Comparison of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Among 18F-FDG Dual-Gated PET/CT, Single-Gated PET/MRI, and Cardiac MRI.

IF 1.5 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Pariyaporn Toompong, Attapon Jantarato, Dheeratama Siripongsatian, Pimlapat Panperee, Chetsadaporn Promteangtrong, Anchisa Kunawudhi, Peerapon Kiatkittikul, Pradith Lerdsirisuk, Sirinsuda Sombon, Chanisa Chotipsnich
{"title":"Comparison of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Among <sup>18</sup>F-FDG Dual-Gated PET/CT, Single-Gated PET/MRI, and Cardiac MRI.","authors":"Pariyaporn Toompong, Attapon Jantarato, Dheeratama Siripongsatian, Pimlapat Panperee, Chetsadaporn Promteangtrong, Anchisa Kunawudhi, Peerapon Kiatkittikul, Pradith Lerdsirisuk, Sirinsuda Sombon, Chanisa Chotipsnich","doi":"10.2967/jnmt.125.271050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is a critical parameter in the evaluation of cardiac function, and its measurement can guide treatment decisions in patients with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy. We obtained LVEF measurements with gated PET-based methods to determine if they produced comparable results to those obtained with cardiac MRI. <b>Methods:</b> Patients with breast cancer who visited the National Cyclotron and PET Centre, Chulabhorn Hospital, in Bangkok, Thailand, between July 1, 2022, and February 28, 2023, for LVEF assessment were included in this prospective study. All patients underwent PET/CT using 3 different reconstruction techniques: dual-gated with electrocardiography and respiratory gating, dual-gated with artificial intelligence-assisted list-mode respiratory-compensated PET/CT (dual-gated list-mode PET/CT), and single-gated (electrocardiography-gated) PET/CT. Additionally, single-gated PET/MRI and cardiac MRI were performed to collect data on end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), and LVEF. <b>Results:</b> There were no statistically significant differences in LVEF measurements between any modality. Dual-gated PET/CT showed the lowest average percentage difference when compared with cardiac MRI (6.45%). Differences in EDV and ESV were not statistically significant among the PET-based methods but were significant between the cardiac MRI and all PET-based methods, with consistent percentage differences ranging from -37.64% to -39.38% for EDV and -43.68% to -45.32% for ESV. Intraclass correlation coefficients showed moderate to good reliability, and Pearson correlation coefficients indicated good to strong correlations between cardiac MRI and PET/MRI and among PET-based methods. <b>Conclusion:</b> PET-based methods produced comparable LVEF measurements to those obtained by cardiac MRI. The use of PET-based methods to evaluate LVEF may offer advantages in terms of convenience and accessibility in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":16548,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nuclear medicine technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nuclear medicine technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.125.271050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is a critical parameter in the evaluation of cardiac function, and its measurement can guide treatment decisions in patients with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy. We obtained LVEF measurements with gated PET-based methods to determine if they produced comparable results to those obtained with cardiac MRI. Methods: Patients with breast cancer who visited the National Cyclotron and PET Centre, Chulabhorn Hospital, in Bangkok, Thailand, between July 1, 2022, and February 28, 2023, for LVEF assessment were included in this prospective study. All patients underwent PET/CT using 3 different reconstruction techniques: dual-gated with electrocardiography and respiratory gating, dual-gated with artificial intelligence-assisted list-mode respiratory-compensated PET/CT (dual-gated list-mode PET/CT), and single-gated (electrocardiography-gated) PET/CT. Additionally, single-gated PET/MRI and cardiac MRI were performed to collect data on end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), and LVEF. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in LVEF measurements between any modality. Dual-gated PET/CT showed the lowest average percentage difference when compared with cardiac MRI (6.45%). Differences in EDV and ESV were not statistically significant among the PET-based methods but were significant between the cardiac MRI and all PET-based methods, with consistent percentage differences ranging from -37.64% to -39.38% for EDV and -43.68% to -45.32% for ESV. Intraclass correlation coefficients showed moderate to good reliability, and Pearson correlation coefficients indicated good to strong correlations between cardiac MRI and PET/MRI and among PET-based methods. Conclusion: PET-based methods produced comparable LVEF measurements to those obtained by cardiac MRI. The use of PET-based methods to evaluate LVEF may offer advantages in terms of convenience and accessibility in this population.

18F-FDG双门PET/CT、单门PET/MRI和心脏MRI左心室射血分数的比较
左室射血分数(Left ventricular ejection fraction, LVEF)是评价心功能的重要参数,其测量可以指导乳腺癌化疗患者的治疗决策。我们使用门控pet方法获得LVEF测量值,以确定它们是否产生与心脏MRI获得的结果相当的结果。方法:于2022年7月1日至2023年2月28日期间到泰国曼谷朱拉蓬医院国家回旋加速器和PET中心进行LVEF评估的乳腺癌患者纳入本前瞻性研究。所有患者使用3种不同的重建技术进行PET/CT检查:双门控心电图和呼吸门控,双门控人工智能辅助列表模式呼吸补偿PET/CT(双门控列表模式PET/CT)和单门控(心电图门控)PET/CT。此外,通过单门PET/MRI和心脏MRI收集舒张末期容积(EDV)、收缩末期容积(ESV)和LVEF的数据。结果:两种治疗方式间LVEF测量无统计学差异。与心脏MRI相比,双门PET/CT的平均百分比差异最小(6.45%)。EDV和ESV在基于pet的方法中差异无统计学意义,但心脏MRI与所有基于pet的方法之间差异显著,EDV的百分比差异为-37.64%至-39.38%,ESV的百分比差异为-43.68%至-45.32%。类内相关系数显示中等至良好的可靠性,Pearson相关系数显示心脏MRI与PET/MRI以及基于PET的方法之间具有良好至强的相关性。结论:基于pet的方法产生的LVEF测量值与心脏MRI获得的结果相当。使用基于pet的方法来评估LVEF在这一人群中的便利性和可及性方面可能具有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of nuclear medicine technology
Journal of nuclear medicine technology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
15.40%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书