Functional recovery and rehabilitation efficiency after elective versus urgent trauma-related orthopedic surgery in older adults: a retrospective cohort study.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Eduard Zalyesov, Gaseb Awawde, Yehonatan Hershkovich, Merav Ben Natan, Sarit Nissan, Inna Shugaev
{"title":"Functional recovery and rehabilitation efficiency after elective versus urgent trauma-related orthopedic surgery in older adults: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Eduard Zalyesov, Gaseb Awawde, Yehonatan Hershkovich, Merav Ben Natan, Sarit Nissan, Inna Shugaev","doi":"10.1097/MRR.0000000000000698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This retrospective cohort study compared functional recovery and rehabilitation efficiency among older adults undergoing inpatient geriatric-orthopedic rehabilitation following elective versus urgent trauma-related orthopedic surgery and examined independent predictors of total Functional Independence Measure (FIM) gain. The sample included 563 adults aged greater than or equal to 65 years (elective surgery, n  = 219; urgent surgery, n  = 344) admitted to a government-funded geriatric rehabilitation hospital, all of whom received standardized multidisciplinary rehabilitation. Functional status was assessed at admission and discharge using the FIM. Outcomes included total FIM gain, motor FIM gain, cognitive FIM gain, and rehabilitation efficiency (functional gain per day). Multivariable regression models adjusted for age, sex, comorbidity burden, admission FIM, and length of stay. Patients in the group were older and had significantly lower admission FIM scores ( P  < 0.001). Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in total, motor, and cognitive FIM scores during rehabilitation ( P  < 0.001). Although discharge FIM scores remained lower among urgent-surgery patients, total FIM gain did not differ between groups. Motor rehabilitation efficiency was higher in the elective-surgery group (0.83 versus 0.70 points/day; P  = 0.025), and admission FIM emerged as the strongest independent predictor of total FIM gain. These findings suggest that older adults may achieve meaningful functional recovery during inpatient orthopedic rehabilitation regardless of surgical pathway and support consideration of equitable access to intensive post-acute rehabilitation services.</p>","PeriodicalId":14301,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Rehabilitation Research","volume":" ","pages":"122-128"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Rehabilitation Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000698","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This retrospective cohort study compared functional recovery and rehabilitation efficiency among older adults undergoing inpatient geriatric-orthopedic rehabilitation following elective versus urgent trauma-related orthopedic surgery and examined independent predictors of total Functional Independence Measure (FIM) gain. The sample included 563 adults aged greater than or equal to 65 years (elective surgery, n  = 219; urgent surgery, n  = 344) admitted to a government-funded geriatric rehabilitation hospital, all of whom received standardized multidisciplinary rehabilitation. Functional status was assessed at admission and discharge using the FIM. Outcomes included total FIM gain, motor FIM gain, cognitive FIM gain, and rehabilitation efficiency (functional gain per day). Multivariable regression models adjusted for age, sex, comorbidity burden, admission FIM, and length of stay. Patients in the group were older and had significantly lower admission FIM scores ( P  < 0.001). Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in total, motor, and cognitive FIM scores during rehabilitation ( P  < 0.001). Although discharge FIM scores remained lower among urgent-surgery patients, total FIM gain did not differ between groups. Motor rehabilitation efficiency was higher in the elective-surgery group (0.83 versus 0.70 points/day; P  = 0.025), and admission FIM emerged as the strongest independent predictor of total FIM gain. These findings suggest that older adults may achieve meaningful functional recovery during inpatient orthopedic rehabilitation regardless of surgical pathway and support consideration of equitable access to intensive post-acute rehabilitation services.

老年人选择性与紧急创伤相关骨科手术后的功能恢复和康复效率:一项回顾性队列研究
这项回顾性队列研究比较了选择性和紧急创伤相关骨科手术后住院老年骨科康复的老年人的功能恢复和康复效率,并检查了功能独立测量(FIM)总增益的独立预测因子。样本包括563名年龄大于或等于65岁的成年人(选择性手术219例,紧急手术344例),均在政府资助的老年康复医院接受标准化的多学科康复治疗。在入院和出院时使用FIM评估功能状态。结果包括总FIM增益、运动FIM增益、认知FIM增益和康复效率(每天功能增益)。多变量回归模型调整了年龄、性别、合并症负担、入院FIM和住院时间。该组患者年龄较大,入院FIM评分明显低于对照组(P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Rehabilitation Research is a quarterly, peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary forum for the publication of research into functioning, disability and contextual factors experienced by persons of all ages in both developed and developing societies. The wealth of information offered makes the journal a valuable resource for researchers, practitioners, and administrators in such fields as rehabilitation medicine, outcome measurement nursing, social and vocational rehabilitation/case management, return to work, special education, social policy, social work and social welfare, sociology, psychology, psychiatry assistive technology and environmental factors/disability. Areas of interest include functioning and disablement throughout the life cycle; rehabilitation programmes for persons with physical, sensory, mental and developmental disabilities; measurement of functioning and disability; special education and vocational rehabilitation; equipment access and transportation; information technology; independent living; consumer, legal, economic and sociopolitical aspects of functioning, disability and contextual factors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书