Effect of preoperative intranasal insulin on postoperative delirium in adult surgical patients: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Emmanuel Mark M Velasco, Vinicius Sepúlveda Lima, Tulio Caldonazo, Felipe S Passos, Paulo Ricardo Gessolo Lins, Iago Teles Costa Grillo, Pedro Tanaka, Alex Macario, Aleksandar R Zivkovic, João da ManoelSilva, Johannes Ehler, Ricardo Esper Treml
{"title":"Effect of preoperative intranasal insulin on postoperative delirium in adult surgical patients: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis.","authors":"Emmanuel Mark M Velasco, Vinicius Sepúlveda Lima, Tulio Caldonazo, Felipe S Passos, Paulo Ricardo Gessolo Lins, Iago Teles Costa Grillo, Pedro Tanaka, Alex Macario, Aleksandar R Zivkovic, João da ManoelSilva, Johannes Ehler, Ricardo Esper Treml","doi":"10.1186/s13741-026-00674-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND: Postoperative delirium (POD) is a frequent and serious complication, especially in older adults and high-risk surgical patients. Intranasal insulin has emerged as a potential neuroprotective intervention, possibly modulating neuroinflammation and preserving cognitive function. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of preoperative intranasal insulin in reducing POD incidence. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched through March 2025 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing intranasal insulin versus placebo in adult surgical patients. The primary outcome was the incidence of POD. Secondary outcomes included inflammatory biomarkers (IL-6, TNF-α, CRP), glucose levels, and insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). Odds ratios (OR) and mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using random-effects models. Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) was also performed. RESULTS: Eight RCTs from China involving 888 patients (481 intranasal insulin, 407 placebo) were included. Intranasal insulin significantly reduced the risk of POD (OR 0.24; 95% CI 0.17 to 0.34; p < 0.001; I2 = 0%). TSA confirmed the robustness of this finding. Significant reductions in IL-6 (MD -2.52; 95% CI -3.45 to -1.58) and TNF-α (MD -5.02; 95% CI -8.67 to -1.36) were observed. No significant differences were found in serum or CSF glucose, or HOMA-IR. No hypoglycemia or serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: Preoperative intranasal insulin is a safe and effective strategy to reduce POD, likely through central anti-inflammatory mechanisms, without compromising glycemic stability. </p>","PeriodicalId":19764,"journal":{"name":"Perioperative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13063771/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perioperative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-026-00674-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postoperative delirium (POD) is a frequent and serious complication, especially in older adults and high-risk surgical patients. Intranasal insulin has emerged as a potential neuroprotective intervention, possibly modulating neuroinflammation and preserving cognitive function. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of preoperative intranasal insulin in reducing POD incidence. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched through March 2025 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing intranasal insulin versus placebo in adult surgical patients. The primary outcome was the incidence of POD. Secondary outcomes included inflammatory biomarkers (IL-6, TNF-α, CRP), glucose levels, and insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). Odds ratios (OR) and mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using random-effects models. Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) was also performed. RESULTS: Eight RCTs from China involving 888 patients (481 intranasal insulin, 407 placebo) were included. Intranasal insulin significantly reduced the risk of POD (OR 0.24; 95% CI 0.17 to 0.34; p < 0.001; I2 = 0%). TSA confirmed the robustness of this finding. Significant reductions in IL-6 (MD -2.52; 95% CI -3.45 to -1.58) and TNF-α (MD -5.02; 95% CI -8.67 to -1.36) were observed. No significant differences were found in serum or CSF glucose, or HOMA-IR. No hypoglycemia or serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: Preoperative intranasal insulin is a safe and effective strategy to reduce POD, likely through central anti-inflammatory mechanisms, without compromising glycemic stability.

术前鼻内胰岛素对成人手术患者术后谵妄的影响:系统回顾、荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。
背景:术后谵妄(POD)是一种常见且严重的并发症,尤其是在老年人和高危手术患者中。鼻内胰岛素已成为一种潜在的神经保护干预,可能调节神经炎症并保持认知功能。本研究旨在评价术前鼻内胰岛素降低POD发生率的有效性和安全性。方法:根据PRISMA指南进行系统评价和荟萃分析。PubMed, Embase和Cochrane图书馆检索了截至2025年3月的随机对照试验(rct),比较鼻内胰岛素与安慰剂在成人手术患者中的作用。主要观察指标为POD的发生率。次要结局包括炎症生物标志物(IL-6、TNF-α、CRP)、血糖水平和胰岛素抵抗(HOMA-IR)。使用随机效应模型计算95%置信区间(CI)的优势比(OR)和平均差异(MD)。同时进行试验序列分析(TSA)。结果:纳入来自中国的8项随机对照试验,涉及888例患者(481例鼻内胰岛素,407例安慰剂)。鼻内胰岛素显著降低POD的风险(OR 0.24; 95% CI 0.17 ~ 0.34; p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
3.80%
发文量
55
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书