Machine learning-based models using preoperative imaging and clinical data to predict intraoperative rebleeding and functional recovery in intracerebral hemorrhage patients: a multicenter study.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of neurosurgical sciences Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-20 DOI:10.23736/S0390-5616.25.06664-0
Xinggang Xiang, Zhen Ma, Lin Lin, Chun Fang, Rui Zhang, Jingliang Gu, Ziyi Zhai, Ting Hui
{"title":"Machine learning-based models using preoperative imaging and clinical data to predict intraoperative rebleeding and functional recovery in intracerebral hemorrhage patients: a multicenter study.","authors":"Xinggang Xiang, Zhen Ma, Lin Lin, Chun Fang, Rui Zhang, Jingliang Gu, Ziyi Zhai, Ting Hui","doi":"10.23736/S0390-5616.25.06664-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is associated with high mortality and disability. This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning models based on preoperative multimodal data to predict the risk of intraoperative rebleeding (IOR) and postoperative functional recovery in ICH patients, thereby providing support for precision treatment decisions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter prospective cohort study included 498 primary ICH patients who underwent surgical treatment at three tertiary hospitals in China between January 2018 and December 2023. Preoperative clinical characteristics, laboratory tests, and imaging parameters were collected. The primary endpoint was IOR (defined as obvious arterial bleeding requiring additional hemostatic measures during surgery, or residual/new hematoma increased by ≥5 mL on CT within 24 hours after surgery compared to preoperative assessment). The secondary endpoint was good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] ≤2) at 6 months postoperatively. Machine learning algorithms were used to construct prediction models, which were evaluated through temporal validation and external multicenter validation cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the included patients, the incidence of IOR was 14.7% (73/498), and the rate of good outcome at 6 months was 42.6% (212/498). After rigorous cross-validation and hyperparameter optimization, the deep neural network model performed best in predicting IOR (AUC 0.892, 95%CI: 0.851-0.933), with accuracy of 83.7%, sensitivity of 84.6%, and specificity of 83.5%. The XGBoost model was optimal for predicting functional recovery (AUC 0.875, 95%CI: 0.831-0.919), with accuracy of 81.9%, sensitivity of 82.1%, and specificity of 81.8%. In the external validation cohort (N.=156), the two models achieved AUCs of 0.842 (95%CI: 0.768-0.916) and 0.831 (95%CI: 0.758-0.904), respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that hematoma volume (OR=1.35, 95%CI: 1.21-1.51, per 10 mL increase), admission INR (OR=3.17, 95%CI: 2.04-4.93, >1.4 vs. ≤1.4), midline shift (OR=1.28, 95%CI: 1.13-1.44, per 1 mm increase), and preoperative platelet count (OR=0.83, 95%CI: 0.76-0.91, per decrease of 20×10<sup>9</sup>/L) were independent risk factors for IOR. Decision curve analysis demonstrated that machine learning models provided higher net clinical benefit than traditional ICH and FUNC scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Machine learning prediction models validated across multiple centers can accurately assess the risk of IOR and postoperative functional recovery in ICH patients, thereby guiding individualized treatment decisions and potentially improving patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgical sciences","volume":" ","pages":"196-215"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0390-5616.25.06664-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is associated with high mortality and disability. This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning models based on preoperative multimodal data to predict the risk of intraoperative rebleeding (IOR) and postoperative functional recovery in ICH patients, thereby providing support for precision treatment decisions.

Methods: This multicenter prospective cohort study included 498 primary ICH patients who underwent surgical treatment at three tertiary hospitals in China between January 2018 and December 2023. Preoperative clinical characteristics, laboratory tests, and imaging parameters were collected. The primary endpoint was IOR (defined as obvious arterial bleeding requiring additional hemostatic measures during surgery, or residual/new hematoma increased by ≥5 mL on CT within 24 hours after surgery compared to preoperative assessment). The secondary endpoint was good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] ≤2) at 6 months postoperatively. Machine learning algorithms were used to construct prediction models, which were evaluated through temporal validation and external multicenter validation cohorts.

