Radiomics on 177Lu-DOTATATE Posttreatment Scans: Feasibility, Preprocessing Optimization, and Planar-SPECT Comparison.

IF 1.5 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Flavio Montanini, Alessio Imperiale, Alice Monaci, Samuele Valente, Vittorio Briganti, Elisabetta M Abenavoli, Matilde Nerattini, Miriam Pepponi, Gabriele Simontacchi, Lorenzo Livi, Daniele Lavacchi, Lorenzo Antonuzzo, Gayane Aghakhanyan, Giuseppe Boni, Duccio Volterrani, Valentina Berti
{"title":"Radiomics on <sup>177</sup>Lu-DOTATATE Posttreatment Scans: Feasibility, Preprocessing Optimization, and Planar-SPECT Comparison.","authors":"Flavio Montanini, Alessio Imperiale, Alice Monaci, Samuele Valente, Vittorio Briganti, Elisabetta M Abenavoli, Matilde Nerattini, Miriam Pepponi, Gabriele Simontacchi, Lorenzo Livi, Daniele Lavacchi, Lorenzo Antonuzzo, Gayane Aghakhanyan, Giuseppe Boni, Duccio Volterrani, Valentina Berti","doi":"10.2967/jnmt.126.272060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><sup>177</sup>Lu-DOTATATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an established therapeutic option for patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Although radiomics has been increasingly applied in NET research, it was developed almost exclusively using <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTATOC PET imaging, whereas PRRT-related scintigraphic acquisitions remain largely unexplored. This study evaluates the feasibility of extracting hepatic radiomic features from posttreatment whole-body planar scintigraphic (WBS) and tomographic (SPECT) scans, enabling the optimization of preprocessing strategies and a direct comparison of radiomic profiles between imaging modalities. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a retrospective analysis of data for 49 patients with well-differentiated, progressive metastatic gastroenteropancreatic NETs from 2 centers. All patients underwent posttreatment imaging within 2 d after each <sup>177</sup>Lu-DOTATATE PRRT cycle, for a total of 183 WBS and 108 SPECT scans. Preprocessing operations included image-intensity normalization, dividing each image by the mean counts of a region of interest positioned on the spleen (S-norm) and the third lumbar vertebra (V-norm). Radiomic features were extracted with no spatial resampling, using 64-bin discretization and relative intensity rescaling. <b>Results:</b> Texture extraction was successfully performed on all planar and SPECT images from both centers. Correlations between intensity-based features measured using S-norm and V-norm images showed weak yet statistically significant <i>r</i> values. Conversely, there was a robust correlation between histogram-based and second-order features measured on S-norm and V-norm images, reflected in high <i>r</i> values. V-norm intensity-based features exhibited significantly higher values and lower SDs when compared with S-norm intensity-based variables. When comparing WBS and SPECT scans, a strong correlation was observed between intensity-based variables, whereas histogram-based and second-order features showed no significant correlation. <b>Conclusion:</b> Radiomic analysis on <sup>177</sup>Lu-DOTATATE posttreatment scans was feasible, with proportional scaling to third-lumbar-vertebra activity resulting in the most effective intensity normalization approach, given the decreased variability compared with scaling to spleen activity. Correlations between features assessed using the 2 different scaling methods were weak for intensity-based features and strong for histogram-based and second-order features. Except for intensity-based features, radiomic features derived from WBS images were not comparable with those obtained from SPECT scans.</p>","PeriodicalId":16548,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nuclear medicine technology","volume":" ","pages":"289-296"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nuclear medicine technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.126.272060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

