Above- Versus Across-The-Papilla Plastic Stent Placement for Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction in Unresectable Biliary Tract Cancer: A Multicentre IPTW Analysis

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Shinya Kawaguchi, Yoshihide Kanno, Junichi Kaneko, Yosuke Kobayashi, Kazuma Ishikawa, Azumi Suzuki, Takao Iemoto, Toji Murabayashi, Tatsunori Satoh, Eiji Nakatani
{"title":"Above- Versus Across-The-Papilla Plastic Stent Placement for Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction in Unresectable Biliary Tract Cancer: A Multicentre IPTW Analysis","authors":"Shinya Kawaguchi,&nbsp;Yoshihide Kanno,&nbsp;Junichi Kaneko,&nbsp;Yosuke Kobayashi,&nbsp;Kazuma Ishikawa,&nbsp;Azumi Suzuki,&nbsp;Takao Iemoto,&nbsp;Toji Murabayashi,&nbsp;Tatsunori Satoh,&nbsp;Eiji Nakatani","doi":"10.1002/jhbp.70104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Maintaining effective biliary drainage is crucial in the era of prolonged chemotherapy for biliary tract cancer (BTC). Plastic stents (PS) are widely used in malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO); nonetheless, the optimal placement (above- vs. across-the-papilla) remains controversial.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In this multicentre retrospective study, 246 patients with unresectable BTC-related MHBO who underwent clinically successful PS placement between April 2016 and August 2024 were analyzed. Patients were classified into the above-the-papilla (<i>n</i> = 197) and across-the-papilla (<i>n</i> = 49) groups. Baseline imbalances were adjusted using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) with “average treatment effect on the treated”. Covariates included age, sex, primary disease, Bismuth classification, cholangitis, prior drainage, and number of stents. The primary outcome was time to recurrent biliary obstruction (TRBO); secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AEs).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>After IPTW adjustment, effective sample sizes were 47.6 (above-the-papilla group) and 49.0 (across-the-papilla group). The median TRBO was significantly longer in the above-the-papilla group (114 vs. 66 days; <i>p</i> = 0.02), with a hazard ratio of 1.62 (95% confidence interval: 0.97–2.70). OS (457 vs. 366 days; <i>p</i> = 0.99) and AE rates were comparable.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Above-the-papilla PS placement may prolong stent patency without compromising safety in patients with unresectable BTC-related MHBO.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16056,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences","volume":"33 8","pages":"649-659"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhbp.70104","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Maintaining effective biliary drainage is crucial in the era of prolonged chemotherapy for biliary tract cancer (BTC). Plastic stents (PS) are widely used in malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO); nonetheless, the optimal placement (above- vs. across-the-papilla) remains controversial.

Methods

In this multicentre retrospective study, 246 patients with unresectable BTC-related MHBO who underwent clinically successful PS placement between April 2016 and August 2024 were analyzed. Patients were classified into the above-the-papilla (n = 197) and across-the-papilla (n = 49) groups. Baseline imbalances were adjusted using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) with “average treatment effect on the treated”. Covariates included age, sex, primary disease, Bismuth classification, cholangitis, prior drainage, and number of stents. The primary outcome was time to recurrent biliary obstruction (TRBO); secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AEs).

Results

After IPTW adjustment, effective sample sizes were 47.6 (above-the-papilla group) and 49.0 (across-the-papilla group). The median TRBO was significantly longer in the above-the-papilla group (114 vs. 66 days; p = 0.02), with a hazard ratio of 1.62 (95% confidence interval: 0.97–2.70). OS (457 vs. 366 days; p = 0.99) and AE rates were comparable.

Conclusions

Above-the-papilla PS placement may prolong stent patency without compromising safety in patients with unresectable BTC-related MHBO.

以上是一项多中心IPTW分析:在不可切除的胆道癌中,置放塑料支架治疗恶性肝门胆道梗阻的对比。
背景:在胆道癌(BTC)长期化疗的时代,维持有效的胆道引流至关重要。塑料支架(PS)广泛应用于恶性肝门胆道梗阻(MHBO);尽管如此,最佳位置(在乳头上方还是在乳头上方)仍然存在争议。方法:在这项多中心回顾性研究中,分析了2016年4月至2024年8月期间246例临床成功的btc相关MHBO患者。将患者分为乳头上方组(n = 197)和乳头上方组(n = 49)。使用治疗加权逆概率(IPTW)调整基线失衡,“对被治疗者的平均治疗效果”。协变量包括年龄、性别、原发疾病、铋分类、胆管炎、既往引流和支架数量。主要观察指标为复发性胆道梗阻时间(TRBO);次要结局包括总生存期(OS)和不良事件(ae)。结果:IPTW调整后,有效样本量分别为47.6(乳头上方组)和49.0(乳头上方组)。乳头以上组的中位TRBO明显更长(114天比66天,p = 0.02),风险比为1.62(95%可信区间:0.97-2.70)。OS(457天vs 366天;p = 0.99)和AE发生率具有可比性。结论:对于无法切除的btc相关MHBO患者,乳头上放置PS可延长支架通畅,且不影响安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences
Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-SURGERY
自引率
10.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences (JHBPS) is the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences. JHBPS publishes articles dealing with clinical research as well as translational research on all aspects of this field. Coverage includes Original Article, Review Article, Images of Interest, Rapid Communication and an announcement section. Letters to the Editor and comments on the journal’s policies or content are also included. JHBPS welcomes submissions from surgeons, physicians, endoscopists, radiologists, oncologists, and pathologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书