Clopidogrel Versus Aspirin Monotherapy Beyond 1 Year After PCI: The Final 5-Year Results of the STOPDAPT-2 ACS and STOPDAPT-2 Total Cohort.

IF 7.2 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Hirotoshi Watanabe, Takeshi Morimoto, Masahiro Natsuaki, Ko Yamamoto, Yuki Obayashi, Ryusuke Nishikawa, Tomoya Kimura, Kazuaki Imada, Satoru Suwa, Tsuyoshi Isawa, Kenji Ando, Takanari Fujita, Kazushige Kadota, Hideo Tokuyama, Hiroki Sakamoto, Hiroshi Suzuki, Kohei Wakabayashi, Koh Ono, Fujio Hayashi, Kengo Tanabe, Masaharu Akao, Yuko Onishi, Ruka Yoshida, Takanori Kusuyama, Toshihiro Tamura, Yoshiro Onoue, Masahiro Yagi, Kazuaki Kaitani, Takeshi Kimura
{"title":"Clopidogrel Versus Aspirin Monotherapy Beyond 1 Year After PCI: The Final 5-Year Results of the STOPDAPT-2 ACS and STOPDAPT-2 Total Cohort.","authors":"Hirotoshi Watanabe, Takeshi Morimoto, Masahiro Natsuaki, Ko Yamamoto, Yuki Obayashi, Ryusuke Nishikawa, Tomoya Kimura, Kazuaki Imada, Satoru Suwa, Tsuyoshi Isawa, Kenji Ando, Takanari Fujita, Kazushige Kadota, Hideo Tokuyama, Hiroki Sakamoto, Hiroshi Suzuki, Kohei Wakabayashi, Koh Ono, Fujio Hayashi, Kengo Tanabe, Masaharu Akao, Yuko Onishi, Ruka Yoshida, Takanori Kusuyama, Toshihiro Tamura, Yoshiro Onoue, Masahiro Yagi, Kazuaki Kaitani, Takeshi Kimura","doi":"10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.125.016280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clopidogrel may have ischemic benefit over aspirin as long-term monotherapy in patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Both the STOPDAPT-2 (Short and Optimal Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy-2) and STOPDAPT-2 ACS (Short and Optimal Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy-2 Study for the Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome) were multicenter, open-label, adjudicator-blinded, randomized clinical trials in Japan, with the same protocol except that the STOPDAPT-2 ACS enrolled patients with acute coronary syndrome, exclusively. The patients after percutaneous coronary intervention with cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents were randomized into 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy followed by clopidogrel monotherapy (clopidogrel group) or 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy followed by aspirin monotherapy (aspirin group). Follow-up duration was 5 years. The clinical effect between clopidogrel and aspirin monotherapy was compared by the 1-year landmark analysis in the STOPDAPT-2 ACS and STOPDAPT-2 total cohort, a pooled cohort of the 2 trials. The primary end point was the composite of cardiovascular end point (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or definite stent thrombosis) and bleeding end point (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction major/minor). The major secondary end points were each of the cardiovascular composite end point and the bleeding end point.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2986 patients (clopidogrel group: 1492, aspirin group: 1494) in the 5-year analysis of the STOPDAPT-2 ACS, 2875 (96.3%) completed follow-up. By the 1-year landmark analysis, clopidogrel group was superior to aspirin group for both the primary end point (6.18% and 8.27%; hazard ratio, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.57-0.997]; <i>P</i>=0.048) and the major secondary cardiovascular end point (4.73% and 6.77%; hazard ratio, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.51-0.96]; <i>P</i>=0.03). In the STOPDAPT-2 total cohort, including 5991 patients, the superiority of clopidogrel over aspirin for the cardiovascular end point was highly significant (hazard ratio, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.60-0.91]; <i>P</i>=0.004), although the superiority on the primary end point was insignificant (hazard ratio, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.72-1.03]; <i>P</i>=0.11). There was no between-groups difference in the major secondary bleeding end point, both in the STOPDAPT-2 ACS and STOPDAPT-2 total cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clopidogrel monotherapy was superior to aspirin monotherapy for cardiovascular outcomes beyond 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention, without increased bleeding risk.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02619760 and NCT03462498.</p>","PeriodicalId":10330,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":" ","pages":"e016280"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.125.016280","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clopidogrel may have ischemic benefit over aspirin as long-term monotherapy in patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention.

