Strengths in caregivers of children with pediatric feeding disorder: a scoping review.

IF 2.4 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Taylor P Harris, Lauren M Zaeske, Annie L Ryder, Barbara A Kerr, Dana M Bakula
{"title":"Strengths in caregivers of children with pediatric feeding disorder: a scoping review.","authors":"Taylor P Harris, Lauren M Zaeske, Annie L Ryder, Barbara A Kerr, Dana M Bakula","doi":"10.1093/jpepsy/jsag013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This scoping review investigates the character strengths of caregivers of children with pediatric feeding disorder (PFD), which impacts 1 in 37 children under 5 years of age. Caregivers of children with PFD are at risk for poor mental health outcomes, but there is limited research on the unique strengths that caregivers develop or leverage to help navigate the stress of caring for a child with PFD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The scoping review followed a standard framework and PRISMA-ScR guidelines to analyze studies focusing on caregivers of children with PFD or feeding-related issues. Definitions of strengths were defined by the 24 character strengths framework, outlined in the Values in Action Inventory of Strengths (VIA-IS), which highlights positive traits of humans. A comprehensive search of four databases identified 1,174 articles, which were screened based on inclusion criteria, resulting in 11 studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No studies directly investigated the strengths of caregivers as their primary outcome; however, multiple strengths were identified by coding strengths consistent with the VIA-IS across findings of the 11 included articles. Identified strengths highlighted caregiver resilience, with hope being the most frequent strength across studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Strengths can be protective factors of caregiver mental health. However, there is limited literature on the strengths in caregivers of children with PFD, and how they develop over time. A small number of studies have identified the presence of multiple strengths among caregivers of children with PFD, but more research is needed to understand how we can leverage strengths to improve caregiver and child resiliency.</p>","PeriodicalId":48372,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"527-537"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13286263/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsag013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This scoping review investigates the character strengths of caregivers of children with pediatric feeding disorder (PFD), which impacts 1 in 37 children under 5 years of age. Caregivers of children with PFD are at risk for poor mental health outcomes, but there is limited research on the unique strengths that caregivers develop or leverage to help navigate the stress of caring for a child with PFD.

Methods: The scoping review followed a standard framework and PRISMA-ScR guidelines to analyze studies focusing on caregivers of children with PFD or feeding-related issues. Definitions of strengths were defined by the 24 character strengths framework, outlined in the Values in Action Inventory of Strengths (VIA-IS), which highlights positive traits of humans. A comprehensive search of four databases identified 1,174 articles, which were screened based on inclusion criteria, resulting in 11 studies.

Results: No studies directly investigated the strengths of caregivers as their primary outcome; however, multiple strengths were identified by coding strengths consistent with the VIA-IS across findings of the 11 included articles. Identified strengths highlighted caregiver resilience, with hope being the most frequent strength across studies.

Conclusions: Strengths can be protective factors of caregiver mental health. However, there is limited literature on the strengths in caregivers of children with PFD, and how they develop over time. A small number of studies have identified the presence of multiple strengths among caregivers of children with PFD, but more research is needed to understand how we can leverage strengths to improve caregiver and child resiliency.

儿童喂养障碍护理人员的优势:范围审查。
目的:本综述调查了患有小儿喂养障碍(PFD)儿童的照顾者的性格优势,该疾病影响了37名5岁以下儿童中的1名。患有PFD的儿童的照顾者有不良心理健康结果的风险,但关于照顾者发展或利用独特优势来帮助处理照顾患有PFD的儿童的压力的研究有限。方法:范围审查遵循标准框架和PRISMA-ScR指南来分析关注PFD儿童护理人员或喂养相关问题的研究。优势的定义是由24个性格优势框架定义的,在行动价值优势清单(VIA-IS)中概述,它突出了人类的积极特征。对四个数据库进行全面检索,确定了1174篇文章,根据纳入标准对其进行筛选,最终得到11篇研究。结果:没有研究直接调查照顾者的优势作为他们的主要结局;然而,通过与VIA-IS在11篇纳入的文章中的发现一致的编码优势来识别多重优势。确定的优势突出了照顾者的韧性,希望是研究中最常见的优势。结论:优势可能是照顾者心理健康的保护因素。然而,关于PFD儿童护理人员的优势以及他们如何随着时间的推移而发展的文献有限。少数研究已经确定了PFD儿童的照顾者中存在多种优势,但需要更多的研究来了解我们如何利用优势来提高照顾者和儿童的复原力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pediatric Psychology
Journal of Pediatric Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
89
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pediatric Psychology is the official journal of the Society of Pediatric Psychology, Division 54 of the American Psychological Association. The Journal of Pediatric Psychology publishes articles related to theory, research, and professional practice in pediatric psychology. Pediatric psychology is an integrated field of science and practice in which the principles of psychology are applied within the context of pediatric health. The field aims to promote the health and development of children, adolescents, and their families through use of evidence-based methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书