Health-related quality of life in immunocompromised adults with mild-moderate COVID-19 treated with nirmatrelvir-ritonavir: results from the randomized, double-blinded EPIC-IC trial.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ruth Mokgokong, Paul Cislo, Elena Tudone, Edward Weinstein, Joseph C Cappelleri
{"title":"Health-related quality of life in immunocompromised adults with mild-moderate COVID-19 treated with nirmatrelvir-ritonavir: results from the randomized, double-blinded EPIC-IC trial.","authors":"Ruth Mokgokong, Paul Cislo, Elena Tudone, Edward Weinstein, Joseph C Cappelleri","doi":"10.1186/s12955-026-02518-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND: Little is known about health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in immunocompromised people during and after COVID-19 illness. We describe HRQoL outcomes from the EPIC-IC trial, which included participants with immunocompromise and mild–moderate COVID-19. METHODS: EPIC-IC was a randomized, double-blind trial. Participants were assigned 1:1:1 to 5-day, 10-day, or 15-day nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (NMV/r) and completed the SF-36 and EQ-5D-5L through Week (W)24. HRQoL was analyzed across and by treatment arms for the evaluable population (N = 150) and in post hoc subpopulations with severe (n = 57) and non-severe (n = 93) immunocompromise. Mixed-effects longitudinal models compared 5-day vs. 10-day or 15-day NMV/r. RESULTS: In the overall sample, mean baseline SF-36 domain scores (norm-based; mean = 50, SD = 10) ranged from 35.7 to 44.1, mean Physical Component Summary (PCS) score was 37.9, and mean Mental Component Summary (MCS) score was 41.5 – all substantially worse than cancer comparator norms and age-matched general population (AMGP) norms. Baseline mean EQ-5D-5L Index score was 0.65; participants reported problems with pain/discomfort (90% of participants), usual activities (73%), mobility (50%), anxiety/depression (48%), and self-care (29%). These proportions improved through Day (D)15 (change from baseline [CFB]: − 49%-points for pain/discomfort, − 38%-points usual activities, − 22%-points mobility, − 24%-points anxiety/depression, − 19%-points self-care) and then stabilized. From the earliest post-baseline assessment (EQ-5D-5L: D5, SF-36: D10), all overall-sample outcomes improved significantly (-5D-5p < 0.05), with all mean improvements exceeding published minimum important difference thresholds (SF-36: 2–4-point; EQ-5D-5L Index: 0.03–0.05-point). Mean EQ-5D-5L Index score surpassed AMGP norms from D5 and peaked at D15 (0.21-point CFB). Mean SF-36 outcomes improved through W12; PCS surpassed AMGP norms at W12, while MCS approached but remained below AMGP norms. Improvements were sustained through W24 (W24 CFB: PCS, 10-point; MCS, 8-point; EQ-5D-5L Index, 0.20-point). EQ-5D-5L improvements appeared similar across immunocompromised subpopulations, whereas SF-36 improvements appeared slower and smaller in severely vs. non-severely immunocompromised participants. No significant treatment-arm differences were observed, except lower D10 PCS scores among severely immunocompromised participants treated with 5-day vs. 10-day NMV/r (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Immunocompromised individuals with mild–moderate COVID-19 experienced various HRQoL decrements, followed by rapid improvements during treatment that were sustained through W24. Interpretation is limited by the absence of an untreated control group. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial number: NCT05438602. Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov. Registration date: June 28, 2022. URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05438602 . </p>","PeriodicalId":12980,"journal":{"name":"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13123141/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-026-02518-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is known about health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in immunocompromised people during and after COVID-19 illness. We describe HRQoL outcomes from the EPIC-IC trial, which included participants with immunocompromise and mild–moderate COVID-19. METHODS: EPIC-IC was a randomized, double-blind trial. Participants were assigned 1:1:1 to 5-day, 10-day, or 15-day nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (NMV/r) and