Methods: Both the STOPDAPT-2 (Short and Optimal Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy-2) and STOPDAPT-2 ACS (Short and Optimal Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy-2 Study for the Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome) were multicenter, open-label, adjudicator-blinded, randomized clinical trials in Japan, with the same protocol except that the STOPDAPT-2 ACS enrolled patients with acute coronary syndrome, exclusively. The patients after percutaneous coronary intervention with cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents were randomized into 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy followed by clopidogrel monotherapy (clopidogrel group) or 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy followed by aspirin monotherapy (aspirin group). Follow-up duration was 5 years. The clinical effect between clopidogrel and aspirin monotherapy was compared by the 1-year landmark analysis in the STOPDAPT-2 ACS and STOPDAPT-2 total cohort, a pooled cohort of the 2 trials. The primary end point was the composite of cardiovascular end point (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or definite stent thrombosis) and bleeding end point (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction major/minor). The major secondary end points were each of the cardiovascular composite end point and the bleeding end point.

Results: Of 2986 patients (clopidogrel group: 1492, aspirin group: 1494) in the 5-year analysis of the STOPDAPT-2 ACS, 2875 (96.3%) completed follow-up. By the 1-year landmark analysis, clopidogrel group was superior to aspirin group for both the primary end point (6.18% and 8.27%; hazard ratio, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.57-0.997]; P=0.048) and the major secondary cardiovascular end point (4.73% and 6.77%; hazard ratio, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.51-0.96]; P=0.03). In the STOPDAPT-2 total cohort, including 5991 patients, the superiority of clopidogrel over aspirin for the cardiovascular end point was highly significant (hazard ratio, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.60-0.91]; P=0.004), although the superiority on the primary end point was insignificant (hazard ratio, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.72-1.03]; P=0.11). There was no between-groups difference in the major secondary bleeding end point, both in the STOPDAPT-2 ACS and STOPDAPT-2 total cohort.

Conclusions: Clopidogrel monotherapy was superior to aspirin monotherapy for cardiovascular outcomes beyond 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention, without increased bleeding risk.

Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02619760 and NCT03462498.

氯吡格雷与阿司匹林单药治疗PCI术后1年:STOPDAPT-2 ACS和STOPDAPT-2总队列的最终5年结果
背景:在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者中,氯吡格雷作为长期单药治疗可能比阿司匹林有缺血性益处。方法:STOPDAPT-2(短期和最佳持续时间双重抗血小板治疗-2)和STOPDAPT-2 ACS(短期和最佳持续时间双重抗血小板治疗-2研究急性冠状动脉综合征患者)是在日本进行的多中心、开放标签、评估者盲法、随机临床试验,除了STOPDAPT-2 ACS只招募急性冠状动脉综合征患者外,采用相同的方案。经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后采用钴铬依维莫司洗脱支架的患者随机分为1个月双抗血小板治疗合并氯吡格雷单药治疗(氯吡格雷组)或12个月双抗血小板治疗合并阿司匹林单药治疗(阿司匹林组)。随访时间为5年。通过STOPDAPT-2 ACS和STOPDAPT-2总队列(两项试验的合并队列)的1年里程碑分析,比较氯吡格雷和阿司匹林单药治疗的临床效果。主要终点是心血管终点(心血管死亡、心肌梗死、卒中或明确的支架血栓形成)和出血终点(严重/轻微心肌梗死溶栓)的复合终点。主要次要终点为心血管复合终点和出血终点。结果:2986例患者(氯吡格雷组1492例,阿司匹林组1494例)在STOPDAPT-2 ACS的5年分析中,2875例(96.3%)完成随访。通过1年里程碑分析,氯吡格雷组在主要终点(6.18%和8.27%,风险比为0.75 [95% CI, 0.57-0.997], P=0.048)和主要心血管次要终点(4.73%和6.77%,风险比为0.70 [95% CI, 0.51-0.96], P=0.03)均优于阿司匹林组。在包括5991例患者的stopdpt -2总队列中,氯吡格雷在心血管终点上优于阿司匹林的优势非常显著(风险比0.74 [95% CI, 0.60-0.91]; P=0.004),尽管在主要终点上的优势不显著(风险比0.86 [95% CI, 0.72-1.03]; P=0.11)。在STOPDAPT-2 ACS组和STOPDAPT-2总组中,两组间主要继发性出血终点均无差异。结论:在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后1年以上的心血管预后方面,氯吡格雷单药治疗优于阿司匹林单药治疗,且未增加出血风险。注册:网址:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov;唯一标识符:NCT02619760和NCT03462498。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
1.80%
发文量
221
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, an American Heart Association journal, focuses on interventional techniques pertaining to coronary artery disease, structural heart disease, and vascular disease, with priority placed on original research and on randomized trials and large registry studies. In addition, pharmacological, diagnostic, and pathophysiological aspects of interventional cardiology are given special attention in this online-only journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书