Social learning and exploration-exploitation dilemma in decision-making.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Frontiers in Neural Circuits Pub Date : 2026-03-02 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fncir.2026.1781811
Gota Morishita, Shinsuke Suzuki
{"title":"Social learning and exploration-exploitation dilemma in decision-making.","authors":"Gota Morishita, Shinsuke Suzuki","doi":"10.3389/fncir.2026.1781811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This mini review examines the neurocomputational principles of social learning through the lens of the exploration-exploitation dilemma. While the neural mechanisms of learning from others-mediated by distinct signals in the ventromedial and lateral prefrontal cortices-are well established, less is known about how these mechanisms interact with the fundamental trade-off between gathering information (\"exploration\") and maximizing rewards (\"exploitation\"). We discuss how social environments shape this trade-off, leading to strategic behaviors such as informational free-riding or conformity. A central focus of this review is the issue of source selection: how agents decide whom to observe. We present recent evidence suggesting that, contrary to the predictions of optimal information-seeking theories, humans often exhibit a \"reliability-seeking\" bias, preferring to learn from consistent, exploitation-oriented partners rather than highly exploratory ones. We conclude by discussing the limitations of current paradigms, specifically the inherent confounding of social cues such as competence and predictability, and outline a computational framework for isolating the specific drivers of adaptive social decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":12498,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Neural Circuits","volume":"20 ","pages":"1781811"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12989571/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Neural Circuits","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fncir.2026.1781811","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This mini review examines the neurocomputational principles of social learning through the lens of the exploration-exploitation dilemma. While the neural mechanisms of learning from others-mediated by distinct signals in the ventromedial and lateral prefrontal cortices-are well established, less is known about how these mechanisms interact with the fundamental trade-off between gathering information ("exploration") and maximizing rewards ("exploitation"). We discuss how social environments shape this trade-off, leading to strategic behaviors such as informational free-riding or conformity. A central focus of this review is the issue of source selection: how agents decide whom to observe. We present recent evidence suggesting that, contrary to the predictions of optimal information-seeking theories, humans often exhibit a "reliability-seeking" bias, preferring to learn from consistent, exploitation-oriented partners rather than highly exploratory ones. We conclude by discussing the limitations of current paradigms, specifically the inherent confounding of social cues such as competence and predictability, and outline a computational framework for isolating the specific drivers of adaptive social decision-making.

社会学习与决策中的探索-开发困境。
这篇迷你综述通过探索-利用困境的视角审视了社会学习的神经计算原理。虽然学习他人的神经机制——由腹内侧和外侧前额叶皮层的不同信号介导——已经很好地建立起来,但对于这些机制如何与收集信息(“探索”)和最大化回报(“利用”)之间的基本权衡相互作用,我们知之甚少。我们讨论了社会环境如何塑造这种权衡,导致诸如信息搭便车或从众等战略行为。本综述的中心焦点是来源选择问题:代理人如何决定观察谁。我们提出的最新证据表明,与最优信息寻求理论的预测相反,人类经常表现出“寻求可靠性”的偏见,更喜欢从始终如一的、以利用为导向的伙伴那里学习,而不是从高度探索的伙伴那里学习。最后,我们讨论了当前范式的局限性,特别是能力和可预测性等社会线索的固有混淆,并概述了一个用于分离适应性社会决策特定驱动因素的计算框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
135
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Neural Circuits publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research on the emergent properties of neural circuits - the elementary modules of the brain. Specialty Chief Editors Takao K. Hensch and Edward Ruthazer at Harvard University and McGill University respectively, are supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics and the public worldwide. Frontiers in Neural Circuits launched in 2011 with great success and remains a "central watering hole" for research in neural circuits, serving the community worldwide to share data, ideas and inspiration. Articles revealing the anatomy, physiology, development or function of any neural circuitry in any species (from sponges to humans) are welcome. Our common thread seeks the computational strategies used by different circuits to link their structure with function (perceptual, motor, or internal), the general rules by which they operate, and how their particular designs lead to the emergence of complex properties and behaviors. Submissions focused on synaptic, cellular and connectivity principles in neural microcircuits using multidisciplinary approaches, especially newer molecular, developmental and genetic tools, are encouraged. Studies with an evolutionary perspective to better understand how circuit design and capabilities evolved to produce progressively more complex properties and behaviors are especially welcome. The journal is further interested in research revealing how plasticity shapes the structural and functional architecture of neural circuits.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书