Results: Among the included patients, the incidence of IOR was 14.7% (73/498), and the rate of good outcome at 6 months was 42.6% (212/498). After rigorous cross-validation and hyperparameter optimization, the deep neural network model performed best in predicting IOR (AUC 0.892, 95%CI: 0.851-0.933), with accuracy of 83.7%, sensitivity of 84.6%, and specificity of 83.5%. The XGBoost model was optimal for predicting functional recovery (AUC 0.875, 95%CI: 0.831-0.919), with accuracy of 81.9%, sensitivity of 82.1%, and specificity of 81.8%. In the external validation cohort (N.=156), the two models achieved AUCs of 0.842 (95%CI: 0.768-0.916) and 0.831 (95%CI: 0.758-0.904), respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that hematoma volume (OR=1.35, 95%CI: 1.21-1.51, per 10 mL increase), admission INR (OR=3.17, 95%CI: 2.04-4.93, >1.4 vs. ≤1.4), midline shift (OR=1.28, 95%CI: 1.13-1.44, per 1 mm increase), and preoperative platelet count (OR=0.83, 95%CI: 0.76-0.91, per decrease of 20×109/L) were independent risk factors for IOR. Decision curve analysis demonstrated that machine learning models provided higher net clinical benefit than traditional ICH and FUNC scores.

Conclusions: Machine learning prediction models validated across multiple centers can accurately assess the risk of IOR and postoperative functional recovery in ICH patients, thereby guiding individualized treatment decisions and potentially improving patient outcomes.

利用术前影像学和临床数据预测脑出血患者术中再出血和功能恢复的基于机器学习的模型:一项多中心研究
背景:自发性脑出血(ICH)与高死亡率和致残率相关。本研究旨在开发和验证基于术前多模态数据的机器学习模型,以预测脑出血患者术中再出血(IOR)风险和术后功能恢复,从而为精确的治疗决策提供支持。方法:本多中心前瞻性队列研究纳入了2018年1月至2023年12月在中国三家三级医院接受手术治疗的498例原发性脑出血患者。收集术前临床特征、实验室检查和影像学参数。主要终点是IOR(定义为明显的动脉出血,需要在手术期间采取额外的止血措施,或术后24小时内CT显示残留/新血肿比术前评估增加≥5ml)。次要终点为术后6个月良好的功能预后(改良Rankin量表[mRS]≤2)。使用机器学习算法构建预测模型,并通过时间验证和外部多中心验证队列对预测模型进行评估。结果:纳入的患者中,IOR发生率为14.7%(73/498),6个月预后良好率为42.6%(212/498)。经过严格的交叉验证和超参数优化,深度神经网络模型预测IOR的准确度为83.7%,灵敏度为84.6%,特异性为83.5%,AUC为0.892,95%CI为0.851 ~ 0.933。XGBoost模型预测功能恢复最佳(AUC为0.875,95%CI为0.831-0.919),准确率为81.9%,灵敏度为82.1%,特异性为81.8%。在外部验证队列(n =156)中,两种模型的auc分别为0.842 (95%CI: 0.768-0.916)和0.831 (95%CI: 0.758-0.904)。多因素分析显示,血肿体积(OR=1.35, 95%CI: 1.21-1.51,每增加10ml)、入院INR (OR=3.17, 95%CI: 2.04-4.93, >1.4 vs.≤1.4)、中线移位(OR=1.28, 95%CI: 1.13-1.44,每增加1mm)和术前血小板计数(OR=0.83, 95%CI: 0.76-0.91,每减少20×109/L)是IOR的独立危险因素。决策曲线分析表明,机器学习模型提供了比传统ICH和FUNC评分更高的净临床效益。结论:多中心验证的机器学习预测模型可以准确评估脑出血患者IOR和术后功能恢复的风险,从而指导个性化的治疗决策,并可能改善患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgical sciences
Journal of neurosurgical sciences CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
202
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences publishes scientific papers on neurosurgery and related subjects (electroencephalography, neurophysiology, neurochemistry, neuropathology, stereotaxy, neuroanatomy, neuroradiology, etc.). Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of ditorials, original articles, review articles, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书