Feelings in the Lift: Comparing Perceptual Responses to Cluster and Traditional Resistance Training Protocols.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Bianca de Souza Soares, Josef Mohammad, Carlos Eduardo Cantelmo, Maria Clara Gomes Alves, Bruna Cristina de Oliveira Barros, Gustavo Vieira de Oliveira
{"title":"Feelings in the Lift: Comparing Perceptual Responses to Cluster and Traditional Resistance Training Protocols.","authors":"Bianca de Souza Soares, Josef Mohammad, Carlos Eduardo Cantelmo, Maria Clara Gomes Alves, Bruna Cristina de Oliveira Barros, Gustavo Vieira de Oliveira","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>de Souza Soares, B, Mohammad, J, Cantelmo, CE, Gomes Alves, MC, de Oliveira Barros, BC, and Vieira de Oliveira, G. Feelings in the lift: Comparing perceptual responses to cluster and traditional resistance training protocols. J Strength Cond Res 40(5): e437-e444, 2026-This study compared the acute effects of traditional vs. cluster resistance training (RT) protocols on affective valence, arousal, enjoyment, and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) in resistance-trained young adults. Sixteen subjects completed 2 lower-limb RT sessions in a randomized crossover design: 1 with a traditional configuration and another with cluster sets. Affective valence declined during and after the traditional session ( p < 0.05), but remained stable across time in the cluster session, with a significant protocol × time interaction ( p < 0.001). Perceived activation increased in both conditions ( p < 0.001) but was significantly higher after the traditional protocol ( p = 0.04; d = 0.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.12-1.21]). Enjoyment was significantly greater ( p < 0.01; d = 0.7, 95% CI [-1.31 to -0.18]), and RPE significantly lower ( p < 0.001; d = 1.2, 95% CI [0.52-1.82]) following the cluster session. Rating of perceived exertion negatively correlated with enjoyment ( r = -0.54, p = 0.03) and affective valence ( r = -0.54, p = 0.032) in the traditional condition. These results suggest that RT set configuration acutely modulates psychoaffective outcomes. Cluster RT elicits more favorable affective and perceptual responses, which may enhance exercise enjoyment and support long-term adherence.</p>","PeriodicalId":17129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","volume":" ","pages":"e437-e444"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000005360","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: de Souza Soares, B, Mohammad, J, Cantelmo, CE, Gomes Alves, MC, de Oliveira Barros, BC, and Vieira de Oliveira, G. Feelings in the lift: Comparing perceptual responses to cluster and traditional resistance training protocols. J Strength Cond Res 40(5): e437-e444, 2026-This study compared the acute effects of traditional vs. cluster resistance training (RT) protocols on affective valence, arousal, enjoyment, and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) in resistance-trained young adults. Sixteen subjects completed 2 lower-limb RT sessions in a randomized crossover design: 1 with a traditional configuration and another with cluster sets. Affective valence declined during and after the traditional session ( p < 0.05), but remained stable across time in the cluster session, with a significant protocol × time interaction ( p < 0.001). Perceived activation increased in both conditions ( p < 0.001) but was significantly higher after the traditional protocol ( p = 0.04; d = 0.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.12-1.21]). Enjoyment was significantly greater ( p < 0.01; d = 0.7, 95% CI [-1.31 to -0.18]), and RPE significantly lower ( p < 0.001; d = 1.2, 95% CI [0.52-1.82]) following the cluster session. Rating of perceived exertion negatively correlated with enjoyment ( r = -0.54, p = 0.03) and affective valence ( r = -0.54, p = 0.032) in the traditional condition. These results suggest that RT set configuration acutely modulates psychoaffective outcomes. Cluster RT elicits more favorable affective and perceptual responses, which may enhance exercise enjoyment and support long-term adherence.

在升降机的感觉:比较知觉反应对集群和传统的阻力训练协议。
摘要:de Souza Soares, B, Mohammad, J, Cantelmo, CE, Gomes Alves, MC, de Oliveira Barros, BC和Vieira de Oliveira, G.举重中的感觉:对集群和传统阻力训练方案的感知反应的比较。本研究比较了传统抗阻训练与集群式抗阻训练(RT)方案在抗阻训练青年的情感效价、觉醒、享受和感知运动等级(RPE)方面的急性效应。在随机交叉设计中,16名受试者完成了2次下肢RT治疗:1次采用传统配置,另1次采用聚类集。情感效价在传统会话期间和之后下降(p < 0.05),但在集群会话中保持稳定,具有显著的协议与时间交互作用(p < 0.001)。感知激活在两种情况下都有所增加(p < 0.001),但在传统方案后明显更高(p = 0.04; d = 0.7, 95%可信区间(CI)[0.12-1.21])。在群集会话后,享受显著增加(p < 0.01; d = 0.7, 95% CI [-1.31 ~ -0.18]), RPE显著降低(p < 0.001; d = 1.2, 95% CI[0.52 ~ 1.82])。在传统条件下,感觉努力程度评分与享受程度(r = -0.54, p = 0.03)和情感效价(r = -0.54, p = 0.032)呈负相关。这些结果表明,RT集配置急性调节心理情感结果。集群式RT可以引起更有利的情感和知觉反应,这可能会增强运动的乐趣并支持长期坚持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
9.40%
发文量
384
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The editorial mission of The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (JSCR) is to advance the knowledge about strength and conditioning through research. A unique aspect of this journal is that it includes recommendations for the practical use of research findings. While the journal name identifies strength and conditioning as separate entities, strength is considered a part of conditioning. This journal wishes to promote the publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts which add to our understanding of conditioning and sport through applied exercise science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书