Decentralized clinical trials in cardiovascular disease : A primer for clinical trialists

IF 12.6 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Guillaume Baudry, Prashanth Kulkarni, Tor Biering-Sørensen, Adam D. DeVore, Charles Michael Gibson, Christopher B. Granger, Harriette G. C. Van Spall
{"title":"Decentralized clinical trials in cardiovascular disease : A primer for clinical trialists","authors":"Guillaume Baudry, Prashanth Kulkarni, Tor Biering-Sørensen, Adam D. DeVore, Charles Michael Gibson, Christopher B. Granger, Harriette G. C. Van Spall","doi":"10.1038/s44161-026-00788-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Decentralized clinical trials (DCTs) move trial activities—such as recruitment, consent, delivery of the intervention, data collection and assessment of outcomes—away from traditional research sites to the homes or communities of patients. This participant-centered approach is accomplished through the use of digital health technology, remote monitoring, electronic data capture, and home- or community-based procedures. The advantage of DCTs may include broader trial recruitment pools with greater representativeness, reduced participant burden, greater operational efficiency and the ability to generate evidence in real-world settings. These features are particularly relevant in cardiovascular disease, which imposes a disproportionate population burden in regions where clinical trial centers are lacking. In this Perspective, we outline the essential components of the DCT ecosystem, discuss how DCTs can address key challenges in cardiovascular disease research, and using case examples, highlight operational and regulatory considerations in designing fully or partially (hybrid) decentralized trials. We also review the potential risks of DCTs and propose mitigation strategies to ensure high-quality, safe and reliable trial execution. Baudry et al. review the main components and operational considerations for running decentralized clinical trials, outline their specific advantages for the cardiovascular field, and propose strategies to mitigate their downsides and ensure their quality.","PeriodicalId":74245,"journal":{"name":"Nature cardiovascular research","volume":"5 3","pages":"193-203"},"PeriodicalIF":12.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature cardiovascular research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44161-026-00788-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Decentralized clinical trials (DCTs) move trial activities—such as recruitment, consent, delivery of the intervention, data collection and assessment of outcomes—away from traditional research sites to the homes or communities of patients. This participant-centered approach is accomplished through the use of digital health technology, remote monitoring, electronic data capture, and home- or community-based procedures. The advantage of DCTs may include broader trial recruitment pools with greater representativeness, reduced participant burden, greater operational efficiency and the ability to generate evidence in real-world settings. These features are particularly relevant in cardiovascular disease, which imposes a disproportionate population burden in regions where clinical trial centers are lacking. In this Perspective, we outline the essential components of the DCT ecosystem, discuss how DCTs can address key challenges in cardiovascular disease research, and using case examples, highlight operational and regulatory considerations in designing fully or partially (hybrid) decentralized trials. We also review the potential risks of DCTs and propose mitigation strategies to ensure high-quality, safe and reliable trial execution. Baudry et al. review the main components and operational considerations for running decentralized clinical trials, outline their specific advantages for the cardiovascular field, and propose strategies to mitigate their downsides and ensure their quality.

Abstract Image

分散的心血管疾病临床试验:临床试验入门。
分散临床试验(dct)将试验活动——如招募、同意、提供干预措施、数据收集和结果评估——从传统的研究地点转移到患者的家庭或社区。这种以参与者为中心的方法是通过使用数字卫生技术、远程监测、电子数据采集以及家庭或社区程序来实现的。dct的优势可能包括更广泛的试验招募池,更具代表性,减轻了参与者负担,提高了操作效率,并能够在现实环境中生成证据。这些特征与心血管疾病特别相关,在缺乏临床试验中心的地区,心血管疾病造成了不成比例的人口负担。在这个视角中,我们概述了DCT生态系统的基本组成部分,讨论了DCT如何应对心血管疾病研究中的关键挑战,并通过案例,强调了在设计完全或部分(混合)分散试验时的操作和监管考虑。我们还审查了dct的潜在风险,并提出了缓解策略,以确保高质量、安全和可靠的试验执行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书