Virtual Multidisciplinary GI Care Clinic Improves Patient Engagement, Satisfaction, and Outcomes at Reduced Costs and Healthcare Utilization: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Sameer K Berry,Sanskriti Varma,Chamara Basnayake,Joseph C Ahn,Jeffrey Berinstein,David Cook,Walter Chan,John Allen,William Chey
{"title":"Virtual Multidisciplinary GI Care Clinic Improves Patient Engagement, Satisfaction, and Outcomes at Reduced Costs and Healthcare Utilization: A Prospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Sameer K Berry,Sanskriti Varma,Chamara Basnayake,Joseph C Ahn,Jeffrey Berinstein,David Cook,Walter Chan,John Allen,William Chey","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000004002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\r\nChronic gastrointestinal (GI) conditions, including irritable bowel syndrome and other disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBIs), are prevalent and costly, and fragmented care contributes to suboptimal outcomes. Virtual and multidisciplinary care models may improve outcomes.\r\n\r\nOBJECTIVES\r\nWe aimed to 1) characterize patients receiving virtual GI care, 2) report patient engagement with and patient-reported outcomes after virtual multidisciplinary care, 3) report healthcare utilization and costs from a payer perspective among patients versus propensity score-matched controls identified from claims data.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe collected descriptive data on patient demographics, clinic provider visits, symptoms, and patient-reported outcomes from 3/2021-9/2022. To evaluate healthcare utilization and costs, we conducted difference-in-difference (DID) analyses using claims data compared with a propensity score-matched control group.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nAmong 234 patients (71% female, mean age 45.4±13.2 years), 51% received a new GI diagnosis, predominately DGBI (63%). Engagement criteria were met by 80% (n=187), who completed a mean of 10 visits and median time-to-first appointment of 6 days. Dietitians (93%), psychologists (76%), and health coaches (64%) were frequently utilized. Engaged patients exhibited significant improvements from pre- to post-clinic in IBS severity (226.7 to 145.6), symptom control (20.2% to 86.6%), quality-of-life dysphoria (27.5 to 32.8), missed workdays (1.0 to 0.7), and satisfaction (37.4% to 96.3%) (all p<0.05). Compared with matched controls, a significantly smaller percent of patients had imaging (15% vs. 44%; p < 0.0001) and GI-related emergency department visits (4% vs. 10%; p =.0028), which contributed to reductions in GI-related costs ($443 PMPM; p=0.047) and all-cause costs ($676 PMPM; p=0.043), equating to annualized savings of $5,316 and $8,112, respectively.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nVirtual multidisciplinary GI care was associated with high engagement, improved clinical outcomes, and reduced healthcare utilization and costs.","PeriodicalId":520099,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":"419 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000004002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Chronic gastrointestinal (GI) conditions, including irritable bowel syndrome and other disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBIs), are prevalent and costly, and fragmented care contributes to suboptimal outcomes. Virtual and multidisciplinary care models may improve outcomes. OBJECTIVES We aimed to 1) characterize patients receiving virtual GI care, 2) report patient engagement with and patient-reported outcomes after virtual multidisciplinary care, 3) report healthcare utilization and costs from a payer perspective among patients versus propensity score-matched controls identified from claims data. METHODS We collected descriptive data on patient demographics, clinic provider visits, symptoms, and patient-reported outcomes from 3/2021-9/2022. To evaluate healthcare utilization and costs, we conducted difference-in-difference (DID) analyses using claims data compared with a propensity score-matched control group. RESULTS Among 234 patients (71% female, mean age 45.4±13.2 years), 51% received a new GI diagnosis, predominately DGBI (63%). Engagement criteria were met by 80% (n=187), who completed a mean of 10 visits and median time-to-first appointment of 6 days. Dietitians (93%), psychologists (76%), and health coaches (64%) were frequently utilized. Engaged patients exhibited significant improvements from pre- to post-clinic in IBS severity (226.7 to 145.6), symptom control (20.2% to 86.6%), quality-of-life dysphoria (27.5 to 32.8), missed workdays (1.0 to 0.7), and satisfaction (37.4% to 96.3%) (all p<0.05). Compared with matched controls, a significantly smaller percent of patients had imaging (15% vs. 44%; p < 0.0001) and GI-related emergency department visits (4% vs. 10%; p =.0028), which contributed to reductions in GI-related costs ($443 PMPM; p=0.047) and all-cause costs ($676 PMPM; p=0.043), equating to annualized savings of $5,316 and $8,112, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Virtual multidisciplinary GI care was associated with high engagement, improved clinical outcomes, and reduced healthcare utilization and costs.
虚拟多学科胃肠道护理诊所在降低成本和医疗保健利用的情况下提高患者参与度、满意度和结果:一项前瞻性队列研究。
慢性胃肠道(GI)疾病,包括肠易激综合征和其他肠-脑相互作用疾病(DGBIs),是普遍且昂贵的,碎片化的护理导致了次优结果。虚拟和多学科的护理模式可以改善结果。目的:我们的目的是1)描述接受虚拟胃肠道护理的患者特征,2)报告患者参与和患者报告的虚拟多学科护理后的结果,3)从付款人的角度报告患者的医疗保健利用和成本,以及从索赔数据中确定的倾向评分匹配对照。方法:我们收集了2021年3月至2022年9月期间患者人口统计学、诊所就诊、症状和患者报告结局的描述性数据。为了评估医疗保健利用和成本,我们使用索赔数据与倾向评分匹配的对照组进行了差异中差异(DID)分析。结果234例患者中(71%为女性,平均年龄45.4±13.2岁),51%接受了新的胃肠道诊断,以DGBI为主(63%)。80% (n=187)达到了参与标准,他们平均完成了10次就诊,到第一次预约的中位时间为6天。经常使用营养师(93%)、心理学家(76%)和健康教练(64%)。参与治疗的患者在IBS严重程度(226.7 - 145.6)、症状控制(20.2% - 86.6%)、生活质量焦虑(27.5 - 32.8)、缺勤天数(1.0 - 0.7)和满意度(37.4% - 96.3%)方面均有显著改善(均p<0.05)。与对照组相比,接受影像学检查的患者比例(15%对44%,p < 0.0001)和gi相关急诊科就诊的患者比例(4%对10%,p= 0.0028)明显减少,这有助于gi相关费用(443美元PMPM, p=0.047)和全因费用(676美元PMPM, p=0.043)的减少,相当于每年分别节省5316美元和8112美元。结论虚拟多学科胃肠道护理与高参与度、改善临床结果、降低医疗保健利用率和成本相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书