Beyond Comfort: A Review of the Critical Role of Bedding Selection in Rodent Welfare, Microenvironment, and Research Reproducibility.

Kathryn A O'Connell, Diego Celdran-Bonafonte
{"title":"Beyond Comfort: A Review of the Critical Role of Bedding Selection in Rodent Welfare, Microenvironment, and Research Reproducibility.","authors":"Kathryn A O'Connell, Diego Celdran-Bonafonte","doi":"10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-25-182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This review addresses the critical but often underappreciated influence of bedding selection on rodent welfare, cage microenvironment, occupational health, and research outcomes in biomedical studies. Although contact bedding is widely preferred by mice and rats and is the current industry standard, there is considerable variation in bedding type, volume, sterility, and manufacturer practices, with no established universal protocols. We synthesize over 150 publications, evaluating corncob, wood, and cellulose-based beddings with respect to their physical attributes, absorbency, ammonia management, dust and contaminant control, and support of species-typical behaviors. The review highlights methodological challenges and inconsistent results across studies, with absorbency and ammonia accumulation particularly affected by bedding mass, volume, and microbial contamination, rather than material type alone. Occupational health risks, including ergonomic strain and allergen exposure, are impacted by bedding handling frequency and composition. Animal health is generally not strongly influenced by bedding type, although pine shavings and certain corncob products present toxicity and reproductive risks in some studies. Bedding also has documented impacts on hepatic enzyme induction, neurobehavioral development, pain sensitivity assays, and gut microbiome composition, posing substantial risks for experimental confounding and compromised reproducibility. Based on the evidence, cellulose bedding is recommended for minimizing negative outcomes, but the complexity and variability inherent in bedding selection necessitate careful documentation and transparent reporting. We advocate for standardized detail in publications to ensure comparability and rigor across rodent-based research.</p>","PeriodicalId":94111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13086205/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-25-182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This review addresses the critical but often underappreciated influence of bedding selection on rodent welfare, cage microenvironment, occupational health, and research outcomes in biomedical studies. Although contact bedding is widely preferred by mice and rats and is the current industry standard, there is considerable variation in bedding type, volume, sterility, and manufacturer practices, with no established universal protocols. We synthesize over 150 publications, evaluating corncob, wood, and cellulose-based beddings with respect to their physical attributes, absorbency, ammonia management, dust and contaminant control, and support of species-typical behaviors. The review highlights methodological challenges and inconsistent results across studies, with absorbency and ammonia accumulation particularly affected by bedding mass, volume, and microbial contamination, rather than material type alone. Occupational health risks, including ergonomic strain and allergen exposure, are impacted by bedding handling frequency and composition. Animal health is generally not strongly influenced by bedding type, although pine shavings and certain corncob products present toxicity and reproductive risks in some studies. Bedding also has documented impacts on hepatic enzyme induction, neurobehavioral development, pain sensitivity assays, and gut microbiome composition, posing substantial risks for experimental confounding and compromised reproducibility. Based on the evidence, cellulose bedding is recommended for minimizing negative outcomes, but the complexity and variability inherent in bedding selection necessitate careful documentation and transparent reporting. We advocate for standardized detail in publications to ensure comparability and rigor across rodent-based research.

超越舒适:床上用品选择在啮齿动物福利、微环境和研究可重复性中的关键作用综述。
这篇综述探讨了床上用品选择对啮齿动物福利、笼子微环境、职业健康和生物医学研究成果的关键但经常被低估的影响。虽然接触式床上用品是小鼠和大鼠的首选,也是目前的行业标准,但床上用品的类型、体积、无菌性和制造商的做法存在相当大的差异,没有建立统一的协议。我们综合了150多份出版物,评估了玉米芯、木材和纤维素基床上材料的物理特性、吸收性、氨管理、粉尘和污染物控制以及物种典型行为的支持。该综述强调了方法上的挑战和研究结果的不一致,吸收性和氨积累特别受层理质量、体积和微生物污染的影响,而不仅仅是材料类型。职业健康风险,包括人体工程学应变和过敏原暴露,受到床上用品处理频率和成分的影响。动物健康通常不受垫层类型的强烈影响,尽管在一些研究中,松树屑和某些玉米芯产品存在毒性和生殖风险。床上用品对肝酶诱导、神经行为发育、疼痛敏感性分析和肠道微生物组成的影响也有文献记载,这对实验混淆和降低可重复性构成了重大风险。根据证据,纤维素层理被推荐用于最小化负面结果,但层理选择的复杂性和可变性需要仔细的记录和透明的报告。我们提倡在出版物中标准化细节,以确保跨啮齿动物研究的可比性和严谨性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书