CONTROLLING CULICOIDES BITING MIDGES WITH PURPOSE-GROWN VEGETATION BARRIERS IN RESIDENTIAL COASTAL AREAS: AN INTEGRATED APPROACH WITH BENEFITS FOR MOSQUITO MANAGEMENT.

IF 1 4区 农林科学 Q3 ENTOMOLOGY
Brian J Johnson, Kriss Mahoney, Janine Clark, Gregor J Devine
{"title":"CONTROLLING CULICOIDES BITING MIDGES WITH PURPOSE-GROWN VEGETATION BARRIERS IN RESIDENTIAL COASTAL AREAS: AN INTEGRATED APPROACH WITH BENEFITS FOR MOSQUITO MANAGEMENT.","authors":"Brian J Johnson, Kriss Mahoney, Janine Clark, Gregor J Devine","doi":"10.2987/25-7261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Culicoides biting midges are a major nuisance in coastal residential areas of Australia, yet effective control strategies remain limited. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a residual insecticide treatment applied to a purpose-grown vegetation barrier in reducing biting midge nuisance in adjacent coastal residences, with secondary effects on mosquito abundance also monitored. Biting midge and mosquito populations were monitored continuously using automated smart traps (BG-Counter®) over 18 wk, including 11 wk of pretreatment and 7 wk posttreatment surveillance. During the pretreatment surveillance period, properties adjacent to the vegetation barrier (n = 4) recorded 71% fewer biting midges than nonadjacent properties (n = 2), although this effect was temporally variable (95% confidence interval [CI]: -95% to +55%) and not significant. No reduction in mosquito abundance was observed during the same period. Following treatment of the barrier with a residual insecticide (BiFlex AquaMax®, bifenthrin 100 g/liter), biting midge and mosquito populations declined by 86% (95% CI: 77-92%) and 79% (95% CI: 68-86%), respectively, across the study landscape, including in areas with and without the vegetation barrier. A significant barrier-insecticide interaction for both groups indicated that reductions were greatest in residences adjacent to the vegetation barrier. Decreases in mosquito abundance following application of the residual spray suggests that the vegetation barrier functioned as important harborage habitat, enabling targeted control within and beyond its immediate boundary. These findings support the integration of insecticide-treated vegetation barriers into pest management programs targeting nuisance biting midge and mosquito populations in coastal residential environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":17192,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association","volume":" ","pages":"70-76"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2987/25-7261","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Culicoides biting midges are a major nuisance in coastal residential areas of Australia, yet effective control strategies remain limited. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a residual insecticide treatment applied to a purpose-grown vegetation barrier in reducing biting midge nuisance in adjacent coastal residences, with secondary effects on mosquito abundance also monitored. Biting midge and mosquito populations were monitored continuously using automated smart traps (BG-Counter®) over 18 wk, including 11 wk of pretreatment and 7 wk posttreatment surveillance. During the pretreatment surveillance period, properties adjacent to the vegetation barrier (n = 4) recorded 71% fewer biting midges than nonadjacent properties (n = 2), although this effect was temporally variable (95% confidence interval [CI]: -95% to +55%) and not significant. No reduction in mosquito abundance was observed during the same period. Following treatment of the barrier with a residual insecticide (BiFlex AquaMax®, bifenthrin 100 g/liter), biting midge and mosquito populations declined by 86% (95% CI: 77-92%) and 79% (95% CI: 68-86%), respectively, across the study landscape, including in areas with and without the vegetation barrier. A significant barrier-insecticide interaction for both groups indicated that reductions were greatest in residences adjacent to the vegetation barrier. Decreases in mosquito abundance following application of the residual spray suggests that the vegetation barrier functioned as important harborage habitat, enabling targeted control within and beyond its immediate boundary. These findings support the integration of insecticide-treated vegetation barriers into pest management programs targeting nuisance biting midge and mosquito populations in coastal residential environments.

在沿海居民区用专门种植的植被屏障控制库伊蚊叮咬蠓:一种有利于蚊虫管理的综合方法。
库蠓是澳大利亚沿海居民区的主要害虫,但有效的控制策略仍然有限。本研究评估了在专门种植的植被屏障上使用残留杀虫剂处理减少邻近沿海居民的蠓害的有效性,并监测了对蚊子数量的二次影响。采用自动智能诱捕器(BG-Counter®)连续监测蠓和蚊虫种群,监测时间为18周,包括11周的预处理监测和7周的处理后监测。在预处理监测期间,靠近植被屏障(n = 4)的生境比不靠近植被屏障(n = 2)的生境记录到的蠓只少71%,尽管这种影响是随时间变化的(95%置信区间[CI]: -95%至+55%),并不显著。在同一时期,蚊子数量没有减少。在使用残留杀虫剂(BiFlex AquaMax®,联苯菊酯100克/升)处理屏障后,整个研究景观(包括有和没有植被屏障的地区)的蠓和蚊子数量分别下降了86% (95% CI: 77-92%)和79% (95% CI: 68-86%)。两组的屏障-杀虫剂相互作用表明,在靠近植被屏障的住宅中,减少幅度最大。施用残留喷雾剂后,蚊子数量减少,这表明植被屏障是重要的窝藏栖息地,可以在其直接边界内外进行有针对性的控制。这些发现支持将经杀虫剂处理的植被屏障纳入针对沿海居住环境中讨厌的叮蚊和蚊子种群的害虫管理计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association (JAMCA) encourages the submission of previously unpublished manuscripts contributing to the advancement of knowledge of mosquitoes and other arthropod vectors. The Journal encourages submission of a wide range of scientific studies that include all aspects of biology, ecology, systematics, and integrated pest management. Manuscripts exceeding normal length (e. g., monographs) may be accepted for publication as a supplement to the regular issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书