Risks and complications within wax removal - Results of a survey and AI-based literature research.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Laryngo-rhino-otologie Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-17 DOI:10.1055/a-2811-3985
Jan Löhler, Tim Mathes, Stefan Dazert, Thomas Zahnert, Thomas Deitmer, Timo Stöver, Orlando Guntinas-Lichius
{"title":"Risks and complications within wax removal - Results of a survey and AI-based literature research.","authors":"Jan Löhler, Tim Mathes, Stefan Dazert, Thomas Zahnert, Thomas Deitmer, Timo Stöver, Orlando Guntinas-Lichius","doi":"10.1055/a-2811-3985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Germany, removing earwax is done in out-clinic ENT-patients daily and is associated with risks and complications. These should be identified using a systematic review. In comparison, an online-survey under out-clinic ENT surgeons should describe their everyday practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search using PICO-questions in MedLine was analyzed following the PRISMA schema, supported by AI technologies. In addition, an online-survey under out-clinic ENT-surgeons about cleaning the external ear channel has been done.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Finally, 13 studies of originally 1521 could be included. All conceivable complications occurred, most frequently injuries, inflammations, hearing loss, dizziness, and balance disorders, more rarely caused by ENT-physicians than by other persons. These results were supported by the results of the survey. Totally, two months were needed for searching and reporting.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using AI could accelerate the procedure of a systematic review significantly. Cleaning the External auditory canal more intensively than as part of everyday body care is impossible without any additional tools. Any other method has its risks and complication rate. In general, these could be differentiated and treated by ENT-physicians only, as demonstrated both by the literature and the results of the online survey.</p>","PeriodicalId":17965,"journal":{"name":"Laryngo-rhino-otologie","volume":" ","pages":"427-438"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngo-rhino-otologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2811-3985","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In Germany, removing earwax is done in out-clinic ENT-patients daily and is associated with risks and complications. These should be identified using a systematic review. In comparison, an online-survey under out-clinic ENT surgeons should describe their everyday practice.

Methods: A systematic search using PICO-questions in MedLine was analyzed following the PRISMA schema, supported by AI technologies. In addition, an online-survey under out-clinic ENT-surgeons about cleaning the external ear channel has been done.

Results: Finally, 13 studies of originally 1521 could be included. All conceivable complications occurred, most frequently injuries, inflammations, hearing loss, dizziness, and balance disorders, more rarely caused by ENT-physicians than by other persons. These results were supported by the results of the survey. Totally, two months were needed for searching and reporting.

Conclusion: Using AI could accelerate the procedure of a systematic review significantly. Cleaning the External auditory canal more intensively than as part of everyday body care is impossible without any additional tools. Any other method has its risks and complication rate. In general, these could be differentiated and treated by ENT-physicians only, as demonstrated both by the literature and the results of the online survey.

除蜡的风险和并发症——一项调查结果和基于人工智能的文献研究。
在德国,门诊部患者每天都要清除耳垢,这与风险和并发症有关。这些问题应该通过系统评价来确定。相比之下,门诊耳鼻喉外科医生的在线调查应该描述他们的日常实践。采用人工智能技术支持的PRISMA模式,对MedLine中使用PICO-questions进行系统搜索进行分析。此外,门诊门诊科医生对外耳通道清洁进行了在线调查。最后,可以纳入13项最初1521项的研究。所有可能的并发症都发生了,最常见的是损伤、炎症、听力损失、头晕和平衡障碍,由耳鼻喉科医生引起的情况比其他人更少。这些结果得到了调查结果的支持。搜索和报告总共需要两个月的时间。使用人工智能可以大大加快系统审查的过程。如果没有任何额外的工具,比日常身体护理的一部分更密集地清洁外耳道是不可能的。任何其他方法都有其风险和并发症发生率。一般来说,这些只能由耳鼻喉科医生区分和治疗,正如文献和在线调查结果所证明的那样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Laryngo-rhino-otologie
Laryngo-rhino-otologie 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
30.00%
发文量
1399
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Die Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie ist die deutschsprachige Fachzeitschrift für Ärzte in Klinik und Praxis mit Fokus auf die Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie. Die Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie bringt die Themen, die Sie wirklich interessieren und in der täglichen Arbeit unterstützen: Kurze, leicht lesbare Beiträge, interessante Rubriken und Originalarbeiten mit Relevanz für Ihre Arbeit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书