Hannah Julia Scheibner, Annely Morgenstern, Martin Heinze, Yuriy Ignatyev, Bernhard Michalowsky, Moritz Platen, Sebastian von Peter, Volker Dahling
{"title":"[Quality control in geriatric psychiatry: development and applicability of documented quality indicators].","authors":"Hannah Julia Scheibner, Annely Morgenstern, Martin Heinze, Yuriy Ignatyev, Bernhard Michalowsky, Moritz Platen, Sebastian von Peter, Volker Dahling","doi":"10.1055/a-2768-0066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The development and suitability testing of quality indicators for geriatric psychiatry.The indicators were developed by a group of experts and evaluated in terms of significance, scientific validity and practicability (according to QUALIFY). After a field test, qualitative interviews were conducted with the evaluators.All 24 indicators originally developed were classified as significant, 18 of them as scientific. Of these, 9 (by experts) and 8 (by evaluators) were rated as practicable. Indicators on delirium prevention, age-specific groups and liberty-depriving measures were rated as non-scientific. In terms of practicability, indicators on the documentation of therapy services were often inadequate.The developed set provides a good basis for measuring process quality in geriatric psychiatry.</p>","PeriodicalId":20711,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatrische Praxis","volume":"53 2","pages":"64-72"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatrische Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2768-0066","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The development and suitability testing of quality indicators for geriatric psychiatry.The indicators were developed by a group of experts and evaluated in terms of significance, scientific validity and practicability (according to QUALIFY). After a field test, qualitative interviews were conducted with the evaluators.All 24 indicators originally developed were classified as significant, 18 of them as scientific. Of these, 9 (by experts) and 8 (by evaluators) were rated as practicable. Indicators on delirium prevention, age-specific groups and liberty-depriving measures were rated as non-scientific. In terms of practicability, indicators on the documentation of therapy services were often inadequate.The developed set provides a good basis for measuring process quality in geriatric psychiatry.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
