Clinical added value of triplicate electrocardiograms: a review of 505 triplicate sets.

IF 3.4 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Michael S Ewer, Hyeon-Ju Ryo Ali, Nicolas L Palaskas, Jay Herson, Anita Deswal
{"title":"Clinical added value of triplicate electrocardiograms: a review of 505 triplicate sets.","authors":"Michael S Ewer, Hyeon-Ju Ryo Ali, Nicolas L Palaskas, Jay Herson, Anita Deswal","doi":"10.1186/s40959-026-00472-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Triplicate electrocardiograms (ECGs) are routinely included in clinical trials where concern of agent-induced electrophysiological alterations arise. Three electrocardiograms (triplicate ECGs) are obtained over a time interval of less than 10 min with the intent to increase recognition of changes, and to provide increased data for measurement and review of physiologic intervals. We undertook a prospective review of over 500 sets of triplicate ECGs to evaluate the added value of two additional tracings over a single ECG. Our review was done exclusively to evaluate the actual ECG tracings and not the reproducibility of the electronic interpretive algorithms. All ECGs were reviewed by one of the cardiologists over a four-month period. We found no meaningful changes in R-R, P-R, or Q-T intervals, nor any change in the QRS duration that was observed during the ≤ 10-minute period of data acquisition; rare supraventricular and ventricular ectopy was noted in 4 of the 505 triplicate sets. The routine inclusion of a requirement for triplicate ECGs should be revaluated to assess the added value to the patient or clinical research as well as potential burdens to the patient and financial impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":9804,"journal":{"name":"Cardio-oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13122879/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardio-oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40959-026-00472-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Triplicate electrocardiograms (ECGs) are routinely included in clinical trials where concern of agent-induced electrophysiological alterations arise. Three electrocardiograms (triplicate ECGs) are obtained over a time interval of less than 10 min with the intent to increase recognition of changes, and to provide increased data for measurement and review of physiologic intervals. We undertook a prospective review of over 500 sets of triplicate ECGs to evaluate the added value of two additional tracings over a single ECG. Our review was done exclusively to evaluate the actual ECG tracings and not the reproducibility of the electronic interpretive algorithms. All ECGs were reviewed by one of the cardiologists over a four-month period. We found no meaningful changes in R-R, P-R, or Q-T intervals, nor any change in the QRS duration that was observed during the ≤ 10-minute period of data acquisition; rare supraventricular and ventricular ectopy was noted in 4 of the 505 triplicate sets. The routine inclusion of a requirement for triplicate ECGs should be revaluated to assess the added value to the patient or clinical research as well as potential burdens to the patient and financial impact.

505组三重心电图的临床附加价值。
三重心电图(ECGs)通常包括在临床试验中,担心药物引起的电生理改变。在不到10分钟的时间间隔内获得三张心电图(三份心电图),目的是增加对变化的认识,并为生理间隔的测量和回顾提供更多的数据。我们对500多组三次心电图进行了前瞻性回顾,以评估在单次心电图上增加两次追踪的附加价值。我们的回顾仅仅是为了评估实际的心电示踪,而不是电子解释算法的再现性。在四个月的时间里,所有的心电图都由一位心脏病专家检查。我们发现R-R、P-R或Q-T间隔没有显著变化,在≤10分钟的数据采集期间,QRS持续时间也没有任何变化;505组中有4组出现罕见的室上和心室异位。应重新评估常规纳入三份心电图的要求,以评估对患者或临床研究的附加价值,以及对患者的潜在负担和经济影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardio-oncology
Cardio-oncology Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书