Conditional Dependencies Between Response Time and Item Discrimination: An Item-Level Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q2 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Joshua B Gilbert, William S Young, Zachary Himmelsbach, Esther Ulitzsch, Benjamin W Domingue
{"title":"Conditional Dependencies Between Response Time and Item Discrimination: An Item-Level Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Joshua B Gilbert, William S Young, Zachary Himmelsbach, Esther Ulitzsch, Benjamin W Domingue","doi":"10.1177/00131644261426972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of process data, such as response time (RT) in psychometrics, has generally focused on the relationship between speed and accuracy. The potential relationships between RT and item discrimination remain less explored. In this study, we propose a model for simultaneously estimating the relationships between RT and item discrimination at the person, item, and person-by-item (residual) levels and illustrate our approach through an item-level meta-analysis of 40 empirical data sets comprising 1.84 million item responses. We find no evidence of average differences in item discrimination between items of different time intensity or persons of different average RT, while residual RT strongly and negatively predicts item discrimination (pooled coef. = -.27% per 1% difference in RT, <i>SE</i> = .04, <math><mrow><mi>τ</mi></mrow> </math> = .17). While heterogeneity is high, we find little evidence of moderation by overall data set characteristics. Flexible generalized additive models show that the relationship between residual RT and item discrimination is generally curvilinear, with discrimination maximized just below average RT and minimized at the extremes. Our results suggest that RT data can provide insights into the measurement properties of educational and psychological assessments, but that the relationships between RT and item discrimination are highly variable.</p>","PeriodicalId":11502,"journal":{"name":"Educational and Psychological Measurement","volume":" ","pages":"00131644261426972"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12995739/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational and Psychological Measurement","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00131644261426972","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of process data, such as response time (RT) in psychometrics, has generally focused on the relationship between speed and accuracy. The potential relationships between RT and item discrimination remain less explored. In this study, we propose a model for simultaneously estimating the relationships between RT and item discrimination at the person, item, and person-by-item (residual) levels and illustrate our approach through an item-level meta-analysis of 40 empirical data sets comprising 1.84 million item responses. We find no evidence of average differences in item discrimination between items of different time intensity or persons of different average RT, while residual RT strongly and negatively predicts item discrimination (pooled coef. = -.27% per 1% difference in RT, SE = .04, τ = .17). While heterogeneity is high, we find little evidence of moderation by overall data set characteristics. Flexible generalized additive models show that the relationship between residual RT and item discrimination is generally curvilinear, with discrimination maximized just below average RT and minimized at the extremes. Our results suggest that RT data can provide insights into the measurement properties of educational and psychological assessments, but that the relationships between RT and item discrimination are highly variable.

反应时间与项目辨别力的条件依赖关系:一个项目水平的元分析。
过程数据的使用,如心理测量学中的反应时间(RT),通常集中在速度和准确性之间的关系上。RT和项目歧视之间的潜在关系仍然很少被探索。在这项研究中,我们提出了一个模型来同时估计RT和项目歧视在人、项目和人对项目(残差)水平之间的关系,并通过包含184万个项目回答的40个经验数据集的项目水平荟萃分析来说明我们的方法。我们发现不同时间强度的项目或不同平均RT的人在项目歧视上没有平均差异的证据,而残差RT对项目歧视有显著的负向预测(汇总系数)。= - 0.27% / 1%的RT差异,SE = 0.04, τ = 0.17)。虽然异质性很高,但我们发现总体数据集特征的适度证据很少。灵活的广义加性模型表明,残差RT与项目识别率之间的关系一般呈曲线关系,识别率在低于平均RT时最大,在极端情况下最小。我们的研究结果表明,RT数据可以深入了解教育和心理评估的测量特性,但RT与项目歧视之间的关系是高度可变的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educational and Psychological Measurement
Educational and Psychological Measurement 医学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
49
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Educational and Psychological Measurement (EPM) publishes referred scholarly work from all academic disciplines interested in the study of measurement theory, problems, and issues. Theoretical articles address new developments and techniques, and applied articles deal with innovation applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书