Anatomical variation of the sciatic nerve division in the cadaver studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.1 Q3 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY
Anatomy & Cell Biology Pub Date : 2026-06-30 Epub Date: 2026-03-19 DOI:10.5115/acb.25.139
Worku Abie Liyew, Soressa Abebe
{"title":"Anatomical variation of the sciatic nerve division in the cadaver studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Worku Abie Liyew, Soressa Abebe","doi":"10.5115/acb.25.139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The extent and patterns of variability in the sciatic nerve (SN) division are not well documented in cadaver studies. This review aimed to determine the pooled prevalence and distribution patterns of anatomical variations in the SN division, from existing cadaveric studies, and to explore their potential clinical implications. Articles were searched in PubMed, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, African Journals Online, and other relevant sources. Stata 14 software was used for data analysis. The prevalence was calculated using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochran Q test and the I<sup>2</sup> values of a forest plot. Publication bias was checked using funnel plots and Egger's test. Twenty cadaver studies were used for this systematic review and meta-analysis. In this study, the pooled prevalence of the anatomical variation of the SN division was approximately 31.01% (95% CI: 16.24-45.78). The subgroup analysis demonstrated the highest variability within the popliteal fossa (21.17%; 95% CI: -2.01-44.34), followed by the pelvic region (11.13%; 95% CI: 5.85-16.40), the middle third of the thigh (7.11%; 95% CI: 3.67-10.55), the gluteal region (4.86%; 95% CI: 2.03-7.69), and the upper third of the thigh (4.74%; 95% CI: 1.71-7.76). In this study, the anatomical variation of the SN division was high, and one in three divisions was outside the typical pattern. The variation of SN division may affect intramuscular injections and surgical procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":7831,"journal":{"name":"Anatomy & Cell Biology","volume":" ","pages":"219-229"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13291707/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatomy & Cell Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5115/acb.25.139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The extent and patterns of variability in the sciatic nerve (SN) division are not well documented in cadaver studies. This review aimed to determine the pooled prevalence and distribution patterns of anatomical variations in the SN division, from existing cadaveric studies, and to explore their potential clinical implications. Articles were searched in PubMed, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, African Journals Online, and other relevant sources. Stata 14 software was used for data analysis. The prevalence was calculated using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochran Q test and the I2 values of a forest plot. Publication bias was checked using funnel plots and Egger's test. Twenty cadaver studies were used for this systematic review and meta-analysis. In this study, the pooled prevalence of the anatomical variation of the SN division was approximately 31.01% (95% CI: 16.24-45.78). The subgroup analysis demonstrated the highest variability within the popliteal fossa (21.17%; 95% CI: -2.01-44.34), followed by the pelvic region (11.13%; 95% CI: 5.85-16.40), the middle third of the thigh (7.11%; 95% CI: 3.67-10.55), the gluteal region (4.86%; 95% CI: 2.03-7.69), and the upper third of the thigh (4.74%; 95% CI: 1.71-7.76). In this study, the anatomical variation of the SN division was high, and one in three divisions was outside the typical pattern. The variation of SN division may affect intramuscular injections and surgical procedures.

尸体研究中坐骨神经分裂的解剖变异:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
在尸体研究中,坐骨神经(SN)分裂的变异性的程度和模式并没有很好的记录。本综述旨在从现有的尸体研究中确定SN分裂解剖变异的总体患病率和分布模式,并探讨其潜在的临床意义。文章在PubMed、b谷歌Scholar、ScienceDirect、African Journals Online和其他相关来源中进行了搜索。采用Stata 14软件进行数据分析。使用随机效应模型计算患病率。采用Cochran Q检验和森林样地I2值评估异质性。采用漏斗图和Egger检验检验发表偏倚。本系统综述和荟萃分析使用了20个尸体研究。在本研究中,SN分裂解剖变异的总发生率约为31.01% (95% CI: 16.24-45.78)。亚组分析显示,腘窝内的变异性最高(21.17%,95% CI: -2.01-44.34),其次是骨盆(11.13%,95% CI: 5.85-16.40),大腿中部(7.11%,95% CI: 3.67-10.55),臀区(4.86%,95% CI: 2.03-7.69)和大腿上三分之一(4.74%,95% CI: 1.71-7.76)。在本研究中,SN分裂的解剖变异很大,三分之一的分裂在典型模式之外。SN分裂的变化可能影响肌内注射和外科手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anatomy & Cell Biology
Anatomy & Cell Biology ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
75
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书