The Frame of Survival for Sepsis: A Practical Systems Framework for Time-Sensitive Critical Illness in Low-Resource Settings.

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Critical Care Medicine Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-20 DOI:10.1097/CCM.0000000000007093
Jorge L Hidalgo, Samuel O Akech, Subhash P Acharya, Craig M Coopersmith, Shevin T Jacob, Cintia Johnston, Niranjan Kissoon, Flávia R Machado, Ryan C Maves, Elizabeth Molyneux, Brenda M Morrow, Sheila N Myatra, M Susana Pérez Cornejo, Javier Perez-Fernandez, Chairat Permpikul, Kunchit Piyavechviratana, Andrew Rhodes, Teresa B Kortz, Vishakha K Kumar, Mpoki M Ulisubisya, Vinay Nadkarni
{"title":"The Frame of Survival for Sepsis: A Practical Systems Framework for Time-Sensitive Critical Illness in Low-Resource Settings.","authors":"Jorge L Hidalgo, Samuel O Akech, Subhash P Acharya, Craig M Coopersmith, Shevin T Jacob, Cintia Johnston, Niranjan Kissoon, Flávia R Machado, Ryan C Maves, Elizabeth Molyneux, Brenda M Morrow, Sheila N Myatra, M Susana Pérez Cornejo, Javier Perez-Fernandez, Chairat Permpikul, Kunchit Piyavechviratana, Andrew Rhodes, Teresa B Kortz, Vishakha K Kumar, Mpoki M Ulisubisya, Vinay Nadkarni","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000007093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Sepsis is a time-sensitive cause of preventable death worldwide, with disproportionate mortality in low-resource settings (LRS). Many recommendations in international sepsis guidance presume resources unavailable in many facilities and communities. We sought to develop a practical framework that helps health systems embed feasible sepsis actions within broader emergency and essential critical care systems, while highlighting where evidence is limited and where local learning systems are needed.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A targeted scoping review of peer-reviewed and grey literature on sepsis epidemiology, emergency care systems, essential emergency and critical care, implementation strategies, and quality improvement (QI) in LRS; and key guideline and policy documents relevant to sepsis and emergency care.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>We prioritized publications and guidance relevant to LRS, including observational studies, pragmatic implementation reports, consensus statements, and policies addressing emergency care organization, workforce, supply chains, diagnostics, and QI.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Task force members abstracted actionable strategies, implementation barriers/enablers, and feasibility considerations across the care continuum (community, transport/prehospital, facility-based acute care, and referral). We also identified domains where guideline certainty is low or indirect for LRS.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>A Society of Critical Care Medicine-convened multidisciplinary task force iteratively developed the \"Sepsis Frame of Survival\" using a structured process that included 1) scoping evidence review, 2) a Delphi-style prioritization of candidate framework elements by importance and feasibility, and 3) a structured consensus meeting (\"Utstein-style\" conference format) to finalize the model and its priority actions. We produced a concise implementation roadmap and a feasible measurement set aligned with resource constraints.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Sepsis Frame of Survival is a pragmatic model to organize sepsis improvement as part of emergency and essential critical care strengthening. It emphasizes high-impact actions that can be implemented with limited resources (triage and early recognition, timely antimicrobials, oxygen and basic supportive care, cautious fluid resuscitation with reassessment, source control and referral, diagnostics/microbiology where feasible, and QI). The framework explicitly distinguishes near-term, feasible changes from longer-term system investments and highlights the need for locally generated evidence to guide quality indicators and resuscitation strategies in LRS.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1202-1208"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000007093","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Sepsis is a time-sensitive cause of preventable death worldwide, with disproportionate mortality in low-resource settings (LRS). Many recommendations in international sepsis guidance presume resources unavailable in many facilities and communities. We sought to develop a practical framework that helps health systems embed feasible sepsis actions within broader emergency and essential critical care systems, while highlighting where evidence is limited and where local learning systems are needed.