177Lu-DOTATATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an established therapeutic option for patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Although radiomics has been increasingly applied in NET research, it was developed almost exclusively using 68Ga-DOTATOC PET imaging, whereas PRRT-related scintigraphic acquisitions remain largely unexplored. This study evaluates the feasibility of extracting hepatic radiomic features from posttreatment whole-body planar scintigraphic (WBS) and tomographic (SPECT) scans, enabling the optimization of preprocessing strategies and a direct comparison of radiomic profiles between imaging modalities. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of data for 49 patients with well-differentiated, progressive metastatic gastroenteropancreatic NETs from 2 centers. All patients underwent posttreatment imaging within 2 d after each 177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT cycle, for a total of 183 WBS and 108 SPECT scans. Preprocessing operations included image-intensity normalization, dividing each image by the mean counts of a region of interest positioned on the spleen (S-norm) and the third lumbar vertebra (V-norm). Radiomic features were extracted with no spatial resampling, using 64-bin discretization and relative intensity rescaling. Results: Texture extraction was successfully performed on all planar and SPECT images from both centers. Correlations between intensity-based features measured using S-norm and V-norm images showed weak yet statistically significant r values. Conversely, there was a robust correlation between histogram-based and second-order features measured on S-norm and V-norm images, reflected in high r values. V-norm intensity-based features exhibited significantly higher values and lower SDs when compared with S-norm intensity-based variables. When comparing WBS and SPECT scans, a strong correlation was observed between intensity-based variables, whereas histogram-based and second-order features showed no significant correlation. Conclusion: Radiomic analysis on 177Lu-DOTATATE posttreatment scans was feasible, with proportional scaling to third-lumbar-vertebra activity resulting in the most effective intensity normalization approach, given the decreased variability compared with scaling to spleen activity. Correlations between features assessed using the 2 different scaling methods were weak for intensity-based features and strong for histogram-based and second-order features. Except for intensity-based features, radiomic features derived from WBS images were not comparable with those obtained from SPECT scans.

177Lu-DOTATATE后处理扫描的放射组学:可行性,预处理优化和平面spect比较。
177Lu-DOTATATE肽受体放射性核素治疗(PRRT)是神经内分泌肿瘤(NETs)患者的一种既定治疗选择。尽管放射组学在网络研究中的应用越来越多,但它几乎完全是使用68Ga-DOTATOC PET成像开发的,而与prrt相关的科学图像采集在很大程度上仍未被探索。本研究评估了从治疗后的全身平面扫描(WBS)和断层扫描(SPECT)中提取肝脏放射学特征的可行性,从而优化预处理策略并直接比较成像方式之间的放射学特征。方法:我们对来自2个中心的49例分化良好的进展性转移性胃肠胰腺NETs患者的数据进行了回顾性分析。所有患者在每个177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT周期后2天内进行治疗后成像,共183次WBS扫描和108次SPECT扫描。预处理操作包括图像强度归一化,将每张图像除以位于脾脏(s -范数)和第三腰椎(v -范数)上感兴趣区域的平均计数。采用64 bin离散化和相对强度重尺度,在不进行空间重采样的情况下提取放射性特征。结果:对两个中心的平面和SPECT图像均进行了纹理提取。使用s -范数和v -范数图像测量的基于强度的特征之间的相关性显示微弱但具有统计学意义的r值。相反,在s范数和v范数图像上测量的基于直方图的特征和二阶特征之间存在强大的相关性,反映在高r值上。与基于s -范数强度的变量相比,基于v -范数强度的特征值显著高于s -范数强度的特征值,SDs显著低于s -范数强度的特征值。当比较WBS和SPECT扫描时,基于强度的变量之间存在很强的相关性,而基于直方图的和二阶特征之间没有显著的相关性。结论:177Lu-DOTATATE治疗后扫描的放射组学分析是可行的,与第三腰椎活动成比例缩放导致最有效的强度归一化方法,考虑到与脾脏活动的缩放相比变异性降低。使用两种不同的缩放方法评估的特征之间的相关性对于基于强度的特征来说是弱的,而对于基于直方图和二阶特征来说是强的。除了基于强度的特征外,来自WBS图像的放射学特征与来自SPECT扫描的放射学特征没有可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of nuclear medicine technology
Journal of nuclear medicine technology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
15.40%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书