Outcomes of laparoscopic myomectomy for large and high-order fibroids: a single-centre service evaluation.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Pub Date : 2026-12-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-19 DOI:10.1080/01443615.2026.2630227
Rebecca McMurray, Maxine Reindorf, Brooke Vandermolen, Mehrnoosh Aref-Adib, Funlayo Odejinmi
{"title":"Outcomes of laparoscopic myomectomy for large and high-order fibroids: a single-centre service evaluation.","authors":"Rebecca McMurray, Maxine Reindorf, Brooke Vandermolen, Mehrnoosh Aref-Adib, Funlayo Odejinmi","doi":"10.1080/01443615.2026.2630227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ethnic minority patients experience a higher uterine fibroid disease burden and reduced access to minimally invasive myomectomy. Restrictive selection criteria may disproportionately exclude these patients from laparoscopic surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective service-evaluation database analysed retrospectively, including all conventional (non-robotic) laparoscopic myomectomies performed between January 2004 and December 2024 at a single UK university hospital. Primary outcomes were estimated blood loss (EBL), length of hospital stay (LOS) and operating time. Secondary outcomes were blood transfusion rate, conversion to laparotomy and analysis of fibroid burden by ethnicity. Outcomes were compared between patients with large fibroids (>10 cm), high-order fibroids (>10 fibroids removed), both and neither. We performed inferential descriptive statistics using SPSS v27 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 550 patients, 164 had large fibroids, 30 high-order fibroids, 18 both and 338 neither. Ethnic minority patients represented 77%, 93%, 89% and 72% of these groups, respectively. Mean EBL was higher in large fibroid (345 mL) and combined groups (483 mL) compared with neither (211 mL), without associated increases in transfusion, conversion to laparotomy, or LOS. Black African and Black Caribbean patients had greater fibroid burden and higher blood loss than Caucasian patients, reflecting disease severity rather than ethnicity as an independent determinant of outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a specialist setting, laparoscopic myomectomy is feasible and safe for patients with large and/or multiple fibroids, including those from ethnic minority backgrounds with higher disease burden. Expansion of access within appropriately resourced centres may help reduce inequities in fibroid care.</p>","PeriodicalId":16627,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"46 1","pages":"2630227"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2026.2630227","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ethnic minority patients experience a higher uterine fibroid disease burden and reduced access to minimally invasive myomectomy. Restrictive selection criteria may disproportionately exclude these patients from laparoscopic surgery.

Methods: This was a prospective service-evaluation database analysed retrospectively, including all conventional (non-robotic) laparoscopic myomectomies performed between January 2004 and December 2024 at a single UK university hospital. Primary outcomes were estimated blood loss (EBL), length of hospital stay (LOS) and operating time. Secondary outcomes were blood transfusion rate, conversion to laparotomy and analysis of fibroid burden by ethnicity. Outcomes were compared between patients with large fibroids (>10 cm), high-order fibroids (>10 fibroids removed), both and neither. We performed inferential descriptive statistics using SPSS v27 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).

Results: Among 550 patients, 164 had large fibroids, 30 high-order fibroids, 18 both and 338 neither. Ethnic minority patients represented 77%, 93%, 89% and 72% of these groups, respectively. Mean EBL was higher in large fibroid (345 mL) and combined groups (483 mL) compared with neither (211 mL), without associated increases in transfusion, conversion to laparotomy, or LOS. Black African and Black Caribbean patients had greater fibroid burden and higher blood loss than Caucasian patients, reflecting disease severity rather than ethnicity as an independent determinant of outcome.

Conclusions: In a specialist setting, laparoscopic myomectomy is feasible and safe for patients with large and/or multiple fibroids, including those from ethnic minority backgrounds with higher disease burden. Expansion of access within appropriately resourced centres may help reduce inequities in fibroid care.

腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术治疗大、高阶肌瘤的结果:单中心服务评估。
背景:少数民族患者经历较高的子宫肌瘤疾病负担和较少的微创子宫肌瘤切除术。限制性选择标准可能不成比例地将这些患者排除在腹腔镜手术之外。方法:回顾性分析前瞻性服务评价数据库,包括2004年1月至2024年12月在一家英国大学医院进行的所有传统(非机器人)腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术。主要结局是估计失血量(EBL)、住院时间(LOS)和手术时间。次要结局是输血率、转剖腹手术和按种族分析肌瘤负担。比较大肌瘤(>10 cm)、高阶肌瘤(>10 cm切除)、两者均切除和两者均不切除的患者的结果。我们使用SPSS v27 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL)进行推理描述性统计。结果:550例患者中,大肌瘤164例,小肌瘤30例,大肌瘤18例,小肌瘤338例。少数民族患者分别占77%、93%、89%和72%。大肌瘤组(345 mL)和联合组(483 mL)的平均EBL高于两组(211 mL),没有相关的输血、转剖腹手术或LOS增加。非洲黑人和加勒比黑人患者比白种人患者有更大的肌瘤负担和更高的失血量,反映了疾病的严重程度,而不是种族作为结果的独立决定因素。结论:在专科环境下,腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术对于大和/或多发性肌瘤患者是可行和安全的,包括那些来自疾病负担较高的少数民族背景的患者。扩大在适当资源中心的访问可能有助于减少肌瘤护理的不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
398
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology represents an established forum for the entire field of obstetrics and gynaecology, publishing a broad range of original, peer-reviewed papers, from scientific and clinical research to reviews relevant to practice. It also includes occasional supplements on clinical symposia. The journal is read widely by trainees in our specialty and we acknowledge a major role in education in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Past and present editors have recognized the difficulties that junior doctors encounter in achieving their first publications and spend time advising authors during their initial attempts at submission. The journal continues to attract a world-wide readership thanks to the emphasis on practical applicability and its excellent record of drawing on an international base of authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书