Variations of the ellipsoid method in estimating three-dimensional echocardiographic left atrial volume in dogs with myxomatous mitral valve disease: comparison with left atrial-to-aortic root ratios and planar volumetric methods.

IF 1.3 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
B A Terhaar, C E Pelzek, S Siess, P F J Jennings, R Pariaut, W Hsue
{"title":"Variations of the ellipsoid method in estimating three-dimensional echocardiographic left atrial volume in dogs with myxomatous mitral valve disease: comparison with left atrial-to-aortic root ratios and planar volumetric methods.","authors":"B A Terhaar, C E Pelzek, S Siess, P F J Jennings, R Pariaut, W Hsue","doi":"10.1016/j.jvc.2026.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction/objectives: </strong>The ellipsoid method estimates left atrial (LA) volume using only linear diameters and may offer a practical volumetric alternative to the left atrial-to-aortic root ratio (LA/Ao). The aim of this study was to compare variations of the ellipsoid model with LA/Ao and planar volumetric methods, using real-time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT3D) as the reference standard.</p><p><strong>Animals, materials, and methods: </strong>Seventy dogs with myxomatous mitral valve disease (43 stage B1, 17 stage B2, and 10 stages C/D) were prospectively imaged; 32 (17 stage B1, 10 stage B2, and five stages C/D) were re-imaged by another sonographer. In addition to long-axis and short-axis LA/Ao, body weight-indexed maximal LA volumes obtained using the spherical (right parasternal and left apical), monoplane ellipsoid (right parasternal and left apical), biplane ellipsoid, monoplane area-length and Simpson's method of discs (right parasternal and left apical), biplane area-length method and Simpson's method of discs, and real-time triplane methods were compared to those of RT3D.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The LA/Ao methods showed the lowest correlation (Spearman's coefficient [r<sub>s</sub>] < 0.800). Based on concordance correlation coefficients (r<sub>c</sub>), the monoplane ellipsoid (right parasternal: r<sub>c</sub> = 0.901, left apical: r<sub>c</sub> = 0.924), biplane ellipsoid (r<sub>c</sub> = 0.947), biplane area-length (r<sub>c</sub> = 0.921), biplane Simpson's method of discs (r<sub>c</sub> = 0.947), and real-time triplane (r<sub>c</sub> = 0.972) volumetric methods demonstrated at least moderate agreement. However, only the left apical monoplane ellipsoid method exhibited no systematic bias (median of the differences [95% confidence interval]: 0.00 [-0.10 to 0.07]).</p><p><strong>Study limitations: </strong>Reproducibility was assessed against a novice observer or measurer who was not involved in image acquisition.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The left apical monoplane ellipsoid method provides an effective linear option for estimating RT3D-derived maximum LA volume.</p>","PeriodicalId":48788,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Veterinary Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Veterinary Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvc.2026.02.002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction/objectives: The ellipsoid method estimates left atrial (LA) volume using only linear diameters and may offer a practical volumetric alternative to the left atrial-to-aortic root ratio (LA/Ao). The aim of this study was to compare variations of the ellipsoid model with LA/Ao and planar volumetric methods, using real-time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT3D) as the reference standard.

Animals, materials, and methods: Seventy dogs with myxomatous mitral valve disease (43 stage B1, 17 stage B2, and 10 stages C/D) were prospectively imaged; 32 (17 stage B1, 10 stage B2, and five stages C/D) were re-imaged by another sonographer. In addition to long-axis and short-axis LA/Ao, body weight-indexed maximal LA volumes obtained using the spherical (right parasternal and left apical), monoplane ellipsoid (right parasternal and left apical), biplane ellipsoid, monoplane area-length and Simpson's method of discs (right parasternal and left apical), biplane area-length method and Simpson's method of discs, and real-time triplane methods were compared to those of RT3D.

Results: The LA/Ao methods showed the lowest correlation (Spearman's coefficient [rs] < 0.800). Based on concordance correlation coefficients (rc), the monoplane ellipsoid (right parasternal: rc = 0.901, left apical: rc = 0.924), biplane ellipsoid (rc = 0.947), biplane area-length (rc = 0.921), biplane Simpson's method of discs (rc = 0.947), and real-time triplane (rc = 0.972) volumetric methods demonstrated at least moderate agreement. However, only the left apical monoplane ellipsoid method exhibited no systematic bias (median of the differences [95% confidence interval]: 0.00 [-0.10 to 0.07]).

Study limitations: Reproducibility was assessed against a novice observer or measurer who was not involved in image acquisition.

Conclusion: The left apical monoplane ellipsoid method provides an effective linear option for estimating RT3D-derived maximum LA volume.

椭球法估计二尖瓣黏液瘤病犬左心房三维超声心动图容积的变化:与左心房-主动脉根比和平面容积法的比较
简介/目的:椭球法仅使用线性直径估算左心房(LA)容积,并可能提供一种实用的容积替代左心房与主动脉根比(LA/Ao)。本研究以实时三维超声心动图(RT3D)为参考标准,比较LA/Ao和平面容积法对椭球模型的影响。动物、材料和方法:对二尖瓣黏液瘤病犬70只(B1期43只,B2期17只,C/D期10只)进行前瞻性影像学检查;32例(17例B1期,10例B2期,5例C/D期)由另一位超声医师重新成像。除了长轴和短轴LA/Ao外,还将采用球型(右胸骨旁和左根尖)、单面椭球体(右胸骨旁和左根尖)、双面椭球体、单面面积-长度法和Simpson法(右胸骨旁和左根尖)、双面面积-长度法和Simpson法以及实时三面法获得的以体重为指标的最大LA体积与RT3D进行比较。结果:LA/Ao方法相关性最低(Spearman系数[rs] < 0.800)。基于一致性相关系数(rc),单面椭球体(右胸骨旁:rc = 0.901,左根尖:rc = 0.924)、双面椭球体(rc = 0.947)、双面面积-长度(rc = 0.921)、双面Simpson椎间盘法(rc = 0.947)和实时三面体积法(rc = 0.972)表现出中等程度的一致性。然而,只有左根尖单面椭球法没有出现系统偏差(差异中位数[95%置信区间]:0.00[-0.10至0.07])。研究局限性:对未参与图像采集的新手观察者或测量者进行了再现性评估。结论:左根尖单面椭球体法为估计rt3d导出的最大LA容积提供了有效的线性选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Veterinary Cardiology
Journal of Veterinary Cardiology VETERINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
25.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
154 days
期刊介绍: The mission of the Journal of Veterinary Cardiology is to publish peer-reviewed reports of the highest quality that promote greater understanding of cardiovascular disease, and enhance the health and well being of animals and humans. The Journal of Veterinary Cardiology publishes original contributions involving research and clinical practice that include prospective and retrospective studies, clinical trials, epidemiology, observational studies, and advances in applied and basic research. The Journal invites submission of original manuscripts. Specific content areas of interest include heart failure, arrhythmias, congenital heart disease, cardiovascular medicine, surgery, hypertension, health outcomes research, diagnostic imaging, interventional techniques, genetics, molecular cardiology, and cardiovascular pathology, pharmacology, and toxicology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书