Coach perceptions of "playing-up" in youth football.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Journal of Sports Sciences Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-18 DOI:10.1080/02640414.2026.2645490
Adam L Kelly, Achuthan Shanmugaratnam, Liam Davies, Matthew Reeves, Matthew Andrew, James H Dugdale, Alexander B T McAuley
{"title":"Coach perceptions of \"playing-up\" in youth football.","authors":"Adam L Kelly, Achuthan Shanmugaratnam, Liam Davies, Matthew Reeves, Matthew Andrew, James H Dugdale, Alexander B T McAuley","doi":"10.1080/02640414.2026.2645490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Football coaches are often searching for the most appropriate development environment to help every player to achieve their potential. When youth football players show advanced competencies within their own age group (i.e. U9, U10, U11, etc.), they may be permitted to compete in a chronologically older age group - commonly referred to as 'playing-up'. Despite this approach being regularly used in practice, coach perceptions of playing-up are yet to be empirically evaluated. Therefore, this study used semi-structured interviews with ten academy football coaches from the United Kingdom to examine their perceptions of playing-up on player development. Following thematic analysis, results showed three higher-order themes comprising nine lower-order themes: (a) strengthening communication approaches (i.e. refine terminology used, emphasise communication between coaches and players, and educate key stakeholders), (b) considering support from social agents (i.e. include parents in the process, involve coaches and multidisciplinary staff in decision-making, and promote supportive peer environments), and (c) facilitating individual player development (i.e. challenge technical and tactical skills, reflect on psychosocial impact, and consider physical competencies). These findings highlight how coaches perceive playing-up as a useful holistic player development tool, which could be enhanced through effective key stakeholder communication and support.</p>","PeriodicalId":17066,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"2466-2481"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2026.2645490","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Football coaches are often searching for the most appropriate development environment to help every player to achieve their potential. When youth football players show advanced competencies within their own age group (i.e. U9, U10, U11, etc.), they may be permitted to compete in a chronologically older age group - commonly referred to as 'playing-up'. Despite this approach being regularly used in practice, coach perceptions of playing-up are yet to be empirically evaluated. Therefore, this study used semi-structured interviews with ten academy football coaches from the United Kingdom to examine their perceptions of playing-up on player development. Following thematic analysis, results showed three higher-order themes comprising nine lower-order themes: (a) strengthening communication approaches (i.e. refine terminology used, emphasise communication between coaches and players, and educate key stakeholders), (b) considering support from social agents (i.e. include parents in the process, involve coaches and multidisciplinary staff in decision-making, and promote supportive peer environments), and (c) facilitating individual player development (i.e. challenge technical and tactical skills, reflect on psychosocial impact, and consider physical competencies). These findings highlight how coaches perceive playing-up as a useful holistic player development tool, which could be enhanced through effective key stakeholder communication and support.

教练对青少年足球“玩起来”的看法。
足球教练经常寻找最合适的发展环境来帮助每个球员实现他们的潜力。当青少年足球运动员在他们自己的年龄组(即U9, U10, U11等)中表现出先进的能力时,他们可能被允许参加按时间顺序排列的较大年龄组的比赛-通常被称为“比赛”。尽管这种方法在实践中经常使用,但教练对上场的看法尚未得到实证评估。因此,本研究对来自英国的10名足球教练进行了半结构化访谈,以考察他们对球员发展的看法。在主题分析之后,结果显示三个高阶主题由九个低阶主题组成:(a)加强沟通方法(即改进使用的术语,强调教练和球员之间的沟通,并教育关键利益相关者),(b)考虑来自社会代理人的支持(即让父母参与过程,让教练和多学科工作人员参与决策,并促进支持性同伴环境),以及(c)促进球员个人发展(即挑战技术和战术技能,反思心理社会影响,再考虑一下身体能力)。这些发现强调了教练如何将比赛视为一种有用的整体球员发展工具,可以通过有效的关键利益相关者沟通和支持来增强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Sports Sciences
Journal of Sports Sciences 社会科学-运动科学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.90%
发文量
147
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sports Sciences has an international reputation for publishing articles of a high standard and is both Medline and Clarivate Analytics-listed. It publishes research on various aspects of the sports and exercise sciences, including anatomy, biochemistry, biomechanics, performance analysis, physiology, psychology, sports medicine and health, as well as coaching and talent identification, kinanthropometry and other interdisciplinary perspectives. The emphasis of the Journal is on the human sciences, broadly defined and applied to sport and exercise. Besides experimental work in human responses to exercise, the subjects covered will include human responses to technologies such as the design of sports equipment and playing facilities, research in training, selection, performance prediction or modification, and stress reduction or manifestation. Manuscripts considered for publication include those dealing with original investigations of exercise, validation of technological innovations in sport or comprehensive reviews of topics relevant to the scientific study of sport.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书