Data sources: A targeted scoping review of peer-reviewed and grey literature on sepsis epidemiology, emergency care systems, essential emergency and critical care, implementation strategies, and quality improvement (QI) in LRS; and key guideline and policy documents relevant to sepsis and emergency care.

Study selection: We prioritized publications and guidance relevant to LRS, including observational studies, pragmatic implementation reports, consensus statements, and policies addressing emergency care organization, workforce, supply chains, diagnostics, and QI.

Data extraction: Task force members abstracted actionable strategies, implementation barriers/enablers, and feasibility considerations across the care continuum (community, transport/prehospital, facility-based acute care, and referral). We also identified domains where guideline certainty is low or indirect for LRS.

Data synthesis: A Society of Critical Care Medicine-convened multidisciplinary task force iteratively developed the "Sepsis Frame of Survival" using a structured process that included 1) scoping evidence review, 2) a Delphi-style prioritization of candidate framework elements by importance and feasibility, and 3) a structured consensus meeting ("Utstein-style" conference format) to finalize the model and its priority actions. We produced a concise implementation roadmap and a feasible measurement set aligned with resource constraints.

Conclusions: The Sepsis Frame of Survival is a pragmatic model to organize sepsis improvement as part of emergency and essential critical care strengthening. It emphasizes high-impact actions that can be implemented with limited resources (triage and early recognition, timely antimicrobials, oxygen and basic supportive care, cautious fluid resuscitation with reassessment, source control and referral, diagnostics/microbiology where feasible, and QI). The framework explicitly distinguishes near-term, feasible changes from longer-term system investments and highlights the need for locally generated evidence to guide quality indicators and resuscitation strategies in LRS.

脓毒症的生存框架:低资源环境下对时间敏感的危重疾病的实用系统框架。
目的:脓毒症是世界范围内可预防死亡的时间敏感原因,在低资源环境(LRS)中死亡率不成比例。国际败血症指南中的许多建议假定许多设施和社区无法获得资源。我们试图开发一个实用的框架,帮助卫生系统将可行的败血症行动纳入更广泛的急诊和基本重症监护系统,同时强调证据有限的地方和需要当地学习系统的地方。数据来源:对同行评议的脓毒症流行病学、急诊护理系统、基本急诊和重症护理、实施策略和LRS质量改进(QI)的灰色文献进行了有针对性的范围审查;以及与败血症和急诊护理相关的关键指南和政策文件。研究选择:我们优先考虑了与LRS相关的出版物和指南,包括观察性研究、务实的实施报告、共识声明以及涉及急诊护理组织、劳动力、供应链、诊断和QI的政策。数据提取:工作队成员在整个护理连续体(社区、运输/院前、基于设施的急性护理和转诊)中抽象出可操作的战略、实施障碍/促成因素和可行性考虑因素。我们还确定了LRS指南确定性较低或间接的领域。数据综合:一个由重症医学学会召集的多学科工作组使用一个结构化的过程迭代地开发了“脓毒症生存框架”,该过程包括:1)范围证据审查,2)根据重要性和可行性对候选框架要素进行德尔菲式的优先排序,以及3)结构化的共识会议(“乌斯坦式”会议格式),以最终确定模型及其优先行动。我们生成了一个简明的实现路线图和一个与资源约束一致的可行的度量集。结论:脓毒症生存框架是一个实用的模型,将脓毒症的改善作为急诊和关键重症监护加强的一部分。它强调在资源有限的情况下可以实施的高影响力行动(分诊和早期识别、及时使用抗菌素、供氧和基本支持性护理、谨慎的液体复苏和重新评估、源头控制和转诊、可行的诊断/微生物学以及质量评价)。该框架明确区分了近期可行的变化与长期系统投资,并强调需要当地产生的证据来指导LRS的质量指标和复苏战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Care Medicine
Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
728
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient. Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书