Sport- and sex-specific differences in rapid weight loss practices among elite combat sport athletes.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES
Ki-Jun Park
{"title":"Sport- and sex-specific differences in rapid weight loss practices among elite combat sport athletes.","authors":"Ki-Jun Park","doi":"10.23736/S0022-4707.26.17620-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rapid weight loss (RWL) is widely practiced in combat sports, yet comparative data across sports and sexes are limited. This study aimed to compare RWL patterns, methods, and associated physical and psychological difficulties by sport and sex among elite Korean combat sports athletes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional analysis was conducted in 414 elite athletes from taekwondo, judo, wrestling, and boxing. Body mass was recorded before RWL, at the official weigh-in, and prior to competition. RWL practices, sources of information, and physical and psychological difficulties were assessed using validated questionnaires. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) were performed separately for male and female athletes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Athletes engaged in RWL for an average of 6.53 days, losing 5.49% of body mass and regaining approximately 95% before competition. RWL duration did not differ by sport or sex. However, significant sport-specific differences were observed in absolute and relative weight loss and weight regain, with judo and wrestling athletes showing greater weight loss and wrestlers exhibiting the highest regain. No significant differences were found among sports in RWL methods, sources of information, or reported physical and psychological difficulties. Athletes predominantly relied on coaches and peers and commonly reported fatigue, dizziness, irritability, and impaired concentration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While RWL duration is similar across sports and sexes, the magnitude of weight loss and regain varies according to sport-specific regulations. Despite these differences, RWL methods and associated difficulties are consistent, emphasizing the need for evidence-based weight management and greater involvement of health professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":17013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness","volume":" ","pages":"838-846"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.26.17620-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Rapid weight loss (RWL) is widely practiced in combat sports, yet comparative data across sports and sexes are limited. This study aimed to compare RWL patterns, methods, and associated physical and psychological difficulties by sport and sex among elite Korean combat sports athletes.

Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted in 414 elite athletes from taekwondo, judo, wrestling, and boxing. Body mass was recorded before RWL, at the official weigh-in, and prior to competition. RWL practices, sources of information, and physical and psychological difficulties were assessed using validated questionnaires. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) were performed separately for male and female athletes.

Results: Athletes engaged in RWL for an average of 6.53 days, losing 5.49% of body mass and regaining approximately 95% before competition. RWL duration did not differ by sport or sex. However, significant sport-specific differences were observed in absolute and relative weight loss and weight regain, with judo and wrestling athletes showing greater weight loss and wrestlers exhibiting the highest regain. No significant differences were found among sports in RWL methods, sources of information, or reported physical and psychological difficulties. Athletes predominantly relied on coaches and peers and commonly reported fatigue, dizziness, irritability, and impaired concentration.

Conclusions: While RWL duration is similar across sports and sexes, the magnitude of weight loss and regain varies according to sport-specific regulations. Despite these differences, RWL methods and associated difficulties are consistent, emphasizing the need for evidence-based weight management and greater involvement of health professionals.

优秀格斗运动员快速减肥练习的运动和性别差异。
背景:快速减肥(RWL)在格斗运动中被广泛应用,但跨运动和性别的比较数据有限。本研究旨在比较韩国优秀格斗运动员的RWL模式、方法以及与运动和性别相关的生理和心理困难。方法:对414名跆拳道、柔道、摔跤、拳击优秀运动员进行横断面分析。在RWL之前,在官方称重时和比赛之前记录了体重。RWL实践、信息来源和生理和心理困难使用有效的问卷进行评估。对男女运动员分别进行单因素方差分析(ANOVA)和多因素方差分析(MANOVA)。结果:运动员进行RWL的平均时间为6.53天,赛前体重下降5.49%,恢复约95%。RWL持续时间没有因运动或性别而异。然而,在绝对和相对体重减轻和体重恢复方面,观察到明显的运动特异性差异,柔道和摔跤运动员表现出更大的体重减轻,摔跤运动员表现出最高的体重恢复。在RWL方法、信息来源或报告的身体和心理困难方面,运动之间没有发现显著差异。运动员主要依靠教练和同伴,通常报告疲劳、头晕、易怒和注意力不集中。结论:虽然RWL持续时间在运动和性别之间相似,但体重减轻和恢复的幅度根据运动特定规则而变化。尽管存在这些差异,RWL方法和相关困难是一致的,强调需要以证据为基础的体重管理和卫生专业人员的更多参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
393
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness publishes scientific papers relating to the area of the applied physiology, preventive medicine, sports medicine and traumatology, sports psychology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书