completed the SF-36 and EQ-5D-5L through Week (W)24. HRQoL was analyzed across and by treatment arms for the evaluable population (N = 150) and in post hoc subpopulations with severe (n = 57) and non-severe (n = 93) immunocompromise. Mixed-effects longitudinal models compared 5-day vs. 10-day or 15-day NMV/r. RESULTS: In the overall sample, mean baseline SF-36 domain scores (norm-based; mean = 50, SD = 10) ranged from 35.7 to 44.1, mean Physical Component Summary (PCS) score was 37.9, and mean Mental Component Summary (MCS) score was 41.5 – all substantially worse than cancer comparator norms and age-matched general population (AMGP) norms. Baseline mean EQ-5D-5L Index score was 0.65; participants reported problems with pain/discomfort (90% of participants), usual activities (73%), mobility (50%), anxiety/depression (48%), and self-care (29%). These proportions improved through Day (D)15 (change from baseline [CFB]: − 49%-points for pain/discomfort, − 38%-points usual activities, − 22%-points mobility, − 24%-points anxiety/depression, − 19%-points self-care) and then stabilized. From the earliest post-baseline assessment (EQ-5D-5L: D5, SF-36: D10), all overall-sample outcomes improved significantly (-5D-5p < 0.05), with all mean improvements exceeding published minimum important difference thresholds (SF-36: 2–4-point; EQ-5D-5L Index: 0.03–0.05-point). Mean EQ-5D-5L Index score surpassed AMGP norms from D5 and peaked at D15 (0.21-point CFB). Mean SF-36 outcomes improved through W12; PCS surpassed AMGP norms at W12, while MCS approached but remained below AMGP norms. Improvements were sustained through W24 (W24 CFB: PCS, 10-point; MCS, 8-point; EQ-5D-5L Index, 0.20-point). EQ-5D-5L improvements appeared similar across immunocompromised subpopulations, whereas SF-36 improvements appeared slower and smaller in severely vs. non-severely immunocompromised participants. No significant treatment-arm differences were observed, except lower D10 PCS scores among severely immunocompromised participants treated with 5-day vs. 10-day NMV/r (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Immunocompromised individuals with mild–moderate COVID-19 experienced various HRQoL decrements, followed by rapid improvements during treatment that were sustained through W24. Interpretation is limited by the absence of an untreated control group. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial number: NCT05438602. Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov. Registration date: June 28, 2022. URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05438602 .

尼马特利韦-利托那韦治疗的轻中度COVID-19免疫功能低下成人患者的健康相关生活质量:随机双盲EPIC-IC试验结果
背景:在COVID-19疾病期间和之后,免疫功能低下人群的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)知之甚少。我们描述了EPIC-IC试验的HRQoL结果,该试验包括免疫功能低下和轻中度COVID-19患者。方法:EPIC-IC是一项随机、双盲试验。参与者按1:1:1的比例分配至5天、10天或15天的nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (NMV/r),并在第24周完成SF-36和EQ-5D-5L。对可评估人群(N = 150)和严重(N = 57)和非严重(N = 93)免疫功能低下的事后亚群进行HRQoL分析。混合效应纵向模型比较5天、10天或15天NMV/r。结果:在整个样本中,平均基线SF-36域评分(基于规范,平均值= 50,SD = 10)范围为35.7至44.1,平均身体成分总结(PCS)评分为37.9,平均精神成分总结(MCS)评分为41.5 -均明显低于癌症比较者标准和年龄匹配的一般人群(AMGP)标准。基线平均EQ-5D-5L指数评分为0.65;参与者报告了疼痛/不适(90%的参与者)、日常活动(73%)、活动能力(50%)、焦虑/抑郁(48%)和自我保健(29%)等问题。这些比例在第15天有所改善(从基线变化[CFB]:疼痛/不适- 49%分,日常活动- 38%分,活动能力- 22%分,焦虑/抑郁- 24%分,自我护理- 19%分),然后趋于稳定。从最早的基线后评估(EQ-5D-5L: D5, SF-36: D10)开始,所有总体样本结果均显著改善(-5D-5p)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.80%
发文量
154
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes is an open access, peer-reviewed, journal offering high quality articles, rapid publication and wide diffusion in the public domain. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes considers original manuscripts on the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) assessment for evaluation of medical and psychosocial interventions. It also considers approaches and studies on psychometric properties of HRQOL and patient reported outcome measures, including cultural validation of instruments if they provide information about the impact of interventions. The journal publishes study protocols and reviews summarising the present state of knowledge concerning a particular aspect of HRQOL and patient reported outcome measures. Reviews should generally follow systematic review methodology. Comments on articles and letters to the editor are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书