Tissue Eosinophil Count as a Novel Immune-Endotypic Prognostic Biomarker for Long-Term Outcomes of Posterior Nasal Neurectomy in Refractory Allergic Rhinitis.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 ALLERGY
Dan Su, Yonghong Ning, Song Zhang, Shun Wang, Yu Kong
{"title":"Tissue Eosinophil Count as a Novel Immune-Endotypic Prognostic Biomarker for Long-Term Outcomes of Posterior Nasal Neurectomy in Refractory Allergic Rhinitis.","authors":"Dan Su, Yonghong Ning, Song Zhang, Shun Wang, Yu Kong","doi":"10.1159/000551497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Refractory allergic rhinitis (RAR) encompasses distinct immune-inflammatory endotypes, notably neurogenic and eosinophilic phenotypes, which may differentially respond to surgical intervention such as posterior nasal neurectomy (PNN). Identifying prognostic biomarkers to guide patient selection remains an unmet clinical need.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, 92 patients with moderate-to-severe RAR undergoing endoscopic PNN were stratified by 1-year outcome (effective: ≥50% improvement in Total Nasal Symptom Score [TNSS]). Preoperative serum levels of neuropeptides (substance P, SP; vasoactive intestinal peptide) were measured. Postoperative histopathological tissue eosinophil (TEos) counts (cells/HPF) from resected nasal mucosa were analyzed. Patients were categorized into low TEos (<10/HPF) and high TEos (≥10/HPF) groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall effective rate was 88.0%. The effective group exhibited significantly higher preoperative SP (56.4 ± 12.1 vs. 38.2 ± 9.5 pg/mL, p < 0.001) and lower TEos counts (6.5 ± 3.2 vs. 18.4 ± 6.7 cells/HPF, p < 0.001). Low TEos count strongly correlated with greater TNSS improvement (r = -0.62, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified high TEos as an independent risk factor for poor outcome (OR = 4.25, 95% CI: 1.56-11.58, p = 0.005). ROC analysis confirmed TEos as a robust prognostic predictor (AUC = 0.845, cutoff 11.5 cells/HPF).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High tissue eosinophilia defines an immune-endotypic subset of RAR with attenuated response to PNN, whereas a neurogenic-dominant profile (high SP, low TEos) predicts excellent surgical prognosis. TEos count serves as a clinically actionable histopathological prognostic biomarker, facilitating personalized surgical management through immune-endotype stratification.</p>","PeriodicalId":13652,"journal":{"name":"International Archives of Allergy and Immunology","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Archives of Allergy and Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000551497","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Refractory allergic rhinitis (RAR) encompasses distinct immune-inflammatory endotypes, notably neurogenic and eosinophilic phenotypes, which may differentially respond to surgical intervention such as posterior nasal neurectomy (PNN). Identifying prognostic biomarkers to guide patient selection remains an unmet clinical need.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 92 patients with moderate-to-severe RAR undergoing endoscopic PNN were stratified by 1-year outcome (effective: ≥50% improvement in Total Nasal Symptom Score [TNSS]). Preoperative serum levels of neuropeptides (substance P, SP; vasoactive intestinal peptide) were measured. Postoperative histopathological tissue eosinophil (TEos) counts (cells/HPF) from resected nasal mucosa were analyzed. Patients were categorized into low TEos (<10/HPF) and high TEos (≥10/HPF) groups.

Results: The overall effective rate was 88.0%. The effective group exhibited significantly higher preoperative SP (56.4 ± 12.1 vs. 38.2 ± 9.5 pg/mL, p < 0.001) and lower TEos counts (6.5 ± 3.2 vs. 18.4 ± 6.7 cells/HPF, p < 0.001). Low TEos count strongly correlated with greater TNSS improvement (r = -0.62, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified high TEos as an independent risk factor for poor outcome (OR = 4.25, 95% CI: 1.56-11.58, p = 0.005). ROC analysis confirmed TEos as a robust prognostic predictor (AUC = 0.845, cutoff 11.5 cells/HPF).

Conclusion: High tissue eosinophilia defines an immune-endotypic subset of RAR with attenuated response to PNN, whereas a neurogenic-dominant profile (high SP, low TEos) predicts excellent surgical prognosis. TEos count serves as a clinically actionable histopathological prognostic biomarker, facilitating personalized surgical management through immune-endotype stratification.

组织嗜酸性粒细胞计数作为难治性变应性鼻炎后鼻神经切除术长期预后的一种新的免疫内型预后生物标志物。
难治性过敏性鼻炎(RAR)包括不同的免疫炎性内型,特别是神经源性和嗜酸性粒细胞表型,这可能对手术干预(如鼻后神经切除术(PNN))有不同的反应。确定预后生物标志物来指导患者选择仍然是一个未满足的临床需求。方法:在这项回顾性队列研究中,92例接受内镜下PNN治疗的中重度RAR患者按1年结局(有效:总鼻症状评分[TNSS]改善≥50%)进行分层。测定术前血清神经肽(P物质,SP;血管活性肠肽,VIP)水平。分析术后切除鼻黏膜组织病理组织嗜酸性粒细胞(TEos)计数(细胞/HPF)。结果:总有效率为88.0%。有效组的术前SP(56.4±12.1 vs. 38.2±9.5 pg/mL)明显高于对照组。结论:高组织嗜酸性定义了RAR的免疫内源性亚群,对PNN的反应减弱,而神经源性优势谱(高SP,低TEos)预示着良好的手术预后。TEos计数作为临床可操作的组织病理学预后生物标志物,通过免疫内窥镜分层促进个性化手术管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.60%
发文量
105
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: ''International Archives of Allergy and Immunology'' provides a forum for basic and clinical research in modern molecular and cellular allergology and immunology. Appearing monthly, the journal publishes original work in the fields of allergy, immunopathology, immunogenetics, immunopharmacology, immunoendocrinology, tumor immunology, mucosal immunity, transplantation and immunology of infectious and connective tissue diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书