Valma Harjutsalo, Lena M Thorn, Niina Sandholm, Per-Henrik Groop
{"title":"Shrunken Pore Syndrome and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and All-Cause Mortality in Individuals With Type 1 Diabetes With and Without Albuminuria.","authors":"Valma Harjutsalo, Lena M Thorn, Niina Sandholm, Per-Henrik Groop","doi":"10.2337/dc25-2987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the association between \"shrunken pore syndrome\" (SPS), defined as a large discrepancy between estimated glomerular filtration rates based on cystatin C (eGFRcys) and creatinine (eGFRcr), and coronary artery disease (CAD), stroke, peripheral artery disease (PAD), heart failure (HF), and all-cause mortality in individuals with T1D with and without albuminuria.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>The study comprised 3,769 individuals with and without albuminuria from the Finnish Diabetic Nephropathy Study (FinnDiane) who had both serum creatinine (Scr) and serum cystatin C (SCysC) data available.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SPS (eGFRcys/eGFRcr ratio cutoff 0.7) was not associated with CAD or stroke. In those with SPS but without albuminuria, the hazard ratios (HRs) for HF, PAD, and all-cause mortality were 3.07 (95% CI 1.47-6.38), 3.64 (95% CI 1.75-7.57), and 3.08 (95% CI 1.86-5.11). The associations between the eGFRcys/eGFRcr ratio as a continuous variable, as well as eGFRcys alone and HF, PAD, and all-cause mortality were significant in those without albuminuria. In individuals with albuminuria, SPS was only associated with HF (HR 1.54; 95% CI 1.02-2.33), whereas the eGFRcys/eGFRcr ratio as a continuous variable was not associated with any of the outcomes. On the contrary, both eGFRcys and eGFRcr were independently associated with all studied outcomes in those with albuminuria.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings highlight the clinical potential of identifying individuals at increased risk of HF, PAD, and all-cause mortality at an early stage among those with T1D without albuminuria by evaluating both eGFRcys and eGFRcr and their discrepancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":93979,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes care","volume":" ","pages":"874-881"},"PeriodicalIF":16.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/dc25-2987","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the association between "shrunken pore syndrome" (SPS), defined as a large discrepancy between estimated glomerular filtration rates based on cystatin C (eGFRcys) and creatinine (eGFRcr), and coronary artery disease (CAD), stroke, peripheral artery disease (PAD), heart failure (HF), and all-cause mortality in individuals with T1D with and without albuminuria.
Research design and methods: The study comprised 3,769 individuals with and without albuminuria from the Finnish Diabetic Nephropathy Study (FinnDiane) who had both serum creatinine (Scr) and serum cystatin C (SCysC) data available.
Results: SPS (eGFRcys/eGFRcr ratio cutoff 0.7) was not associated with CAD or stroke. In those with SPS but without albuminuria, the hazard ratios (HRs) for HF, PAD, and all-cause mortality were 3.07 (95% CI 1.47-6.38), 3.64 (95% CI 1.75-7.57), and 3.08 (95% CI 1.86-5.11). The associations between the eGFRcys/eGFRcr ratio as a continuous variable, as well as eGFRcys alone and HF, PAD, and all-cause mortality were significant in those without albuminuria. In individuals with albuminuria, SPS was only associated with HF (HR 1.54; 95% CI 1.02-2.33), whereas the eGFRcys/eGFRcr ratio as a continuous variable was not associated with any of the outcomes. On the contrary, both eGFRcys and eGFRcr were independently associated with all studied outcomes in those with albuminuria.
Conclusions: Findings highlight the clinical potential of identifying individuals at increased risk of HF, PAD, and all-cause mortality at an early stage among those with T1D without albuminuria by evaluating both eGFRcys and eGFRcr and their discrepancy.
目的:探讨“孔隙萎缩综合征”(SPS)与T1D患者(伴和不伴蛋白尿)冠状动脉疾病(CAD)、中风、外周动脉疾病(PAD)、心力衰竭(HF)和全因死亡率之间的关系。SPS的定义是基于胱抑制素C (eGFRcys)和肌酐(eGFRcr)估计的肾小球滤过率之间的巨大差异。研究设计和方法:该研究包括来自芬兰糖尿病肾病研究(FinnDiane)的3769名有蛋白尿和无蛋白尿的个体,他们有血清肌酐(Scr)和血清胱抑素C (SCysC)数据。结果:SPS (eGFRcys/eGFRcr比值截止值= 0.7)与CAD或卒中无关。在有SPS但无蛋白尿的患者中,HF、PAD和全因死亡率的危险比(hr)分别为3.07 (95% CI 1.47-6.38)、3.64 (95% CI 1.75-7.57)和3.08 (95% CI 1.86-5.11)。eGFRcys/eGFRcr比值作为一个连续变量,以及eGFRcys单独与HF、PAD和全因死亡率之间的相关性在无蛋白尿的患者中具有显著性。在蛋白尿患者中,SPS仅与HF相关(HR = 1.54; 95% CI 1.02-2.33),而eGFRcys/eGFRcr比值作为一个连续变量与任何结果都无关。相反,eGFRcys和eGFRcr与蛋白尿患者的所有研究结果均独立相关。结论:研究结果强调了通过评估eGFRcys和eGFRcr及其差异,识别无蛋白尿T1D患者早期HF、PAD和全因死亡率风险增加个体的临床潜力。