Capturing Collaboration: Validation of the Intraprofessional Collaborative Practice Survey in Occupational Therapy Students.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Chia-Wei Fan, Yen-Chun Wang, Chung-Ying Lin
{"title":"Capturing Collaboration: Validation of the Intraprofessional Collaborative Practice Survey in Occupational Therapy Students.","authors":"Chia-Wei Fan, Yen-Chun Wang, Chung-Ying Lin","doi":"10.5014/ajot.2026.051463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Intraprofessional collaboration between occupational therapists and occupational therapy assistants enhances treatment outcomes and ensures coordinated and client-centered care. Although the Intraprofessional Collaborative Practice Survey (ICPS) was developed to assess intraprofessional collaboration, psychometric validation has not been established.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the psychometric properties of the ICPS among occupational therapy students in the United States.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Accredited occupational therapy programs across the United States.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 389 occupational therapy students (236 in master of occupational therapy [MOT] programs and 153 in occupational therapy doctorate [OTD] programs) completed the ICPS. A subset of 289 students also completed an adapted version of the Interprofessional Collaborative Competency Attainment Survey (ICCAS).</p><p><strong>Outcomes and measures: </strong>The ICPS, occupational therapy version, and an adapted version of the ICCAS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Factor analyses supported the hypothesized four-domain structure for both perceived importance and perceived ability modules in the ICPS. Internal consistency was excellent. Evidence of convergent, discriminant, and concurrent validity was found, with moderate to strong correlations with the ICCAS. Measurement invariance was supported across MOT and OTD program students.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The ICPS is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing intraprofessional collaboration competencies. Its alignment with the Accreditation Council for Occupational Therapy Education's 2023 practice-based standards underscores its value for program evaluation and professional development.</p><p><strong>Plain-language summary: </strong>Collaboration between occupational therapists and occupational therapy assistants is essential for safe, effective client care. This study validated the use of the Intraprofessional Collaborative Practice Survey (ICPS) among occupational therapy students and found it to be reliable and consistent across master's and doctoral programs. The ICPS can help educators and researchers evaluate student learning, track collaboration competencies, and strengthen training programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48317,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":"80 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2026.051463","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Intraprofessional collaboration between occupational therapists and occupational therapy assistants enhances treatment outcomes and ensures coordinated and client-centered care. Although the Intraprofessional Collaborative Practice Survey (ICPS) was developed to assess intraprofessional collaboration, psychometric validation has not been established.

Objective: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the ICPS among occupational therapy students in the United States.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Setting: Accredited occupational therapy programs across the United States.

Participants: A total of 389 occupational therapy students (236 in master of occupational therapy [MOT] programs and 153 in occupational therapy doctorate [OTD] programs) completed the ICPS. A subset of 289 students also completed an adapted version of the Interprofessional Collaborative Competency Attainment Survey (ICCAS).

Outcomes and measures: The ICPS, occupational therapy version, and an adapted version of the ICCAS.

Results: Factor analyses supported the hypothesized four-domain structure for both perceived importance and perceived ability modules in the ICPS. Internal consistency was excellent. Evidence of convergent, discriminant, and concurrent validity was found, with moderate to strong correlations with the ICCAS. Measurement invariance was supported across MOT and OTD program students.

Conclusions and relevance: The ICPS is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing intraprofessional collaboration competencies. Its alignment with the Accreditation Council for Occupational Therapy Education's 2023 practice-based standards underscores its value for program evaluation and professional development.

Plain-language summary: Collaboration between occupational therapists and occupational therapy assistants is essential for safe, effective client care. This study validated the use of the Intraprofessional Collaborative Practice Survey (ICPS) among occupational therapy students and found it to be reliable and consistent across master's and doctoral programs. The ICPS can help educators and researchers evaluate student learning, track collaboration competencies, and strengthen training programs.

捕获协作:职业治疗学生专业内协作实践调查的验证。
重要性:职业治疗师和职业治疗助理之间的专业内合作提高了治疗效果,并确保协调和以客户为中心的护理。虽然制定了专业内协作实践调查(ICPS)来评估专业内协作,但心理测量验证尚未建立。目的:评价美国职业治疗专业学生的ICPS心理测量特征。设计:横断面研究。背景:美国认可的职业治疗项目。参与者:共有389名职业治疗学生(236名职业治疗硕士和153名职业治疗博士)完成了ICPS。289名学生还完成了一份改编版的跨专业协作能力成就调查(ICCAS)。结果和测量:ICPS,职业治疗版本,和ICCAS的改编版本。结果:因素分析支持ICPS中感知重要性和感知能力模块的四域结构假设。内部一致性非常好。发现了收敛效度、判别效度和并发效度的证据,它们与ICCAS具有中等到强的相关性。测量不变性在MOT和OTD项目学生中得到支持。结论和相关性:ICPS是评估专业内部合作能力的有效和可靠的工具。它与职业治疗教育认证委员会2023年基于实践的标准保持一致,强调了它对项目评估和专业发展的价值。简单的语言总结:职业治疗师和职业治疗助理之间的合作对于安全、有效的客户护理至关重要。本研究验证了职业治疗专业内合作实践调查(ICPS)在职业治疗专业学生中的应用,并发现它在硕士和博士课程中是可靠和一致的。ICPS可以帮助教育工作者和研究人员评估学生的学习情况,跟踪合作能力,并加强培训计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
406
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Occupational Therapy (AJOT) is an official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc. and is published 6 times per year. This peer reviewed journal focuses on research, practice, and health care issues in the field of occupational therapy. AOTA members receive 6 issues of AJOT per year and have online access to archived abstracts and full-text articles. Nonmembers may view abstracts online but must purchase full-text articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书