Unsatisfactory ThinPrep Pap Tests: An Educational Approach to Quality.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Diagnostic Cytopathology Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-20 DOI:10.1002/dc.70115
Kelly Olson, Erek Kucher, Ashley Rasmussen, Suzanne M Selvaggi
{"title":"Unsatisfactory ThinPrep Pap Tests: An Educational Approach to Quality.","authors":"Kelly Olson, Erek Kucher, Ashley Rasmussen, Suzanne M Selvaggi","doi":"10.1002/dc.70115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The unsatisfactory percentage for ThinPrep Pap Tests (TPPT) at our institution reached the 75th percentile (2.7%) benchmark established by the College of American Pathologists (CAP). Our aim was to identify outliers by analysis of data, provide education and feedback, and establish a system to monitor outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The laboratory information system (LIS) was queried for TPPT cases diagnosed as 'Non-diagnostic' between April and June 2022. Two hundred and thirty-two cases were identified and reviewed by 2 cytopathologists and 1 cytotechnologist to identify limiting factors, including cellularity, blood, lubricant, inflammation, and mucus. The percentage of unsatisfactory TPPT was evaluated for both clinicians and clinics and stratified into peer groups based on total TPPT collected. The two clinics with the highest unsatisfactory percentage in a peer group of > 500 TPPT collected were identified. A LIS report was created to improve efficiency in future data collection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Low cellularity was a limiting factor in 100% of cases, blood in 51.7% (n = 120), lubricant in 18.5% (n = 43), inflammation in 13.8% (n = 32), and mucus in 3.9% (n = 9), with multiple factors possible per case. Twenty clinics collected > 500 TPPT for FY2022. Two clinics (1 resident-led clinic) had an unsatisfactory percentage > 3%, for which to target interventions. Clinic 1 had an unsatisfactory percentage of 6.1% (62/1018), and clinic 2 was 3.5% (21/608).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To address limiting factors, a laboratory bulletin with best practices for TPPT collection and a list of Hologic TPPT approved lubricants was sent to each clinic. Statistics of unsatisfactory TPPT were provided. The highest unsatisfactory TPPT clinics received Hologic educational materials and an educational session. The resolution of laboratory quality issues requires investigations, often laborious in nature. In an era of staffing shortages, an effective LIS is essential to efficiently investigate and resolve quality variances. TPPT data via LIS reports were reviewed at 3 months and 1-year post-intervention implementation to evaluate outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11349,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic Cytopathology","volume":" ","pages":"444-448"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic Cytopathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.70115","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The unsatisfactory percentage for ThinPrep Pap Tests (TPPT) at our institution reached the 75th percentile (2.7%) benchmark established by the College of American Pathologists (CAP). Our aim was to identify outliers by analysis of data, provide education and feedback, and establish a system to monitor outcomes.

Methods: The laboratory information system (LIS) was queried for TPPT cases diagnosed as 'Non-diagnostic' between April and June 2022. Two hundred and thirty-two cases were identified and reviewed by 2 cytopathologists and 1 cytotechnologist to identify limiting factors, including cellularity, blood, lubricant, inflammation, and mucus. The percentage of unsatisfactory TPPT was evaluated for both clinicians and clinics and stratified into peer groups based on total TPPT collected. The two clinics with the highest unsatisfactory percentage in a peer group of > 500 TPPT collected were identified. A LIS report was created to improve efficiency in future data collection.

Results: Low cellularity was a limiting factor in 100% of cases, blood in 51.7% (n = 120), lubricant in 18.5% (n = 43), inflammation in 13.8% (n = 32), and mucus in 3.9% (n = 9), with multiple factors possible per case. Twenty clinics collected > 500 TPPT for FY2022. Two clinics (1 resident-led clinic) had an unsatisfactory percentage > 3%, for which to target interventions. Clinic 1 had an unsatisfactory percentage of 6.1% (62/1018), and clinic 2 was 3.5% (21/608).

Conclusions: To address limiting factors, a laboratory bulletin with best practices for TPPT collection and a list of Hologic TPPT approved lubricants was sent to each clinic. Statistics of unsatisfactory TPPT were provided. The highest unsatisfactory TPPT clinics received Hologic educational materials and an educational session. The resolution of laboratory quality issues requires investigations, often laborious in nature. In an era of staffing shortages, an effective LIS is essential to efficiently investigate and resolve quality variances. TPPT data via LIS reports were reviewed at 3 months and 1-year post-intervention implementation to evaluate outcomes.

令人不满意的薄准备巴氏涂片:一种教育方法的质量。
背景:我院薄型巴氏试验(TPPT)不满意率达到美国病理学家学会(CAP)制定的第75百分位(2.7%)基准。我们的目的是通过分析数据来识别异常值,提供教育和反馈,并建立一个系统来监测结果。方法:对2022年4 - 6月诊断为“非诊断”的TPPT病例进行实验室信息系统(LIS)查询。2名细胞病理学家和1名细胞技术专家对232例病例进行了鉴定和审查,以确定限制因素,包括细胞,血液,润滑剂,炎症和粘液。评估临床医生和诊所不满意的TPPT百分比,并根据收集的TPPT总数分层到同行组。确定了两家诊所在收集的bbbb500 TPPT的同行组中不满意百分比最高。创建LIS报告是为了提高未来数据收集的效率。结果:100%病例的限制因素为低细胞性,51.7% (n = 120)为血液限制因素,18.5% (n = 43)为润滑剂限制因素,13.8% (n = 32)为炎症限制因素,3.9% (n = 9)为粘液限制因素。20家诊所为2022财年收集了500亿美元的TPPT。两家诊所(1家由居民领导的诊所)的不满意百分比为0.3%,需要针对这些诊所进行干预。临床1不满意率为6.1%(62/1018),临床2不满意率为3.5%(21/608)。结论:为了解决限制因素,向每个诊所发送了一份包含TPPT收集最佳实践的实验室公告和Hologic TPPT批准的润滑剂清单。提供不满意TPPT的统计数据。最不满意的TPPT诊所获得了Hologic教材和一次教育会议。实验室质量问题的解决需要调查,通常是费力的。在人员短缺的时代,有效的LIS对于有效地调查和解决质量差异至关重要。通过LIS报告的TPPT数据在干预实施后3个月和1年进行审查,以评估结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diagnostic Cytopathology
Diagnostic Cytopathology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Diagnostic Cytopathology is intended to provide a forum for the exchange of information in the field of cytopathology, with special emphasis on the practical, clinical aspects of the discipline. The editors invite original scientific articles, as well as special review articles, feature articles, and letters to the editor, from laboratory professionals engaged in the practice of cytopathology. Manuscripts are accepted for publication on the basis of scientific merit, practical significance, and suitability for publication in a journal dedicated to this discipline. Original articles can be considered only with the understanding that they have never been published before and that they have not been submitted for simultaneous review to another publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书