[Assessing the risk-benefit balance of medicines: Some lessons from Covid-19].

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
M S-medecine Sciences Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-20 DOI:10.1051/medsci/2026040
Jean-Luc Cracowski, Mathieu Molimard, Vincent Richard, Matthieu Roustit, Charles Khouri
{"title":"[Assessing the risk-benefit balance of medicines: Some lessons from Covid-19].","authors":"Jean-Luc Cracowski, Mathieu Molimard, Vincent Richard, Matthieu Roustit, Charles Khouri","doi":"10.1051/medsci/2026040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The efficacy of medications is evaluated by clinical trials. However, such trials are not designed to assess adverse effects, particularly when those are rare. A robust pharmacovigilance system is therefore required to assess risks, supplemented as requested by pharmacoepidemiology studies. The benefits of medications are expressed in either relative or absolute terms and they vary depending on the baseline risk of the disease (its severity, potential complications, progression, and its incidence for the population-level benefits). This is not the case for adverse effects, which are influenced by the drug characteristics and the population receiving the treatment. In this context, can we truly balance the benefits and risks of medications? The experience of Covid-19 illustrates the complexity of this concept. It clearly highlights the need for a comprehensive approach, integrating analysis of clinical trials, pharmacovigilance monitoring, pharmacoepidemiology studies, and the detection of potential drug interactions. Finally, it is essential to inform and educate the general public about medications. This empowers individuals to accurately understand the complex concept of benefit-risk balance, prevents misleading over simplifications, and helps effectively counter misinformation.</p>","PeriodicalId":18205,"journal":{"name":"M S-medecine Sciences","volume":"42 3","pages":"295-305"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"M S-medecine Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/2026040","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The efficacy of medications is evaluated by clinical trials. However, such trials are not designed to assess adverse effects, particularly when those are rare. A robust pharmacovigilance system is therefore required to assess risks, supplemented as requested by pharmacoepidemiology studies. The benefits of medications are expressed in either relative or absolute terms and they vary depending on the baseline risk of the disease (its severity, potential complications, progression, and its incidence for the population-level benefits). This is not the case for adverse effects, which are influenced by the drug characteristics and the population receiving the treatment. In this context, can we truly balance the benefits and risks of medications? The experience of Covid-19 illustrates the complexity of this concept. It clearly highlights the need for a comprehensive approach, integrating analysis of clinical trials, pharmacovigilance monitoring, pharmacoepidemiology studies, and the detection of potential drug interactions. Finally, it is essential to inform and educate the general public about medications. This empowers individuals to accurately understand the complex concept of benefit-risk balance, prevents misleading over simplifications, and helps effectively counter misinformation.

[评估药物的风险-收益平衡:从Covid-19吸取的一些教训]。
药物的疗效通过临床试验来评价。然而,这样的试验并不是为了评估副作用而设计的,特别是当这些副作用很少见的时候。因此,需要一个强有力的药物警戒系统来评估风险,并根据药物流行病学研究的要求加以补充。药物治疗的益处以相对或绝对的方式表达,并且根据疾病的基线风险(严重程度、潜在并发症、进展和人群水平获益的发生率)而变化。这与不良反应不同,不良反应受药物特性和接受治疗的人群的影响。在这种情况下,我们能真正平衡药物的益处和风险吗?2019冠状病毒病的经验说明了这一概念的复杂性。它清楚地强调了需要一种综合方法,将临床试验分析、药物警戒监测、药物流行病学研究和潜在药物相互作用的检测结合起来。最后,必须告知和教育公众有关药物的知识。这使个人能够准确地理解利益风险平衡的复杂概念,防止因简化而产生误导,并有助于有效地反击错误信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
M S-medecine Sciences
M S-medecine Sciences 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
182
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: m/s offers high-quality review articles in French, covering all areas of biomedical and health research, in a monthly magazine format (10 issues / year). m/s is read by the whole French-speaking community, in France but also in Belgium, Switzerland, Canada, Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia etc. m/s is not a primary publication, and thus will not consider unpublished data. Most articles are invited by the Editors, but spontaneous proposals are welcomed. Each issue combines news and views on the most recent scientific publications, as well as broadly accessible and updated review articles on a specific topic, and essays on science and society, history of science, public health, or reactions to published articles. Each year, m/s also publishes one or two thematic issues focused on a research topic of high interest. All review articles and essays are peer-reviewed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书