Assessment tools for peripheral neuropathy in multiple myeloma.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Sung-Soo Park, Kunye Kwak, Seol-Hee Baek, Changgon Kim, Yoon Seok Choi, Yong Park, Byung Soo Kim, Jin Seok Kim, Chang-Ki Min, Ka-Won Kang
{"title":"Assessment tools for peripheral neuropathy in multiple myeloma.","authors":"Sung-Soo Park, Kunye Kwak, Seol-Hee Baek, Changgon Kim, Yoon Seok Choi, Yong Park, Byung Soo Kim, Jin Seok Kim, Chang-Ki Min, Ka-Won Kang","doi":"10.3904/kjim.2025.281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Advances in treating multiple myeloma (MM) have improved survival, shifting the management focus toward quality of life. Peripheral neuropathy (PN) is a common treatment-related toxicity that significantly impairs quality of life. However, standardized assessment methods for PN in patients with MM are currently lacking. A comprehensive search of multiple databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed) was conducted to identify relevant records. Eligible studies were reviewed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Twenty-two studies were included, and 17 PN assessment tools were identified. Nerve conduction studies and the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events were the most commonly used clinician-based tools, whereas the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity was the most frequently used patient-reported outcome measure. The use of these tools varies depending on whether their purpose is diagnostic or evaluative. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic review to evaluate PN assessment tools for patients with MM, revealing substantial heterogeneity across studies. By organizing these diverse approaches, our findings can guide researchers and clinicians toward a more consistent and standardized PN evaluation, ultimately improving the management of treatment-related neuropathy in MM.</p>","PeriodicalId":48785,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Internal Medicine","volume":"41 2","pages":"230-241"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12999264/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2025.281","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Advances in treating multiple myeloma (MM) have improved survival, shifting the management focus toward quality of life. Peripheral neuropathy (PN) is a common treatment-related toxicity that significantly impairs quality of life. However, standardized assessment methods for PN in patients with MM are currently lacking. A comprehensive search of multiple databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed) was conducted to identify relevant records. Eligible studies were reviewed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Twenty-two studies were included, and 17 PN assessment tools were identified. Nerve conduction studies and the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events were the most commonly used clinician-based tools, whereas the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity was the most frequently used patient-reported outcome measure. The use of these tools varies depending on whether their purpose is diagnostic or evaluative. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic review to evaluate PN assessment tools for patients with MM, revealing substantial heterogeneity across studies. By organizing these diverse approaches, our findings can guide researchers and clinicians toward a more consistent and standardized PN evaluation, ultimately improving the management of treatment-related neuropathy in MM.

多发性骨髓瘤周围神经病变的评估工具。
治疗多发性骨髓瘤(MM)的进展提高了生存率,将管理重点转向生活质量。周围神经病变(PN)是一种常见的治疗相关毒性,显著损害生活质量。然而,目前缺乏MM患者PN的标准化评估方法。对多个数据库(PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library和KoreaMed)进行全面检索,以确定相关记录。符合条件的研究按照系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目进行审查。纳入了22项研究,并确定了17种PN评估工具。神经传导研究和国家癌症研究所不良事件通用术语标准是最常用的临床工具,而癌症治疗/妇科肿瘤组功能评估-神经毒性是最常用的患者报告的结果测量。这些工具的使用取决于它们的目的是诊断还是评估。据我们所知,这是第一个评估MM患者PN评估工具的系统综述,揭示了研究之间的实质性异质性。通过组织这些不同的方法,我们的发现可以指导研究人员和临床医生进行更一致和标准化的PN评估,最终改善MM治疗相关神经病变的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Internal Medicine
Korean Journal of Internal Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
129
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine is an international medical journal published in English by the Korean Association of Internal Medicine. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, reviews, and editorials on all aspects of medicine, including clinical investigations and basic research. Both human and experimental animal studies are welcome, as are new findings on the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases. Case reports will be published only in exceptional circumstances, when they illustrate a rare occurrence of clinical importance. Letters to the editor are encouraged for specific comments on published articles and general viewpoints.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书