Relative Comparison of the Static Magnetic Field and Oscillating Magnetic Field Effects on Gram-Negative and Gram-Positive Bacteria via Evaluating Oxidative Stress and DNA Fragmentation

IF 1.6 3区 生物学 Q3 BIOLOGY
Hatice Baş, Hatice Kanbur Çavuş, Nicola Morley, Recep Şahingöz
{"title":"Relative Comparison of the Static Magnetic Field and Oscillating Magnetic Field Effects on Gram-Negative and Gram-Positive Bacteria via Evaluating Oxidative Stress and DNA Fragmentation","authors":"Hatice Baş,&nbsp;Hatice Kanbur Çavuş,&nbsp;Nicola Morley,&nbsp;Recep Şahingöz","doi":"10.1002/bem.70050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The effects of static magnetic field (SMF) and oscillating magnetic field (OMF) on oxidative stress responses and DNA fragmentation were investigated in <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> and <i>Escherichia coli</i>. Bacterial cultures were exposed to magnetic field intensities ranging from 2 to 16 mT at 50 Hz for 8 h. Exposure to both SMF and OMF caused intensity-dependent decreases in optical density, indicating growth inhibition. In parallel, nitric oxide and superoxide anion radical levels, as well as the activities of catalase and superoxide dismutase, increased significantly in a field-strength–dependent manner. Glutathione disulfide levels were enhanced while reduced glutathione values decreased, reflecting a redox imbalance. Moreover, malondialdehyde and DNA fragmentation levels were markedly elevated, confirming oxidative and genotoxic stress. Comparative analysis revealed that <i>E. coli</i> exhibited more pronounced responses than <i>S. aureus</i>, with significant effects emerging above approximately 6–8 mT for OMF and 8–10 mT for SMF exposure. Overall, these findings demonstrate that both OMF and SMF can induce oxidative stress and DNA damage in bacterial cells, with OMF producing stronger effects. The results highlight the differential susceptibility of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria to electromagnetic exposure and suggest potential implications for non-antibiotic antimicrobial strategies based on magnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics. 00:00–00, 2026. © 2026 © 2026 Bioelectromagnetics Society.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8956,"journal":{"name":"Bioelectromagnetics","volume":"47 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioelectromagnetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bem.70050","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The effects of static magnetic field (SMF) and oscillating magnetic field (OMF) on oxidative stress responses and DNA fragmentation were investigated in Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. Bacterial cultures were exposed to magnetic field intensities ranging from 2 to 16 mT at 50 Hz for 8 h. Exposure to both SMF and OMF caused intensity-dependent decreases in optical density, indicating growth inhibition. In parallel, nitric oxide and superoxide anion radical levels, as well as the activities of catalase and superoxide dismutase, increased significantly in a field-strength–dependent manner. Glutathione disulfide levels were enhanced while reduced glutathione values decreased, reflecting a redox imbalance. Moreover, malondialdehyde and DNA fragmentation levels were markedly elevated, confirming oxidative and genotoxic stress. Comparative analysis revealed that E. coli exhibited more pronounced responses than S. aureus, with significant effects emerging above approximately 6–8 mT for OMF and 8–10 mT for SMF exposure. Overall, these findings demonstrate that both OMF and SMF can induce oxidative stress and DNA damage in bacterial cells, with OMF producing stronger effects. The results highlight the differential susceptibility of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria to electromagnetic exposure and suggest potential implications for non-antibiotic antimicrobial strategies based on magnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics. 00:00–00, 2026. © 2026 © 2026 Bioelectromagnetics Society.

静态磁场和振荡磁场对革兰氏阴性菌和革兰氏阳性菌氧化应激和DNA断裂影响的相对比较
研究了静磁场(SMF)和振荡磁场(OMF)对金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌氧化应激反应和DNA断裂的影响。将细菌培养物暴露在强度为2至16 mT、频率为50 Hz的磁场中8小时。暴露于SMF和OMF都会引起光密度的强度依赖性降低,表明生长受到抑制。与此同时,一氧化氮和超氧阴离子自由基水平以及过氧化氢酶和超氧化物歧化酶的活性都以电场强度依赖的方式显著增加。谷胱甘肽二硫水平增加,而还原性谷胱甘肽值下降,反映了氧化还原失衡。此外,丙二醛和DNA断裂水平显著升高,证实了氧化和基因毒性应激。对比分析显示,大肠杆菌比金黄色葡萄球菌表现出更明显的反应,在大约6-8 mT的OMF和8-10 mT的SMF暴露中出现了显著的影响。综上所述,这些发现表明OMF和SMF都能诱导细菌细胞氧化应激和DNA损伤,其中OMF的作用更强。结果强调了革兰氏阳性和革兰氏阴性细菌对电磁暴露的不同敏感性,并提出了基于磁场的非抗生素抗菌策略的潜在影响。生物电磁学[j] . 2026 - 2026。©2026©2026生物电磁学学会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bioelectromagnetics
Bioelectromagnetics 生物-生物物理
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Bioelectromagnetics is published by Wiley-Liss, Inc., for the Bioelectromagnetics Society and is the official journal of the Bioelectromagnetics Society and the European Bioelectromagnetics Association. It is a peer-reviewed, internationally circulated scientific journal that specializes in reporting original data on biological effects and applications of electromagnetic fields that range in frequency from zero hertz (static fields) to the terahertz undulations and visible light. Both experimental and clinical data are of interest to the journal''s readers as are theoretical papers or reviews that offer novel insights into or criticism of contemporary concepts and theories of field-body interactions. The Bioelectromagnetics Society, which sponsors the journal, also welcomes experimental or clinical papers on the domains of sonic and ultrasonic radiation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书