南部和东南部12家医院收治的50,709名成年患者的数据。BRASIL评分(巴西风险评估严重程度指数和住院时间)是根据入院时可用的人口统计学和临床变量构建的。采用Logistic回归确定每个变量的权重,并根据其β系数和临床相关性为每个变量分配一个点值,并根据确定的医学截止点和统计性能定义阈值。采用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)与NEWS 2进行对比分析,验证该评分的预测准确性。结果:BRASIL评分包括年龄、性别、呼吸频率、心率、血氧饱和度、血压和体温,是通过多中心队列中与院内死亡率独立相关的变量得出的。根据观察到的死亡率分布拐点,将总得分分为低(0-3分)、中(4-7分)和高(bbb7分)三个风险类别,以优化区分。该分层显示了不同类别和歧视性表现的死亡率逐步增加,总体AUC为0.743 (95% CI: 0.726-0.761)。与NEWS 2 (AUC 0.697, 95% CI: 0.683-0.711)相比,BRASIL评分提供了更好的早期风险识别,支持在紧急情况下及时的临床决策和资源分配。结论:BRASIL评分是一种预测急诊科住院死亡率的新工具。它的预测性能和易用性表明它有可能改善患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
671
期刊介绍: The journal will cover technical, clinical and bioengineering studies related to multidisciplinary specialties of emergency medicine, such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation, acute injury, out-of-hospital emergency medical service, intensive care, injury and disease prevention, disaster management, healthy policy and ethics, toxicology, and sudden illness, including cardiology, internal medicine, anesthesiology, orthopedics, and trauma care, and more. The journal also features basic science, special reports, case reports, board review questions, and more. Editorials and communications to the editor explore controversial issues and encourage further discussion by physicians dealing with emergency medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书