Exploring the socioeconomic and education-based inequalities in modern and traditional contraceptive use among women in Africa.

IF 2.5 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Amidu Alhassan, Patience Fakornam Doe, Frank Offei Odonkor, Yvonne Dorothy Mintah, Christiana Bobuafor, Asirifi Isaac Gunu, Joseph Lasong, Yula Salifu
{"title":"Exploring the socioeconomic and education-based inequalities in modern and traditional contraceptive use among women in Africa.","authors":"Amidu Alhassan, Patience Fakornam Doe, Frank Offei Odonkor, Yvonne Dorothy Mintah, Christiana Bobuafor, Asirifi Isaac Gunu, Joseph Lasong, Yula Salifu","doi":"10.1186/s40834-026-00443-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND: Contraceptive use is integral to improving reproductive health outcomes, but disparities in access and use persist across Africa, influenced by socio-economic, educational, and age-related factors. This study explores socioeconomic and education-based inequalities in modern and traditional contraceptive use among women in 41 African countries. METHODS: Secondary data from the World Health Organisation’s Health Equity Assessment Toolkits and national demographic surveys (2010–2022) were analysed. The study focused on women aged 15–49, categorised by socio-economic status, education level, and age. Descriptive and inferential statistical methods were used, employing inequality measures such as D (Estimate), R (Estimate), PAF (Estimate), and PAR (Estimate) to assess disparities in contraceptive use. RESULTS: The study found significant variation in contraceptive prevalence, ranging from high-prevalence nations such as Zimbabwe (66.8%), Malawi (65.6%), and Lesotho (64.9%). South Sudan (4%) and Chad (8.2%) had very low prevalence rates. Age-related disparities were also significant, with contraceptive use generally higher in the 20–49 years age group compared to the 15–19 years age group. Again, Ghana exhibited 17% use among 15–19-year-olds compared to 53% in the 20–49-year-old group. The D revealed substantial inequalities in contraceptive use, particularly in countries like Kenya (22.5) and Malawi (20.6). The R highlighted greater disparities in countries such as Nigeria (4.0), indicating a significant socio-economic divide. The PAF demonstrated that socio-economic inequalities contributed to disparities, with Mozambique (5.8) and Niger (8.1) showing higher contributions. PAR further revealed that countries like Malawi (1.6) and Gambia (1.0) had a higher burden of inequality in contraceptive use. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates persistent and intersecting age-, wealth-, and education-related inequalities in contraceptive use across Africa. By applying standardised inequality metrics in a cross-country comparative framework, the findings extend beyond prevalence-based analyses and provide actionable evidence to inform equity-oriented family planning policies and programmes. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable. </p>","PeriodicalId":93956,"journal":{"name":"Contraception and reproductive medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13112778/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception and reproductive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40834-026-00443-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Contraceptive use is integral to improving reproductive health outcomes, but disparities in access and use persist across Africa, influenced by socio-economic, educational, and age-related factors. This study explores socioeconomic and education-based inequalities in modern and traditional contraceptive use among women in 41 African countries. METHODS: Secondary data from the World Health Organisation’s Health Equity Assessment Toolkits and national demographic surveys (2010–2022) were analysed. The study focused on women aged 15–49, categorised by socio-economic status, education level, and age. Descriptive and inferential statistical methods were used, employing inequality measures such as D (Estimate), R (Estimate), PAF (Estimate), and PAR (Estimate) to assess disparities in contraceptive use. RESULTS: The study found significant variation in contraceptive prevalence, ranging from high-prevalence nations such as Zimbabwe (66.8%), Malawi (65.6%), and Lesotho (64.9%). South Sudan (4%) and Chad (8.2%) had very low prevalence rates. Age-related disparities were also significant, with contraceptive use generally higher in the 20–49 years age group compared to the 15–19 years age group. Again, Ghana exhibited 17% use among 15–19-year-olds compared to 53% in the 20–49-year-old group. The D revealed substantial inequalities in contraceptive use, particularly in countries like Kenya (22.5) and Malawi (20.6). The R highlighted greater disparities in countries such as Nigeria (4.0), indicating a significant socio-economic divide. The PAF demonstrated that socio-economic inequalities contributed to disparities, with Mozambique (5.8) and Niger (8.1) showing higher contributions. PAR further revealed that countries like Malawi (1.6) and Gambia (1.0) had a higher burden of inequality in contraceptive use. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates persistent and intersecting age-, wealth-, and education-related inequalities in contraceptive use across Africa. By applying standardised inequality metrics in a cross-country comparative framework, the findings extend beyond prevalence-based analyses and provide actionable evidence to inform equity-oriented family planning policies and programmes. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

探讨非洲妇女在现代和传统避孕药具使用方面的社会经济和教育不平等现象。
背景:避孕药具的使用是改善生殖健康结果不可或缺的一部分,但受社会经济、教育和年龄相关因素的影响,非洲各地在获取和使用避孕药具方面仍然存在差异。本研究探讨了41个非洲国家妇女在现代和传统避孕方法使用方面的社会经济和教育不平等。方法:分析来自世界卫生组织卫生公平评估工具包和国家人口调查(2010-2022)的二手数据。这项研究的重点是15-49岁的女性,她们按社会经济地位、教育水平和年龄进行了分类。采用描述性和推断性统计方法,采用D(估计)、R(估计)、PAF(估计)和PAR(估计)等不平等度量来评估避孕措施使用的差异。结果:研究发现,在避孕普及率较高的国家,如津巴布韦(66.8%)、马拉维(65.6%)和莱索托(64.9%),避孕普及率存在显著差异。南苏丹(4%)和乍得(8.2%)的患病率非常低。与年龄相关的差异也很显著,与15-19岁年龄组相比,20-49岁年龄组的避孕药具使用率普遍较高。同样,加纳15 - 19岁人群的使用率为17%,而20 - 49岁人群的使用率为53%。D报告揭示了避孕药具使用方面的严重不平等,特别是在肯尼亚(22.5)和马拉维(20.6)等国家。在尼日利亚(4.0)等国家,R突出了更大的差距,表明存在显著的社会经济鸿沟。PAF表明,社会经济不平等造成了差距,莫桑比克(5.8)和尼日尔(8.1)的贡献更高。PAR进一步显示,马拉维(1.6)和冈比亚(1.0)等国家在避孕药具使用不平等方面的负担较高。结论:本研究表明,非洲各地在避孕药具使用方面存在着与年龄、财富和教育相关的持续不平等现象。通过在跨国比较框架中应用标准化的不平等指标,研究结果超越了基于流行率的分析,并提供了可操作的证据,为面向公平的计划生育政策和方案提供信息。临床试验编号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书