Comparative Evaluation of the Effects of Serum Separator Tubes and Transport Systems on Hormone and Tumor Marker Measurements.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Hyun-Woo Lee,Hyung-Doo Park
{"title":"Comparative Evaluation of the Effects of Serum Separator Tubes and Transport Systems on Hormone and Tumor Marker Measurements.","authors":"Hyun-Woo Lee,Hyung-Doo Park","doi":"10.3343/alm.2025.0409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\r\nControlling pre-analytical factors ensures the accuracy of hormone and tumor marker assays. We evaluated the combined effects of using different serum separator tubes (i.e., Ampulab [Soyagreentec]), Vacutainer [Becton Dickinson], and Vacuette [Greiner Bio-One]) and transport methods (i.e., the AirLab high-speed pneumatic tube system [PTS; PazKorea] and a conveyor system) on measurement results of 20 analytes.\r\n\r\nMethods\r\nBlood was collected from 57 volunteers and equally distributed into six tubes per participant to cover all possible tube type-transport system combinations. Twenty analytes were measured using Cobas e801 (Roche Diagnostics) and UniCel DXI 800 (Beckman Coulter) analyzers. For each analyte, the same analyzer was used across all samples. To evaluate hemolysis in PTS-transported samples, hemolytic index, AST, potassium, and lactate dehydrogenase levels were measured using Cobas c702 (Roche Diagnostics). Clinically significant or important differences were defined as average percentage biases exceeding European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine desirable and optimal bias criteria, respectively.\r\n\r\nResults\r\nEstradiol showed a clinically significant difference (-8.21%) in conveyor-transported Vacutainer versus Vacuette tubes and clinically important difference between Ampulab and other tubes as separator gel adsorption was different. Insulin exhibited a clinically important negative bias (-6.83%) in PTS-transported Vacuette tubes owing to insulin-degrading enzyme release from hemolyzed erythrocytes. No other analytes exhibited clinically significant or important differences. Vacuette tubes were the most susceptible to PTS-induced hemolysis, corresponding to the largest insulin bias.\r\n\r\nConclusions\r\nAmpulab tubes and the AirLab system performed comparably to their comparators, though caution is warranted for estradiol and insulin results.","PeriodicalId":8421,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Laboratory Medicine","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2025.0409","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Controlling pre-analytical factors ensures the accuracy of hormone and tumor marker assays. We evaluated the combined effects of using different serum separator tubes (i.e., Ampulab [Soyagreentec]), Vacutainer [Becton Dickinson], and Vacuette [Greiner Bio-One]) and transport methods (i.e., the AirLab high-speed pneumatic tube system [PTS; PazKorea] and a conveyor system) on measurement results of 20 analytes. Methods Blood was collected from 57 volunteers and equally distributed into six tubes per participant to cover all possible tube type-transport system combinations. Twenty analytes were measured using Cobas e801 (Roche Diagnostics) and UniCel DXI 800 (Beckman Coulter) analyzers. For each analyte, the same analyzer was used across all samples. To evaluate hemolysis in PTS-transported samples, hemolytic index, AST, potassium, and lactate dehydrogenase levels were measured using Cobas c702 (Roche Diagnostics). Clinically significant or important differences were defined as average percentage biases exceeding European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine desirable and optimal bias criteria, respectively. Results Estradiol showed a clinically significant difference (-8.21%) in conveyor-transported Vacutainer versus Vacuette tubes and clinically important difference between Ampulab and other tubes as separator gel adsorption was different. Insulin exhibited a clinically important negative bias (-6.83%) in PTS-transported Vacuette tubes owing to insulin-degrading enzyme release from hemolyzed erythrocytes. No other analytes exhibited clinically significant or important differences. Vacuette tubes were the most susceptible to PTS-induced hemolysis, corresponding to the largest insulin bias. Conclusions Ampulab tubes and the AirLab system performed comparably to their comparators, though caution is warranted for estradiol and insulin results.
血清分离管和运输系统对激素和肿瘤标志物测量影响的比较评价。
控制分析前因素可确保激素和肿瘤标志物测定的准确性。我们评估了使用不同血清分离管(即Ampulab [Soyagreentec])、Vacutainer [Becton Dickinson]和Vacuette [Greiner Bio-One])和运输方法(即AirLab高速气动管系统[PTS; PazKorea]和输送系统)对20种分析物测量结果的综合影响。方法收集57名志愿者的血液,平均分配到6个试管中,以涵盖所有可能的管道类型运输系统组合。使用Cobas e801(罗氏诊断)和UniCel DXI 800(贝克曼库尔特)分析仪测定20种分析物。对于每种分析物,在所有样品中使用相同的分析仪。为了评估pts运输样品的溶血情况,使用Cobas c702(罗氏诊断公司)测量溶血指数、AST、钾和乳酸脱氢酶水平。临床显著或重要差异被定义为平均偏差百分比分别超过欧洲临床化学和实验室医学联合会理想偏差标准和最佳偏差标准。结果stradiol在输送式Vacutainer与Vacuette tube中差异有统计学意义(-8.21%),而在Ampulab与其他管道中,由于分离凝胶吸附不同,差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。由于溶血红细胞释放胰岛素降解酶,胰岛素在pts运输的空泡管中表现出临床重要的负偏倚(-6.83%)。其他分析没有表现出临床显著或重要的差异。液泡管对pts诱导的溶血最敏感,对应于最大的胰岛素偏倚。结论sampulab管和AirLab系统的表现与其比较器相当,但对雌二醇和胰岛素的结果需要谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Laboratory Medicine
Annals of Laboratory Medicine MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
12.20%
发文量
100
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Laboratory Medicine is the official journal of Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine. The journal title has been recently changed from the Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine (ISSN, 1598-6535) from the January issue of 2012. The JCR 2017 Impact factor of Ann Lab Med was 1.916.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书