Guillaume Baudry, Prashanth Kulkarni, Tor Biering-Sørensen, Adam D. DeVore, Charles Michael Gibson, Christopher B. Granger, Harriette G. C. Van Spall
{"title":"Decentralized clinical trials in cardiovascular disease : A primer for clinical trialists","authors":"Guillaume Baudry, Prashanth Kulkarni, Tor Biering-Sørensen, Adam D. DeVore, Charles Michael Gibson, Christopher B. Granger, Harriette G. C. Van Spall","doi":"10.1038/s44161-026-00788-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Decentralized clinical trials (DCTs) move trial activities—such as recruitment, consent, delivery of the intervention, data collection and assessment of outcomes—away from traditional research sites to the homes or communities of patients. This participant-centered approach is accomplished through the use of digital health technology, remote monitoring, electronic data capture, and home- or community-based procedures. The advantage of DCTs may include broader trial recruitment pools with greater representativeness, reduced participant burden, greater operational efficiency and the ability to generate evidence in real-world settings. These features are particularly relevant in cardiovascular disease, which imposes a disproportionate population burden in regions where clinical trial centers are lacking. In this Perspective, we outline the essential components of the DCT ecosystem, discuss how DCTs can address key challenges in cardiovascular disease research, and using case examples, highlight operational and regulatory considerations in designing fully or partially (hybrid) decentralized trials. We also review the potential risks of DCTs and propose mitigation strategies to ensure high-quality, safe and reliable trial execution. Baudry et al. review the main components and operational considerations for running decentralized clinical trials, outline their specific advantages for the cardiovascular field, and propose strategies to mitigate their downsides and ensure their quality.","PeriodicalId":74245,"journal":{"name":"Nature cardiovascular research","volume":"5 3","pages":"193-203"},"PeriodicalIF":12.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature cardiovascular research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44161-026-00788-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Decentralized clinical trials (DCTs) move trial activities—such as recruitment, consent, delivery of the intervention, data collection and assessment of outcomes—away from traditional research sites to the homes or communities of patients. This participant-centered approach is accomplished through the use of digital health technology, remote monitoring, electronic data capture, and home- or community-based procedures. The advantage of DCTs may include broader trial recruitment pools with greater representativeness, reduced participant burden, greater operational efficiency and the ability to generate evidence in real-world settings. These features are particularly relevant in cardiovascular disease, which imposes a disproportionate population burden in regions where clinical trial centers are lacking. In this Perspective, we outline the essential components of the DCT ecosystem, discuss how DCTs can address key challenges in cardiovascular disease research, and using case examples, highlight operational and regulatory considerations in designing fully or partially (hybrid) decentralized trials. We also review the potential risks of DCTs and propose mitigation strategies to ensure high-quality, safe and reliable trial execution. Baudry et al. review the main components and operational considerations for running decentralized clinical trials, outline their specific advantages for the cardiovascular field, and propose strategies to mitigate their downsides and ensure their quality.