求助PDF
{"title":"Relative Comparison of the Static Magnetic Field and Oscillating Magnetic Field Effects on Gram-Negative and Gram-Positive Bacteria via Evaluating Oxidative Stress and DNA Fragmentation","authors":"Hatice Baş, Hatice Kanbur Çavuş, Nicola Morley, Recep Şahingöz","doi":"10.1002/bem.70050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The effects of static magnetic field (SMF) and oscillating magnetic field (OMF) on oxidative stress responses and DNA fragmentation were investigated in <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> and <i>Escherichia coli</i>. Bacterial cultures were exposed to magnetic field intensities ranging from 2 to 16 mT at 50 Hz for 8 h. Exposure to both SMF and OMF caused intensity-dependent decreases in optical density, indicating growth inhibition. In parallel, nitric oxide and superoxide anion radical levels, as well as the activities of catalase and superoxide dismutase, increased significantly in a field-strength–dependent manner. Glutathione disulfide levels were enhanced while reduced glutathione values decreased, reflecting a redox imbalance. Moreover, malondialdehyde and DNA fragmentation levels were markedly elevated, confirming oxidative and genotoxic stress. Comparative analysis revealed that <i>E. coli</i> exhibited more pronounced responses than <i>S. aureus</i>, with significant effects emerging above approximately 6–8 mT for OMF and 8–10 mT for SMF exposure. Overall, these findings demonstrate that both OMF and SMF can induce oxidative stress and DNA damage in bacterial cells, with OMF producing stronger effects. The results highlight the differential susceptibility of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria to electromagnetic exposure and suggest potential implications for non-antibiotic antimicrobial strategies based on magnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics. 00:00–00, 2026. © 2026 © 2026 Bioelectromagnetics Society.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8956,"journal":{"name":"Bioelectromagnetics","volume":"47 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioelectromagnetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bem.70050","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
引用
批量引用
Abstract
The effects of static magnetic field (SMF) and oscillating magnetic field (OMF) on oxidative stress responses and DNA fragmentation were investigated in Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli . Bacterial cultures were exposed to magnetic field intensities ranging from 2 to 16 mT at 50 Hz for 8 h. Exposure to both SMF and OMF caused intensity-dependent decreases in optical density, indicating growth inhibition. In parallel, nitric oxide and superoxide anion radical levels, as well as the activities of catalase and superoxide dismutase, increased significantly in a field-strength–dependent manner. Glutathione disulfide levels were enhanced while reduced glutathione values decreased, reflecting a redox imbalance. Moreover, malondialdehyde and DNA fragmentation levels were markedly elevated, confirming oxidative and genotoxic stress. Comparative analysis revealed that E. coli exhibited more pronounced responses than S. aureus , with significant effects emerging above approximately 6–8 mT for OMF and 8–10 mT for SMF exposure. Overall, these findings demonstrate that both OMF and SMF can induce oxidative stress and DNA damage in bacterial cells, with OMF producing stronger effects. The results highlight the differential susceptibility of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria to electromagnetic exposure and suggest potential implications for non-antibiotic antimicrobial strategies based on magnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics. 00:00–00, 2026. © 2026 © 2026 Bioelectromagnetics Society.
静态磁场和振荡磁场对革兰氏阴性菌和革兰氏阳性菌氧化应激和DNA断裂影响的相对比较
研究了静磁场(SMF)和振荡磁场(OMF)对金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌氧化应激反应和DNA断裂的影响。将细菌培养物暴露在强度为2至16 mT、频率为50 Hz的磁场中8小时。暴露于SMF和OMF都会引起光密度的强度依赖性降低,表明生长受到抑制。与此同时,一氧化氮和超氧阴离子自由基水平以及过氧化氢酶和超氧化物歧化酶的活性都以电场强度依赖的方式显著增加。谷胱甘肽二硫水平增加,而还原性谷胱甘肽值下降,反映了氧化还原失衡。此外,丙二醛和DNA断裂水平显著升高,证实了氧化和基因毒性应激。对比分析显示,大肠杆菌比金黄色葡萄球菌表现出更明显的反应,在大约6-8 mT的OMF和8-10 mT的SMF暴露中出现了显著的影响。综上所述,这些发现表明OMF和SMF都能诱导细菌细胞氧化应激和DNA损伤,其中OMF的作用更强。结果强调了革兰氏阳性和革兰氏阴性细菌对电磁暴露的不同敏感性,并提出了基于磁场的非抗生素抗菌策略的潜在影响。生物电磁学[j] . 2026 - 2026。©2026©2026生物电磁学学会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。