Should Exome Sequencing Replace Chromosomal Microarray Analysis in Suspected Skeletal Dysplasias? Lessons from a Case of Osteogenesis Imperfecta.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-18 DOI:10.1159/000551269
Gustavo Betin, Mariana Devia, Walter Annicchiarico, Patrizia Iannello, María Moreno, Natalia Maestre, Jezid Miranda
{"title":"Should Exome Sequencing Replace Chromosomal Microarray Analysis in Suspected Skeletal Dysplasias? Lessons from a Case of Osteogenesis Imperfecta.","authors":"Gustavo Betin, Mariana Devia, Walter Annicchiarico, Patrizia Iannello, María Moreno, Natalia Maestre, Jezid Miranda","doi":"10.1159/000551269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Skeletal dysplasias are genetically heterogeneous disorders characterized by high diagnostic complexity and major perinatal impact. Under current diagnostic guidelines, chromosomal microarray remains the recommended first-tier test for fetal anomalies. However, in suspected skeletal dysplasias ‑ where sequencing provides a markedly higher diagnostic yield ‑ starting with chromosomal microarray testing may delay diagnosis. Recent advances in next-generation sequencing, along with the 2022 International Society of Skeletal Dysplasias classification, now allow for earlier and more precise evaluation. We present a case of life-limiting osteogenesis imperfecta diagnosed prenatally through exome sequencing (ES), highlighting its efficiency and diagnostic advantage over chromosomal microarray analysis.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>A 24-year-old primigravida was assessed during first trimester screening in Cartagena, Colombia. Ultrasound at 13 weeks revealed multiple fetal anomalies suggestive of skeletal dysplasia. Chorionic villus sampling was performed, and molecular analysis with ES identified a heterozygous substitution NM_000088.3:c.1291G>T (p.Gly431Cys) in COL1A1, located in the triple helix domain of type I collagen. This variant was absent from genomic databases and showed previously documented glycine substitutions, being classified as \"likely pathogenic.\" The patient opted for legal termination of pregnancy, and fetal histopathology confirmed osteogenesis imperfecta.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This novel COL1A1 variant reinforces the role of glycine substitutions in osteogenesis imperfecta. While chromosomal microarray remains first-tier, ES offers a faster and more efficient pathway for diagnosing suspected skeletal dysplasias, enhancing early counseling in resource-limited settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":12189,"journal":{"name":"Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"435-443"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000551269","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Skeletal dysplasias are genetically heterogeneous disorders characterized by high diagnostic complexity and major perinatal impact. Under current diagnostic guidelines, chromosomal microarray remains the recommended first-tier test for fetal anomalies. However, in suspected skeletal dysplasias ‑ where sequencing provides a markedly higher diagnostic yield ‑ starting with chromosomal microarray testing may delay diagnosis. Recent advances in next-generation sequencing, along with the 2022 International Society of Skeletal Dysplasias classification, now allow for earlier and more precise evaluation. We present a case of life-limiting osteogenesis imperfecta diagnosed prenatally through exome sequencing (ES), highlighting its efficiency and diagnostic advantage over chromosomal microarray analysis.

Case presentation: A 24-year-old primigravida was assessed during first trimester screening in Cartagena, Colombia. Ultrasound at 13 weeks revealed multiple fetal anomalies suggestive of skeletal dysplasia. Chorionic villus sampling was performed, and molecular analysis with ES identified a heterozygous substitution NM_000088.3:c.1291G>T (p.Gly431Cys) in COL1A1, located in the triple helix domain of type I collagen. This variant was absent from genomic databases and showed previously documented glycine substitutions, being classified as "likely pathogenic." The patient opted for legal termination of pregnancy, and fetal histopathology confirmed osteogenesis imperfecta.

Conclusion: This novel COL1A1 variant reinforces the role of glycine substitutions in osteogenesis imperfecta. While chromosomal microarray remains first-tier, ES offers a faster and more efficient pathway for diagnosing suspected skeletal dysplasias, enhancing early counseling in resource-limited settings.

外显子组测序是否应该取代疑似骨骼发育不良的染色体微阵列分析?成骨不全症1例的经验教训。
骨骼发育不良是一种遗传异质性疾病,其特点是诊断复杂性高,对围产期影响大。在目前的诊断指南下,染色体微阵列仍然是胎儿异常的首选检测方法。然而,在可疑的骨骼发育不良中,测序提供了明显更高的诊断率,从染色体微阵列检测开始可能会延迟诊断。新一代测序的最新进展,以及2022年国际骨骼发育不良协会的分类,现在允许更早和更精确的评估。我们提出了一个通过外显子组测序产前诊断的限制性成骨不全的病例,突出了其效率和诊断优势染色体微阵列分析。病例报告:在哥伦比亚卡塔赫纳,一名24岁的初产妇在妊娠早期筛查期间进行了评估。13周超声显示多胎异常提示骨骼发育不良。绒毛膜绒毛取样,通过外显子组测序进行分子分析,鉴定出一个杂合替代NM_000088.3:c。COL1A1中的1291G>T (p.Gly431Cys),位于I型胶原蛋白的三螺旋结构域。这种变异在基因组数据库中不存在,并显示了先前记录的甘氨酸替代,被归类为“可能致病”。患者选择合法终止妊娠,胎儿组织病理学证实成骨不全。结论:这种新的COL1A1变异加强了甘氨酸替代在成骨不完全性中的作用。虽然染色体微阵列仍然是一线,但ES提供了更快、更有效的途径来诊断可疑的骨骼发育不良,在资源有限的情况下加强早期咨询。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy
Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
48
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The first journal to focus on the fetus as a patient, ''Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy'' provides a wide range of biomedical specialists with a single source of reports encompassing the common discipline of fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书